Images not visible on Light Table

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
23 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Images not visible on Light Table

pshute
It's interesting the different priorities people have for software. In trying to find recommendations for software like this, many people seem fixated on whether or not it can process RAW, and nothing else.

I don't use RAW, but the side by side compare, with synchronised zoom, is a primary consideration.

I use it for bird photography, where most photos must be heavily cropped. I can't tell which photos are the best focused without side by side zooming.

Lightroom is near perfect for what I want. To see 4 side by side would be better, but you can't have everything.  My trial expires in 3 weeks ...

I'm hoping digiKam will be as good. The only thing I see missing so far is a dual rating system. Lightroom has a number and a colour rating. I can use one to rate focus, and one to rate pose, then filter for the best of each.  I can probably use a tag for this instead.

Apologies for top posting. I'm on my Blackberry, it's the only way possible.


--------------------------
Sent using BlackBerry

----- Original Message -----
From: Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>
To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <[hidden email]>
Sent: Sat Dec 12 22:55:39 2009
Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] Images not visible on Light Table

2009/12/12 jdd <[hidden email]>:
> Le 12/12/2009 12:27, Laurent Espitallier a écrit :
>
>> I use it to compare similar series of photos and keep or post process
>> only the one I prefer.
>>
>> Don't know if there is any other usage.
>
> I do the same, but in the editor. I prefere to have the largest
> possible view to choose

It's not enough. You cannot compare side by side at the same time.
Both panel in Light table are synchronized for panning and zooming !
you can check details in-deep and see which item is better to post
process.

Image can be loaded in full size in Light Table. There is an option in
digiKam setup panel...

Gilles


>
> I only wondered if this function is unavoidable and to know if I miss
> a usefull function (I know I miss many new features, because I use
> digikam for several years now and I'm not aware of all what is new)
>
> jdd
>
> --
> http://www.dodin.net
> http://valerie.dodin.org
> http://news.opensuse.org/2009/04/13/people-of-opensuse-jean-daniel-dodin/
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Images not visible on Light Table

pshute
In reply to this post by pshute
That's excellent that it's already fixed.

To work out how to get code out of SVN is a project for me, let alone compiling it.
I'm afraid I barely know where to start.


--------------------------
Sent using BlackBerry

----- Original Message -----
From: Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>
To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the power of open source <[hidden email]>
Sent: Sat Dec 12 22:38:31 2009
Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] Images not visible on Light Table

2009/12/12 Andi Clemens <[hidden email]>:
> Just because you don't use / understand it, it doesn't make the LightTable
> useless for everyone. :-)
>
> Anyway I just compiled trunk again under Windows (don't do this too often
> because it is so slow) and it works just fine here.
>
> Andi  Clemens

Thanks Andi to test it under Windows.

Peter, using current code from svn is the solution for you...

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Images not visible on Light Table

pshute
In reply to this post by pshute
Thank you for that. KDE 4.3.4 is what I installed. I might try 4.3.3 and see if there's an improvement, if I get around to it before it's fixed.


--------------------------
Sent using BlackBerry

----- Original Message -----
From: Laurent Espitallier <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
Sent: Sat Dec 12 21:48:37 2009
Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] Images not visible on Light Table

This is really annoying, however if you could fix it next week, that
would be wonderful !

Some users in my company will use digiKam to manage their photo
collection instead of Adobe Lightroom 2.0.

Patrick Spendin said the 8/12/2009 on kde-windows mailing list :

Hi all,

I am just giving you a short note that KDE 4.3.4 has been uploaded now.

It is based on the latest release of Qt 4.6.0; This also means that some
packages from the earlier 4.3.3 release might break (due to a packaging
error in the 4.3.3 release).
It includes a package of the koffice suite in version 2.1.0, a new
konversation package in version 1.2.1, a ktorrent package in version 3.3.1.

If you'd like to see other packages with recent releases (from extragear
etc.), just give us a hint here.

I will add the digikam 1.0.0 release next week.


Le 12/12/2009 09:53, Gilles Caulier a écrit :

> Peter,
>
> If you is able to compile digiKam under windows, it will be better to
> checkout code from svn trunk and to try as well.
>
> This week end i will be busy.... Christmas time arrive and i need to
> prepare the event. But next week, i can take a look at this bug. I
> think it just a little dysfunction somewhere... because it work fine
> with previous version 1.0.0-beta. It must be fixed for 1.0.0 final...
>
> Also, please create a new entry in KDE bugzilla, at digiKam/lighttable section.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2009/12/12 jdd-gmane<[hidden email]>:
>    
>> Le 12/12/2009 07:31, Peter Shute a �crit :
>>      
>>> If a bug that serious is well known but there's no bug offically submitted then it sounds like the Windows version is definitely to be avoided.
>>>
>>> Can anyone recommend which Linux distribution to try? �I've never used any of them before. This poll suggests Ubuntu is most popular, but I don't know how old it is:
>>> http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/188
>>>        
>> I use and like openSUSE for years now
>>
>> http://www.opensuse.org/fr/
>>
>> jdd
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.dodin.net
>> http://valerie.dodin.org
>> http://news.opensuse.org/2009/04/13/people-of-opensuse-jean-daniel-dodin/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>    



_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
12