I used it before 2.1.1 when I was using 1.9 version of Digikam.
Now trying it with newer version it works well but instead of producing a panorama image with real shots it seems using thumbnails only. I say this 'cause the produced image is all black with in the center a small panorama assembled image from images I used. So all seems working just on thumbnails. Dimension of the new produced panorama is very small 200-300 kb starting with 2-3 images of 10+ Mb each. Have some of you just noticed this strange behaviour or may you suggest some digikam configuration in conflict with the use of Panorama stitching tool? I used both systems: either selecting images from inside Digikam album or launching Panorama from K-menu. I tried also using Hugin but without wizard it seems very difficult to go in touch with it. thank you in advance all the best Antonio -- -- Antonio Trincone http://publicationslist.org/antonio.trincone http://www.icb.cnr.it/antonio.trincone/ http://sites.google.com/site/phototrincone/ http://sites.google.com/site/cvtrincone/home http://imaginesvolantscriptamanent.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
2011/9/17 Antonio Trincone <[hidden email]>:
> I used it before 2.1.1 when I was using 1.9 version of Digikam. Impossible. Pano tool have just been release with 2.1.1. I suppose that you want mean ExpoBlending tool to generate pseudo HDR image. Right ? Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
No, simply I was not precise in my post. I had Panorama as external program when I had Digikam 1.9 (or 2.0 I can not go precise now) and I remember I used it choosing icon from Kmenu. I am not talking about Expoblending which I used just one time and I remember all worked well. By choosing Panorama icon it started the same wizard as the one now starts from the inside Digikam 2.1.1 or this is my comprehension. Sorry not to be well detailed.
ciao Antonio 2011/9/17 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> 2011/9/17 Antonio Trincone <[hidden email]>: -- -- Antonio Trincone http://publicationslist.org/antonio.trincone http://www.icb.cnr.it/antonio.trincone/ http://sites.google.com/site/phototrincone/ http://sites.google.com/site/cvtrincone/home http://imaginesvolantscriptamanent.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Antonio Trincone
Hi Antonio,
Did you get any error prior to the final make? What output did you check jpg, tiff, hdr? Rinus Op 17-09-11 15:39, Antonio Trincone schreef: I used it before 2.1.1 when I was using 1.9 version of Digikam. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Antonio Trincone
Hi Antonio,
2011/9/17 Antonio Trincone <[hidden email]>: > I used it before 2.1.1 when I was using 1.9 version of Digikam. > Now trying it with newer version it works well but instead of producing a > panorama image with real shots it seems using thumbnails only. I say this > 'cause the produced image is all black with in the center a small panorama > assembled image from images I used. So all seems working just on thumbnails. > Dimension of the new produced panorama is very small 200-300 kb starting > with 2-3 images of 10+ Mb each. If the image is mostly composed of black, the size will be most likely small if it is a jpeg. What is important is the size in term of pixels (what is the height and the width of the image in pixels). Note that a big black area does not mean necessarily that the thumbnails would have been used (which is would been strange). Anyway, I need more data about the panorama: - As Rinus wrote: what kind of output did you ask? jpeg? tiff? hdr? - What kind of photos were you trying to stitch? jpegs? raws? - What is you version of Hugin? and was it the same before (this is important)? Best Regards, -- Benjamin Girault. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
I made a few panoramas that went very well, but I have been able to
reproduce with pictures that ar in fact not related, and I got an error about make before the panorama was stiched. The result was very creative and amusing but was in size incorrect. Antonio, would it be possible to upload your photos somewhere to see if it happens here too. Rinus Op 17-09-11 20:13, Benjamin GIRAULT schreef: > Hi Antonio, > > 2011/9/17 Antonio Trincone<[hidden email]>: >> I used it before 2.1.1 when I was using 1.9 version of Digikam. >> Now trying it with newer version it works well but instead of producing a >> panorama image with real shots it seems using thumbnails only. I say this >> 'cause the produced image is all black with in the center a small panorama >> assembled image from images I used. So all seems working just on thumbnails. >> Dimension of the new produced panorama is very small 200-300 kb starting >> with 2-3 images of 10+ Mb each. > If the image is mostly composed of black, the size will be most likely > small if it is a jpeg. What is important is the size in term of pixels > (what is the height and the width of the image in pixels). > > Note that a big black area does not mean necessarily that the > thumbnails would have been used (which is would been strange). Anyway, > I need more data about the panorama: > > - As Rinus wrote: what kind of output did you ask? jpeg? tiff? hdr? > - What kind of photos were you trying to stitch? jpegs? raws? > - What is you version of Hugin? and was it the same before (this is important)? > > Best Regards, > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Rinus
No Rinus
I did'nt take errors, the process was smooth as usual. I check jpg output starting either with RAW files or png files. ciao ANtonio 2011/9/17 sleepless <[hidden email]>
-- -- Antonio Trincone http://publicationslist.org/antonio.trincone http://www.icb.cnr.it/antonio.trincone/ http://sites.google.com/site/phototrincone/ http://sites.google.com/site/cvtrincone/home http://imaginesvolantscriptamanent.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Benjamin Girault
Some of the answers are in the post for Rinus. Starting photos were normal slices of panorama without black areas, I understand your point. About Hugin versions the current one I have installed is 2011.0.0.0f9fdaf56720 as stated in the info window. Panorama stitching as launched from Kmenu brings these info:
Build date: Sep 14 2011 (target: Debian)
Version 2.1.1 thank you for interest Ciao Antonio
2011/9/17 Benjamin GIRAULT <[hidden email]> Hi Antonio, -- -- Antonio Trincone http://publicationslist.org/antonio.trincone http://www.icb.cnr.it/antonio.trincone/ http://sites.google.com/site/phototrincone/ http://sites.google.com/site/cvtrincone/home http://imaginesvolantscriptamanent.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Antonio Trincone
The cause will be hard to find. I can not reproduce using JPG and not with PEF. Could you try to convert yours to jpg and see if it still happens? And what was the original format of your RAW and PNG? Rinus Op 17-09-11 21:27, Antonio Trincone schreef: No Rinus _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Antonio Trincone
Op 17-09-11 21:35, Antonio Trincone schreef:
Some of the answers are in the post for Rinus. Starting photos were normal slices of panorama without black areas, I understand your point. About Hugin versions the current one I have installed is 2011.0.0.0f9fdaf56720 as stated in the info window. Panorama stitching as launched from Kmenu brings these info:it might be to big to be allowed, you can send it to me instead [hidden email]. I will put it on dropbox so BENJAMIN CAN INVESTIGATE. Thanks so far. Rinus
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Benjamin Girault
Please enclosed find the bad result as I said with "thumbnails mood".
Here you can see the good results https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/9ghOH14sAwDaEMi76YiekQ?full-exif=true Fortunately I can understand from this page that the Hugin version looks the same Hugin 2011.0.0.0f9fdaf56720 but the difference seems to be Digikam version (right one 2.1.0, wrong one 2.1.1 enclosed file). Hope this will clear the situation in your mind and will be helpful to you (and me). Obviously feel free to ask any other details you need to know. thanks Antonio 2011/9/17 Benjamin GIRAULT <[hidden email]> Hi Antonio, -- -- Antonio Trincone http://publicationslist.org/antonio.trincone http://www.icb.cnr.it/antonio.trincone/ http://sites.google.com/site/phototrincone/ http://sites.google.com/site/cvtrincone/home http://imaginesvolantscriptamanent.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users panorama1.jpg (293K) Download Attachment |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |