|
Hi,
when I add a comment to a lot of images (but in recursive album view), it is done quite fast. Doing the same operation on just one album with 10times less images, it takes much longer. See the following screencast: http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/misc.tarballs/temp/metadata_writing.ogv I guess that in the first example, metadata is only written into the database? The second example writes it into the files, too? Andi _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
And of course it's the same file format as JPEG ? or a mix as PNG, TIFF, RAW ?
Exiv2 version ? Can you reproduce this duration to set comments using Exiv2 command line tool in batch ? Gilles 2009/6/29 Andi Clemens <[hidden email]>: > Hi, > > when I add a comment to a lot of images (but in recursive album view), it is > done quite fast. > Doing the same operation on just one album with 10times less images, it takes > much longer. See the following screencast: > http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/misc.tarballs/temp/metadata_writing.ogv > > I guess that in the first example, metadata is only written into the database? > The second example writes it into the files, too? > > Andi > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel > Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Yes, all are JPEGs.
My components: digiKam version 1.0.0-beta2 Exiv2 can write to Jp2: Yes Exiv2 can write to Jpeg: Yes Exiv2 can write to Pgf: No Exiv2 can write to Png: Yes Exiv2 can write to Tiff: Yes Exiv2 supports XMP metadata: Yes LibCImg: 130 LibExiv2: 0.18 LibJPEG: 62 LibJasper: 1.900.1 LibKDE: 4.2.4 (KDE 4.2.4) LibKExiv2: 1.0.0 LibKdcraw: 1.0.0 LibLCMS: 118 LibPGF: 6.09.24 LibPNG: 1.2.37 LibQt: 4.5.1 LibRaw: 0.8.0-Beta3 LibTIFF: LIBTIFF, Version 3.8.2 Copyright (c) 1988-1996 Sam Leffler Copyright (c) 1991-1996 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Marble widget: 0.7.1 Parallelized demosaicing: Yes LibGphoto2: 2.4.6 LibKipi: 0.4.0 With command line tool it takes a long time for all images (which I expected it to do), because it actually writes to all 500 files. In digiKam it seems to be just written into the database, I will need to check if I can see the comments in the files. Andi On Monday 29 June 2009 20:33:26 Gilles Caulier wrote: > And of course it's the same file format as JPEG ? or a mix as PNG, TIFF, > RAW ? > > Exiv2 version ? > > Can you reproduce this duration to set comments using Exiv2 command > line tool in batch ? > > Gilles > > 2009/6/29 Andi Clemens <[hidden email]>: > > Hi, > > > > when I add a comment to a lot of images (but in recursive album view), it > > is done quite fast. > > Doing the same operation on just one album with 10times less images, it > > takes much longer. See the following screencast: > > http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/misc.tarballs/temp/metadata_writing.ogv > > > > I guess that in the first example, metadata is only written into the > > database? The second example writes it into the files, too? > > > > Andi > > _______________________________________________ > > Digikam-devel mailing list > > [hidden email] > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
Andi,
This entry is for you: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194777 Gilles 2009/6/29 Andi Clemens <[hidden email]>: > Yes, all are JPEGs. > > My components: > > digiKam version 1.0.0-beta2 > Exiv2 can write to Jp2: Yes > Exiv2 can write to Jpeg: Yes > Exiv2 can write to Pgf: No > Exiv2 can write to Png: Yes > Exiv2 can write to Tiff: Yes > Exiv2 supports XMP metadata: Yes > LibCImg: 130 > LibExiv2: 0.18 > LibJPEG: 62 > LibJasper: 1.900.1 > LibKDE: 4.2.4 (KDE 4.2.4) > LibKExiv2: 1.0.0 > LibKdcraw: 1.0.0 > LibLCMS: 118 > LibPGF: 6.09.24 > LibPNG: 1.2.37 > LibQt: 4.5.1 > LibRaw: 0.8.0-Beta3 > LibTIFF: LIBTIFF, Version 3.8.2 Copyright (c) 1988-1996 Sam Leffler Copyright > (c) 1991-1996 Silicon Graphics, Inc. > Marble widget: 0.7.1 > Parallelized demosaicing: Yes > LibGphoto2: 2.4.6 > LibKipi: 0.4.0 > > With command line tool it takes a long time for all images (which I expected > it to do), because it actually writes to all 500 files. > > In digiKam it seems to be just written into the database, I will need to check > if I can see the comments in the files. > > Andi > > > On Monday 29 June 2009 20:33:26 Gilles Caulier wrote: >> And of course it's the same file format as JPEG ? or a mix as PNG, TIFF, >> RAW ? >> >> Exiv2 version ? >> >> Can you reproduce this duration to set comments using Exiv2 command >> line tool in batch ? >> >> Gilles >> >> 2009/6/29 Andi Clemens <[hidden email]>: >> > Hi, >> > >> > when I add a comment to a lot of images (but in recursive album view), it >> > is done quite fast. >> > Doing the same operation on just one album with 10times less images, it >> > takes much longer. See the following screencast: >> > http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/misc.tarballs/temp/metadata_writing.ogv >> > >> > I guess that in the first example, metadata is only written into the >> > database? The second example writes it into the files, too? >> > >> > Andi >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Digikam-devel mailing list >> > [hidden email] >> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-devel mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel > Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
