I've setup the metadata so image title, description and tags are written in the file. But using exiv2, I only find the tags; title is nowhere to be seen, though I'm pretty sure it worked in the past (I need the title in the IPTC, so it can automatically be published in my online gallery). Something has changed, or I am missing something?_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Hi, No, nothing has changed about this feature, as i know... Please, check your settings in Metadata control panel. Didi you use XMP sidecar ? Which Exiv2 version you use ? Didi you enable the right option to write comment in image ? Gilles Caulier 2015-10-18 4:47 GMT+02:00 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
2015-10-18 10:59 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:
Étiquettes d'images Légende et titre Note Modèles de métadonnées are checked. The others elements (Libelle de désignation, Libellé de couleur, Horodatages and Étiquettes des visages) are not.
Écrire dans les fichiers associés is cheked and Écrire dans l'image et le fichier associé à XMP is selected.
Nom : exiv2 Architectur : x86_64 Époque : 0 Version : 0.24 Révision : 4.fc22 Taille : 205 k Dépôt : @System Résumé : Exif and Iptc metadata manipulation library URL : http://www.exiv2.org/ Licence : GPLv2+ Description : A command line utility to access image metadata, allowing one to: : * print the Exif metadata of Jpeg images as summary info, : interpreted values, or the plain data for each tag : * print the Iptc metadata of Jpeg images : * print the Jpeg comment of Jpeg images : * set, add and delete Exif and Iptc metadata of Jpeg images : * adjust the Exif timestamp (that's how it all started...) : * rename Exif image files according to the Exif timestamp : * extract, insert and delete Exif metadata (including thumbnails), : Iptc metadata and Jpeg comments and the Digikam LibKExiv2 version is 2.4.0
See the answer above. Thanks, Marie-Noëlle -- et aussi sur Facebook : _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
I suspect a problem with ACDSee XMP tags not supported by Exiv2 0.24, as reported in this file : The introduction of this namespace as several side effects everywhere. Using Exiv2 0.25 fix the problem. In fact 0.25 release is so far better than 0.24 where a lots of crash have been fixed. Gilles 2015-10-18 14:00 GMT+02:00 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
The new version doesn't seem to be in Fedora repos yet. Do you know when it has been released (approximatively)? Marie-Noëlle2015-10-18 14:29 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:
-- et aussi sur Facebook : _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
2015-10-18 14:37 GMT+02:00 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Strange it is not in the repos... I have posted a question in the Fedora forum. Marie-Noëlle_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
To be clear, your problem is described in this file : Gilles 2015-10-18 14:40 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by tosca
exiv2 0.25 was packaged for Fedora 3 months ago, perhaps it has not
filtered down to the version of Fedora you are using? https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/exiv2/builds/ 2015-10-18 7:53 GMT-05:00 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>: > Strange it is not in the repos... I have posted a question in the Fedora > forum. > > Marie-Noëlle _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Thanks for the information. Apparently, the new exiv2 version is available for Fedora 23... that is not released yet!2015-10-18 14:54 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:
-- et aussi sur Facebook : _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Alan Pater
Okay, looks like exiv2 0.25 is in Fedora 23, which is due to be
released at the end of this month. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/23/Schedule On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Alan Pater <[hidden email]> wrote: > exiv2 0.25 was packaged for Fedora 3 months ago, perhaps it has not > filtered down to the version of Fedora you are using? > > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/exiv2/builds/ > > 2015-10-18 7:53 GMT-05:00 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>: >> Strange it is not in the repos... I have posted a question in the Fedora >> forum. >> >> Marie-Noëlle Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
I usually wait a couple of months before upgrading to a new distro version. So I'd rather they publish the last exiv2 version in Fedora 22, which is the current release. Marie-Noëlle2015-10-18 15:31 GMT+02:00 Alan Pater <[hidden email]>: Okay, looks like exiv2 0.25 is in Fedora 23, which is due to be -- et aussi sur Facebook : _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
On 10/18/2015 03:33 PM, Marie-Noëlle Augendre wrote:
> I usually wait a couple of months before upgrading to a new distro > version. So I'd rather they publish the last exiv2 version in Fedora 22, > which is the current release. I use Fedora 23 now (upgraded beta version), it works, DK works 'normaly'. You have to wait 5 days to get stable release :) -- Maderios _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
I won't upgrade Fedora before it'll be a couple of months old. So I'd rather the new exiv2 version is available in F22. Marie-Noëlle2015-10-22 21:57 GMT+02:00 maderios <[hidden email]>: On 10/18/2015 03:33 PM, Marie-Noëlle Augendre wrote: -- et aussi sur Facebook : _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
On 10/22/2015 11:52 PM, Marie-Noëlle Augendre wrote:
> I won't upgrade Fedora before it'll be a couple of months old. So I'd > rather the new exiv2 version is available in F22. I think exiv2-025 never come in F22. Besides, stable F23 has been delayed: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-23-Delayed -- Maderios _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |