Lightroom imports

[digikam-2]

DK 5.7.app on archlinux

How does DK deals with the lightroom XMP files?

keywords, descriptions...

--
sknahT

vyS

[Mica Semrick]

It depends on exactly what fields are used by lightroom. If the fields are canonical xmp fields, which I believe they are (off the top of my head), then digikam should handle them.

Other private fields, like lightroom tool settings will likely not be used, as the tools don't map 1:1.

I'd be happy to whip up some XSLT if someone can provide sample XMP files and agree to help test.

-m

On November 8, 2017 10:55:28 AM PST, [hidden email] wrote:

DK 5.7.app on archlinux

How does DK deals with the lightroom XMP files?

keywords, descriptions...

[Syv Ritch]

On Wed, 08 Nov 2017 10:59:35 -0800
Mica Semrick <[hidden email]> wrote:

> It depends on exactly what fields are used by lightroom. If the
> fields are canonical xmp fields, which I believe they are (off the
> top of my head), then digikam should handle them.
>
> Other private fields, like lightroom tool settings will likely not
> be used, as the tools don't map 1:1.
>
> I'd be happy to whip up some XSLT if someone can provide sample XMP
> files and agree to help test.

Here's the image (raw) and the lightroom xmp (v5.7.1)

https://drive.google.com/open?id=18vDXvg55dxF0g3cxzHM8hRSumbtSADGI

and

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PEa55wJkThsKBYuVpThVET18_usFnxY3


--
Thanks
http://www.sritch.com
The Dogs of Vancouver

[Mica Semrick]

xmp:rating should be handled correctly. I didn't see a keyword tag in there, so it appears the xmp doesn't have it.

On November 8, 2017 11:19:09 AM PST, ~Syv Ritch~ <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Wed, 08 Nov 2017 10:59:35 -0800
Mica Semrick <[hidden email]> wrote:

 It depends on exactly what fields are used by lightroom. If the
 fields are canonical xmp fields, which I believe they are (off the
 top of my head), then digikam should handle them.
 
 Other private fields, like lightroom tool settings will likely not
 be used, as the tools don't map 1:1.
 
 I'd be happy to whip up some XSLT if someone can provide sample XMP
 files and agree to help test.

Here's the image (raw) and the lightroom xmp (v5.7.1)

https://drive.google.com/open?id=18vDXvg55dxF0g3cxzHM8hRSumbtSADGI

and

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PEa55wJkThsKBYuVpThVET18_usFnxY3

[digikam-2]

On Wed, 08 Nov 2017 12:11:49 -0800
Mica Semrick <[hidden email]> wrote:

> xmp:rating should be handled correctly. I didn't see a keyword tag
> in there, so it appears the xmp doesn't have it.


Here is another one:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PEa55wJkThsKBYuVpThVET18_usFnxY3

with title/description....

sknahT

vyS

>
> On November 8, 2017 11:19:09 AM PST, ~Syv Ritch~ <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >On Wed, 08 Nov 2017 10:59:35 -0800
> >Mica Semrick <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >  
> >> It depends on exactly what fields are used by lightroom. If the
> >> fields are canonical xmp fields, which I believe they are (off
> >> the top of my head), then digikam should handle them.
> >>
> >> Other private fields, like lightroom tool settings will likely
> >> not be used, as the tools don't map 1:1.
> >>
> >> I'd be happy to whip up some XSLT if someone can provide sample
> >> XMP files and agree to help test.  
> >
> >Here's the image (raw) and the lightroom xmp (v5.7.1)
> >
> >https://drive.google.com/open?id=18vDXvg55dxF0g3cxzHM8hRSumbtSADGI
> >
> >and
> >
> >https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PEa55wJkThsKBYuVpThVET18_usFnxY3
> >
> >
> >--
> >Thanks
> >http://www.sritch.com
> >The Dogs of Vancouver  

--
sknahT

vyS