Merry Christmas : digiKam 1.0.0 is published...

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Merry Christmas : digiKam 1.0.0 is published...

Gilles Caulier-4
Dear all digiKam fans and users!

digiKam 1.0.0 final release is published...

To read full announce, please look at:

http://www.digikam.org/node/491

Merry Christmas,

Happy New Year,

...and Happy digiKam of course...

Gilles Caulier
digiKam project
http://www.digikam.org
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merry Christmas : digiKam 1.0.0 is published...

Markus Spring
Gilles Caulier schrieb:
> digiKam 1.0.0 final release is published...

Congratulations to all the programmers and many thanks for your excellent work!

Merry Christmas to all

Markus
--
D-83435 Bad Reichenhall

Photoblog: http://markus-spring.info
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merry Christmas : digiKam 1.0.0 is published...

Brano
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
On 12/21/2009 09:47 AM, Gilles Caulier wrote:

> Dear all digiKam fans and users!
>
> digiKam 1.0.0 final release is published...
>
> To read full announce, please look at:
>
> http://www.digikam.org/node/491
>
> Merry Christmas,
>
> Happy New Year,
>
> ...and Happy digiKam of course...
>
> Gilles Caulier
>  
Thank you to all who contributed, this is the best present for Christmas ;)


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merry Christmas : digiKam 1.0.0 is published...

jdd@dodin.org
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Le 21/12/2009 15:47, Gilles Caulier a écrit :
> Dear all digiKam fans and users!
>
> digiKam 1.0.0 final release is published...
>
> To read full announce, please look at:
>
> http://www.digikam.org/node/491

thanks a lot, very good christmas gift :-)

jdd

--
http://www.dodin.net
http://valerie.dodin.org
http://news.opensuse.org/2009/04/13/people-of-opensuse-jean-daniel-dodin/
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

sharpening & noise reduction workflow

Wilkins, Vern W
In reply to this post by Brano
So I've been looking at the noise reduction options in Digikam 1.0.0 and I'm starting to wonder what the best workflow is for combining noise reduction and sharpening.  My old workflow was something similar to the following (I left out everything not related to noise reduction and sharpening).

1. Convert RAW w/ Ufraw, and minimal amount of wavelet noise reduction
2. Use refocus sharpening in Digikam, typical setting might be .80 circular sharpness, .4 correlation, .007 noise filter, 0 Gaussian sharpness, and 12 Matrix size.  The circular sharpness and noise filter are the only settings I changed often.  I'd sometimes go as high as .010 for the noise filter with high ISO images, and combine that with a lower circular sharpness.  Even with low ISO images I generally don't go less than .007 on the noise filter, but sharpness might go as high as .85.  In my experience, keeping the noise filter low, allows me to use a lower circular sharpness, and it seems that increasing the noise filter, just requires that I have to increase circular sharpness more.

Anyway, what I'm considering is using the new advanced noise reduction in Digikam 1.0.0.  So my new workflow might be something like this.

1. Convert RAW w/ Ufraw, no wavelet noise reduction
2. Use Enhance/Noise reduction in Digikam to reduce noise (what settings I don't know yet)
3. Use refocus sharpening. (settings would likely be different from previous workflow)

I'm assuming I can get better results with this method but I haven't begun to experiment with settings.  Does the order seem reasonable here?  It wouldn't make sense to sharpen before doing noise reduction would it?  Is it likely I could use a setting of 0 for the refocus noise filter, if I'm using noise reduction prior to this method of sharpening?  Anyway, I'll get back to the list when I've had more time to experiment with various combinations, but I was just curious if anyone had any good starting points, compared to what's in the handbook.  The example settings in the Digikam documentation seem relevant if you are only reducing noise, or only sharpening, but not when you are using multiple tools in your workflow.

Vern

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Merry Christmas : digiKam 1.0.0 is published...

Linuxguy123
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 15:47 +0100, Gilles Caulier wrote:

> Dear all digiKam fans and users!
>
> digiKam 1.0.0 final release is published...
>
> To read full announce, please look at:
>
> http://www.digikam.org/node/491
>
> Merry Christmas,
>
> Happy New Year,
>
> ...and Happy digiKam of course...

Great work guys.  Can't wait to try it out.

Would anyone know of where I could find a changelog versus beta 6 ?

I shot a wedding on the weekend.  I took ~600 images.  220 keepers.  I
did a slideshow with digiKam using the raws yesterday at the gift
opening.  Connected to a 57" LCD TV and let them play.  Thanks to
digiKam, I didn't have to convert them to jpegs prior to playing and it
was easy to grade each image and sort them into the slideshow list.

The wedding party was very happy with the pictures.  I couldn't have
done it without digiKam.  Everyone was shocked that I was able to do it
so quickly.  

A few weeks ago the photographer that shot my wedding was over.  I
showed him the images he shot for our wedding in digiKam.  He couldn't
believe it was free software or that it ran on Linux and how good Linux
was.  He runs hackintoshes so that he can use Apple software to handle
his images.  I sense a change is in the wind for him.

Thanks for all the hard work.

LG

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users