Hi,
I have had the need to review the variety of packages available to a professional photographer for RAW manipulation and JPG creation for submission to a professional image library. From the commercial side Lightbox and Photoshop rank high on the list. Well in fact they are considered to be the industry standard from the "other side". Aside from metadata coding being slightly different (everything was there but certain fields were called different things in each packages), I was able to do everything I could do and more (and I would say easier) on the open source alternatives. I am currently using digiKam + UFRaw with GIMP in certain situations. This combination gave me more functionality for what I needed than Photoshop + Lightbox. Unbelievable. I would like to congratulate the digiKam group on a sensational piece of software because although I use UFRaw and GIMP, I can do everything they do in digiKam. It is just I am familiar with these packages and find doing some tasks in them easier / familiar. -- Cheers Simon Simon Cropper - Open Content Creator Free and Open Source Software Workflow Guides ------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction http://www.fossworkflowguides.com GIS Packages http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/gis bash / Python http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/scripting _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Thanks Simon...
Gilles Caulier 2012/8/10 Simon Cropper <[hidden email]>: > Hi, > > I have had the need to review the variety of packages available to a > professional photographer for RAW manipulation and JPG creation for > submission to a professional image library. > > From the commercial side Lightbox and Photoshop rank high on the list. Well > in fact they are considered to be the industry standard from the "other > side". > > Aside from metadata coding being slightly different (everything was there > but certain fields were called different things in each packages), I was > able to do everything I could do and more (and I would say easier) on the > open source alternatives. > > I am currently using digiKam + UFRaw with GIMP in certain situations. This > combination gave me more functionality for what I needed than Photoshop + > Lightbox. Unbelievable. > > I would like to congratulate the digiKam group on a sensational piece of > software because although I use UFRaw and GIMP, I can do everything they do > in digiKam. It is just I am familiar with these packages and find doing some > tasks in them easier / familiar. > > -- > Cheers Simon > > Simon Cropper - Open Content Creator > > Free and Open Source Software Workflow Guides > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Introduction http://www.fossworkflowguides.com > GIS Packages http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/gis > bash / Python http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/scripting > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |