|
Hi,
Each time I update digikam to a newer version (from 0.8 to 0.9 then to 1.0, ...) all my tags and comments that I have made on photos are lost. This is now really boring as I have thousand of photos and I use tags each day to search for and categorize photos. Can someone explain me how to prevent from this ? I am using Ubuntu and I will switch to version 10.10 soon, so I would be sure to keep them this time. Thanks a lot for your help. With kind regards, Gaël. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
Having had to retag the same large set of photographs several times
over, I empathize with your situation. I'm using digikam 1.7 on Ubuntu 10.10. Instead of relying on the database remaining uncorrupted, I've been writing my tags and captions back to the images themselves. For reasons unrelated to your situation, I've deleted my digikam database several times over and started afresh. Because I've been writing the tags and captions back to the image, upon building a fresh database, all the tags and captions appear in the new database. Using exiftool, I've done a lot of testing to verify that the tags and captions are indeed being written to the images. I have jpegs from some point-and-shoot cameras, and I just let digikam write directly to these jpegs. As I have backups of all the images, and writing to jpegs is pretty safe, I wasn't afraid to risk letting digikam write to the jpegs. I also have raw (.cr2) files from a digital SLR camera. AFAIK, digikam doesn't write to .cr2 images (and I wouldn't trust it just yet, even if someone said it did, being overly cautious about such things). So I use dcraw to extract the jpeg thumb that automatically gets embedded in every raw file (exiftool and exiv2 also can extract the embedded thumbnail, and exiftool can be set up to copy ALL the raw metadata to the extracted thumb). So my raw files aren't even in my database. Rather I tag and caption and rate the extracted thumbnails and save the tags, captions, ratings to the extracted thumbnail jpegs. (How to easily coordinate retrieving the corresponding raw files is a bridge I haven't crossed yet.) As the extracted thumbs all have the extension ".thumbs.jpg", they are easy to tell apart from the point-and-shoot camera jpegs (also, I keep the point-n-shoot images and the raw-file-thumbs in separate directories). Hope some of the above might be helpful. Like yourself, I never, ever want to have to retag those images again. Elle Stone _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
