Hi All,
I want to know is there is a documentation that explains the new search capabilities (I think that this is linked with the new database model). I just compiled the latest svn version, and I tried the new search, which is very important for me. I was surprised that a lot of IPTC tag are not searchable. Before adding more comments or wishes, I prefer to get and read all related documentation if they exists. By the way, I'm really happy with digikam and i only want to share my view with you in order to make digikam better. Philippe _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Philipe,
New searches tools come from digiKam for KDE4 (0.10.0), which still under development. Current digiKam for KDE3 do not have any changes about searches tools. Best Gilles Caulier 2008/4/9, Philippe Arnone <[hidden email]>: > Hi All, > > I want to know is there is a documentation that explains the new search > capabilities (I think that this is linked with the new database model). > > I just compiled the latest svn version, and I tried the new search, which is > very important for me. I was surprised that a lot of IPTC tag are not > searchable. Before adding more comments or wishes, I prefer to get and read > all related documentation if they exists. > > By the way, I'm really happy with digikam and i only want to share my view > with you in order to make digikam better. > > Philippe > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Le Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:02:33 Gilles Caulier, vous avez écrit :
> Hi Gilles, I know that. I want to know if there is a document (even some mails) that explains what you and the team plan to do with the search. As I said, I compiled digikam 0.10 from svn and I found that the new search does not give enough possibilities. As I said, I'm ok to eplain more deeper what I want, but before saying "Hey guys, you should do that and that..", I prefer ask what you plan to do. Of course, I'm not talking about digikam 0.9.x, which has not the same database background. Philippe _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from Philippe@arnone.org
> Hi All,
> > I want to know is there is a documentation that explains the new search > capabilities (I think that this is linked with the new database model). > > I just compiled the latest svn version, and I tried the new search, which > is very important for me. I was surprised that a lot of IPTC tag are not > searchable. Before adding more comments or wishes, I prefer to get and read > all related documentation if they exists. > > By the way, I'm really happy with digikam and i only want to share my view > with you in order to make digikam better. > > Philippe There is the DBSCHEMA.ods file which describes the database and some of the intended IPTC core and Dublin Core mappings. Note that neither all these mappings are complete, nor the related search tools. I have used the XMP specification and the "IptcCore For Xmp" specification. Feel free to outline which fields you need, use cases are very welcome as well at this stage. Marcel _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Le Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:59:40 Marcel Wiesweg, vous avez écrit :
> There is the DBSCHEMA.ods file which describes the database and some of the > intended IPTC core and Dublin Core mappings. > Note that neither all these mappings are complete, nor the related search > tools. > I have used the XMP specification and the "IptcCore For Xmp" specification. > Feel free to outline which fields you need, use cases are very welcome as > well at this stage. Hi Marcel, Thank you for the link to that document. I'm going to read it and I will give you my feeback. What a shame on me, I was searching for ods and txt files but I did not see it because of the capitalized letter :( Philippe _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
File is here :
http://websvn.kde.org/*checkout*/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/DBSCHEMA.ODS?revision=726446 Gilles Caulier 2008/4/9, Philippe Arnone <[hidden email]>: > Le Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:59:40 Marcel Wiesweg, vous avez écrit : > > > There is the DBSCHEMA.ods file which describes the database and some of the > > intended IPTC core and Dublin Core mappings. > > Note that neither all these mappings are complete, nor the related search > > tools. > > I have used the XMP specification and the "IptcCore For Xmp" specification. > > Feel free to outline which fields you need, use cases are very welcome as > > well at this stage. > > > Hi Marcel, > > Thank you for the link to that document. I'm going to read it and I will give > you my feeback. > What a shame on me, I was searching for ods and txt files but I did not see it > because of the capitalized letter :( > > > Philippe > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Marcel Wiesweg
> Feel free to outline which fields you need, use cases are very welcome as > well at this stage. That goes out to others on this list as well: Tell us what you want to search; Give us usecases, and even better, two or three example photographs which have the required metadata set so that we can test. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Marcel Wiesweg
Hi all,
Sorry for the long delay between my first questions about search and my proposal. I think that the first advantage of a tool like digikam is to give users the ability to search photo within the whole collection. Depending on each user, it is quite easy to have thousands of photos to manage. That is even more easy to have a huge amount of photography if you use digikam to manage all photos taken by your family (wife, children,...). I do not want to talk about professional photographer, because I'm not one of use :) When you need to search within the thousand of photos, it is hard if you do not manage in the right way your collection. Let's say that you use IPTC to annotate the photos using all or part of IPTC fields. I think that the tool search should permit to look at any IPTC fields or Exif field. Today, it seems that it is possible to search for a lot of IPTC/XMP/Exif tags. Until now, I only found one field that is not present, but I think I know why, this field is the "Lens name". It is stored in the markernote. It seems that it is not possible to search within the markernote. Since my last comment, I played a lot with digikam 0.10 and found stuff that I did not see before. The search tool seems complete (except search in markernote). The more I use digikam, the more I enjoy it. I think that it will be hard to follow the information that can be found in the EXIF. To avoid this problem, why not imagine a "free" search for all "tags" or metadata that do not have a specific search ? It should be easy to have a free search. The user will choose the tag/metadata name trough a list built from the database (which know all names). I'm not sure that my ideas are clearly explained. Cheers, Philippe _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users signature.asc (196 bytes) Download Attachment |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |