Merging back the model view port

[Johannes Wienke-3]

Hi @all,

is there anything to think about before merging back the model view port
into the trunk? Otherwise I would do it this weekend after the 1.1
release is done.

I plan to post an announcement about this on the users list and
digikam.org requesting testers for finding the last regressions.

Is there anything else we have to think about?

Regards,
Johannes


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

Johannes,

Nicolas Lécureil, from Mandriva, will make digiKam and kipi-plugins
tarballs sunday evening (i think, i not sure).

Of course, you need that tarballs are done to merge your branch to trunk.

Posting an annonce in digiKam.org is the best i think. Explain all,
what you want that users test, what part are changed, and use
screenshots if necessary.

After that, just use digiKam.org page to post a message to all mailing
list, and don't forget facebook groups where a lots of users are
registered.

That all i think

Gilles

2010/1/29 Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]>:

> Hi @all,
>
> is there anything to think about before merging back the model view port
> into the trunk? Otherwise I would do it this weekend after the 1.1
> release is done.
>
> I plan to post an announcement about this on the users list and
> digikam.org requesting testers for finding the last regressions.
>
> Is there anything else we have to think about?
>
> Regards,
> Johannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Marcel Wiesweg]

> Hi @all,
>
> is there anything to think about before merging back the model view port
> into the trunk? Otherwise I would do it this weekend after the 1.1
> release is done.

I have some uncommitted changes here restructuring the ImageDelegate, but I
will try to commit that tomorrow.
No objections from me.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Marcel Wiesweg]

> Is there anything else we have to think about?

A lot of debug messages need to be removed (commented out) as long as they are
not actively used for debugging:

Digikam::SearchTextBar::slotRowsInserted
Digikam::SearchTextBar::sync
Digikam::StateSavingObject::loadState
Digikam::AbstractAlbumTreeView::doLoadState
Digikam::StateSavingObject::getConfigGroup
Digikam::DateFolderView::slotSelectionChanged
Digikam::AbstractAlbumTreeView::slotFixRowsInserted
Digikam::StateSavingObject::saveState
Digikam::AbstractAlbumTreeView::doSaveState
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel