Metadata writing broken on recursive album view?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Metadata writing broken on recursive album view?

Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
Hi,

when I add a comment to a lot of images (but in recursive album view), it is
done quite fast.
Doing the same operation on just one album with 10times less images, it takes
much longer. See the following screencast:
http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/misc.tarballs/temp/metadata_writing.ogv

I guess that in the first example, metadata is only written into the database?
The second example writes it into the files, too?

Andi
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Metadata writing broken on recursive album view?

Gilles Caulier-4
And of course it's the same file format as JPEG ? or a mix as PNG, TIFF, RAW ?

Exiv2 version ?

Can you reproduce this duration to set comments using Exiv2 command
line tool in batch ?

Gilles

2009/6/29 Andi Clemens <[hidden email]>:

> Hi,
>
> when I add a comment to a lot of images (but in recursive album view), it is
> done quite fast.
> Doing the same operation on just one album with 10times less images, it takes
> much longer. See the following screencast:
> http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/misc.tarballs/temp/metadata_writing.ogv
>
> I guess that in the first example, metadata is only written into the database?
> The second example writes it into the files, too?
>
> Andi
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Metadata writing broken on recursive album view?

Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
Yes, all are JPEGs.

My components:

digiKam version 1.0.0-beta2
Exiv2 can write to Jp2: Yes
Exiv2 can write to Jpeg: Yes
Exiv2 can write to Pgf: No
Exiv2 can write to Png: Yes
Exiv2 can write to Tiff: Yes
Exiv2 supports XMP metadata: Yes
LibCImg: 130
LibExiv2: 0.18
LibJPEG: 62
LibJasper: 1.900.1
LibKDE: 4.2.4 (KDE 4.2.4)
LibKExiv2: 1.0.0
LibKdcraw: 1.0.0
LibLCMS: 118
LibPGF: 6.09.24
LibPNG: 1.2.37
LibQt: 4.5.1
LibRaw: 0.8.0-Beta3
LibTIFF: LIBTIFF, Version 3.8.2 Copyright (c) 1988-1996 Sam Leffler Copyright
(c) 1991-1996 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Marble widget: 0.7.1
Parallelized demosaicing: Yes
LibGphoto2: 2.4.6
LibKipi: 0.4.0

With command line tool it takes a long time for all images (which I expected
it to do), because it actually writes to all 500 files.

In digiKam it seems to be just written into the database, I will need to check
if I can see the comments in the files.

Andi


On Monday 29 June 2009 20:33:26 Gilles Caulier wrote:

> And of course it's the same file format as JPEG ? or a mix as PNG, TIFF,
> RAW ?
>
> Exiv2 version ?
>
> Can you reproduce this duration to set comments using Exiv2 command
> line tool in batch ?
>
> Gilles
>
> 2009/6/29 Andi Clemens <[hidden email]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > when I add a comment to a lot of images (but in recursive album view), it
> > is done quite fast.
> > Doing the same operation on just one album with 10times less images, it
> > takes much longer. See the following screencast:
> > http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/misc.tarballs/temp/metadata_writing.ogv
> >
> > I guess that in the first example, metadata is only written into the
> > database? The second example writes it into the files, too?
> >
> > Andi
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-devel mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Metadata writing broken on recursive album view?

Gilles Caulier-4
Andi,

This entry is for you:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194777

Gilles

2009/6/29 Andi Clemens <[hidden email]>:

> Yes, all are JPEGs.
>
> My components:
>
> digiKam version 1.0.0-beta2
> Exiv2 can write to Jp2: Yes
> Exiv2 can write to Jpeg: Yes
> Exiv2 can write to Pgf: No
> Exiv2 can write to Png: Yes
> Exiv2 can write to Tiff: Yes
> Exiv2 supports XMP metadata: Yes
> LibCImg: 130
> LibExiv2: 0.18
> LibJPEG: 62
> LibJasper: 1.900.1
> LibKDE: 4.2.4 (KDE 4.2.4)
> LibKExiv2: 1.0.0
> LibKdcraw: 1.0.0
> LibLCMS: 118
> LibPGF: 6.09.24
> LibPNG: 1.2.37
> LibQt: 4.5.1
> LibRaw: 0.8.0-Beta3
> LibTIFF: LIBTIFF, Version 3.8.2 Copyright (c) 1988-1996 Sam Leffler Copyright
> (c) 1991-1996 Silicon Graphics, Inc.
> Marble widget: 0.7.1
> Parallelized demosaicing: Yes
> LibGphoto2: 2.4.6
> LibKipi: 0.4.0
>
> With command line tool it takes a long time for all images (which I expected
> it to do), because it actually writes to all 500 files.
>
> In digiKam it seems to be just written into the database, I will need to check
> if I can see the comments in the files.
>
> Andi
>
>
> On Monday 29 June 2009 20:33:26 Gilles Caulier wrote:
>> And of course it's the same file format as JPEG ? or a mix as PNG, TIFF,
>> RAW ?
>>
>> Exiv2 version ?
>>
>> Can you reproduce this duration to set comments using Exiv2 command
>> line tool in batch ?
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> 2009/6/29 Andi Clemens <[hidden email]>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > when I add a comment to a lot of images (but in recursive album view), it
>> > is done quite fast.
>> > Doing the same operation on just one album with 10times less images, it
>> > takes much longer. See the following screencast:
>> > http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/misc.tarballs/temp/metadata_writing.ogv
>> >
>> > I guess that in the first example, metadata is only written into the
>> > database? The second example writes it into the files, too?
>> >
>> > Andi
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Digikam-devel mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel