Image quality sorter broken?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Image quality sorter broken?

Robert Susmilch
Was running digikam 4.0.0 on Fedora 20 x64. "Upgraded" to digikam git
version. Just downloaded and compiled digikam 4.1.0 last night. In non
of these does image quality sorter assign any labels. I can assign
Rejected, etc labels and they show up on the images and search, but
after waiting for image quality sorter to do it's thing nothing has
changed.  I am using the default settings, am I doing something wrong or
is it truly that broken?

Robert
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Image quality sorter broken?

Gilles Caulier-4
hi,

i'm sure that nothing has changed in this part since 4.0.0

The only dependency used by this tool is OpenCV. digiKam 4.1.0 now
require OpenCV 2.4.9 to be sure that libkface do not crash. Perhaps
the problem is here...

Gilles Caulier

2014-07-01 21:40 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <[hidden email]>:

> Was running digikam 4.0.0 on Fedora 20 x64. "Upgraded" to digikam git
> version. Just downloaded and compiled digikam 4.1.0 last night. In non of
> these does image quality sorter assign any labels. I can assign Rejected,
> etc labels and they show up on the images and search, but after waiting for
> image quality sorter to do it's thing nothing has changed.  I am using the
> default settings, am I doing something wrong or is it truly that broken?
>
> Robert
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Image quality sorter broken?

Robert Susmilch
I have OpenCV 2.4.9 installed from source since the git version. Face
detection worked in all digikam versions 4.0.0 and git, trying 4.1.0
now.  It never seemed to recognize faces and auto tag them even though I
had 200+ of my 18 month old son tagged, think last I heard it was broken.

I guess my questions are, does image quality sorter work for anyone? I
tried it on a small album, nothing...
Facial recognition automatic tagging broken still (since you brought up
libkface?)

Robert

On 07/01/2014 02:58 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:

> hi,
>
> i'm sure that nothing has changed in this part since 4.0.0
>
> The only dependency used by this tool is OpenCV. digiKam 4.1.0 now
> require OpenCV 2.4.9 to be sure that libkface do not crash. Perhaps
> the problem is here...
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2014-07-01 21:40 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <[hidden email]>:
>> Was running digikam 4.0.0 on Fedora 20 x64. "Upgraded" to digikam git
>> version. Just downloaded and compiled digikam 4.1.0 last night. In non of
>> these does image quality sorter assign any labels. I can assign Rejected,
>> etc labels and they show up on the images and search, but after waiting for
>> image quality sorter to do it's thing nothing has changed.  I am using the
>> default settings, am I doing something wrong or is it truly that broken?
>>
>> Robert
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Image quality sorter broken?

Andreas Mair-2
Hi,

I've been trying to find out how to use the Image Quality Sorter since
4.0.0-beta3 but I've never found out how it works.
I've now tried again using digiKam 4.1.0 and OpenCV 2.4.9 (if that
matters), but still can't see any result.

Maybe I'm doing something wrong?
I open the maintenance tool, tick "Whole album collection", set "Scan
mode" to "Clean all and re-scan", settings are at the defaults. It
takes some time while the tool is processing the images. After that I
try to find any image that has a label using the "Filters" sidebar but
I can't find a single one.

Any ideas or howtos?

Best regards,
Andreas



2014-07-01 22:19 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <[hidden email]>:

> I have OpenCV 2.4.9 installed from source since the git version. Face
> detection worked in all digikam versions 4.0.0 and git, trying 4.1.0 now.
> It never seemed to recognize faces and auto tag them even though I had 200+
> of my 18 month old son tagged, think last I heard it was broken.
>
> I guess my questions are, does image quality sorter work for anyone? I tried
> it on a small album, nothing...
> Facial recognition automatic tagging broken still (since you brought up
> libkface?)
>
> Robert
>
>
> On 07/01/2014 02:58 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> i'm sure that nothing has changed in this part since 4.0.0
>>
>> The only dependency used by this tool is OpenCV. digiKam 4.1.0 now
>> require OpenCV 2.4.9 to be sure that libkface do not crash. Perhaps
>> the problem is here...
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> 2014-07-01 21:40 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <[hidden email]>:
>>>
>>> Was running digikam 4.0.0 on Fedora 20 x64. "Upgraded" to digikam git
>>> version. Just downloaded and compiled digikam 4.1.0 last night. In non of
>>> these does image quality sorter assign any labels. I can assign Rejected,
>>> etc labels and they show up on the images and search, but after waiting
>>> for
>>> image quality sorter to do it's thing nothing has changed.  I am using
>>> the
>>> default settings, am I doing something wrong or is it truly that broken?
>>>
>>> Robert
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Image quality sorter broken?

Gilles Caulier-4
Quality scan result assign automatically Pick labels accordingly with
Quality Sorting setting from digiKam config panel.

Do you set you Quality configuration ?

After, to find item Picked, just use advance search tool.

Gilles Caulier

2014-07-03 9:03 GMT+02:00 Andreas Mair <[hidden email]>:

> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to find out how to use the Image Quality Sorter since
> 4.0.0-beta3 but I've never found out how it works.
> I've now tried again using digiKam 4.1.0 and OpenCV 2.4.9 (if that
> matters), but still can't see any result.
>
> Maybe I'm doing something wrong?
> I open the maintenance tool, tick "Whole album collection", set "Scan
> mode" to "Clean all and re-scan", settings are at the defaults. It
> takes some time while the tool is processing the images. After that I
> try to find any image that has a label using the "Filters" sidebar but
> I can't find a single one.
>
> Any ideas or howtos?
>
> Best regards,
> Andreas
>
>
>
> 2014-07-01 22:19 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <[hidden email]>:
>> I have OpenCV 2.4.9 installed from source since the git version. Face
>> detection worked in all digikam versions 4.0.0 and git, trying 4.1.0 now.
>> It never seemed to recognize faces and auto tag them even though I had 200+
>> of my 18 month old son tagged, think last I heard it was broken.
>>
>> I guess my questions are, does image quality sorter work for anyone? I tried
>> it on a small album, nothing...
>> Facial recognition automatic tagging broken still (since you brought up
>> libkface?)
>>
>> Robert
>>
>>
>> On 07/01/2014 02:58 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> i'm sure that nothing has changed in this part since 4.0.0
>>>
>>> The only dependency used by this tool is OpenCV. digiKam 4.1.0 now
>>> require OpenCV 2.4.9 to be sure that libkface do not crash. Perhaps
>>> the problem is here...
>>>
>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>
>>> 2014-07-01 21:40 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <[hidden email]>:
>>>>
>>>> Was running digikam 4.0.0 on Fedora 20 x64. "Upgraded" to digikam git
>>>> version. Just downloaded and compiled digikam 4.1.0 last night. In non of
>>>> these does image quality sorter assign any labels. I can assign Rejected,
>>>> etc labels and they show up on the images and search, but after waiting
>>>> for
>>>> image quality sorter to do it's thing nothing has changed.  I am using
>>>> the
>>>> default settings, am I doing something wrong or is it truly that broken?
>>>>
>>>> Robert
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Image quality sorter broken?

Gilles Caulier-4
Later, we will able to use this king of new Labels quick search
tree-view and forget advanced search tool :

http://mohamedanwer.wordpress.com/2014/07/02/what-have-been-done-so-far-with-digikam/

Gilles Caulier

2014-07-03 9:12 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:

> Quality scan result assign automatically Pick labels accordingly with
> Quality Sorting setting from digiKam config panel.
>
> Do you set you Quality configuration ?
>
> After, to find item Picked, just use advance search tool.
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2014-07-03 9:03 GMT+02:00 Andreas Mair <[hidden email]>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been trying to find out how to use the Image Quality Sorter since
>> 4.0.0-beta3 but I've never found out how it works.
>> I've now tried again using digiKam 4.1.0 and OpenCV 2.4.9 (if that
>> matters), but still can't see any result.
>>
>> Maybe I'm doing something wrong?
>> I open the maintenance tool, tick "Whole album collection", set "Scan
>> mode" to "Clean all and re-scan", settings are at the defaults. It
>> takes some time while the tool is processing the images. After that I
>> try to find any image that has a label using the "Filters" sidebar but
>> I can't find a single one.
>>
>> Any ideas or howtos?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Andreas
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-07-01 22:19 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <[hidden email]>:
>>> I have OpenCV 2.4.9 installed from source since the git version. Face
>>> detection worked in all digikam versions 4.0.0 and git, trying 4.1.0 now.
>>> It never seemed to recognize faces and auto tag them even though I had 200+
>>> of my 18 month old son tagged, think last I heard it was broken.
>>>
>>> I guess my questions are, does image quality sorter work for anyone? I tried
>>> it on a small album, nothing...
>>> Facial recognition automatic tagging broken still (since you brought up
>>> libkface?)
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/01/2014 02:58 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>
>>>> hi,
>>>>
>>>> i'm sure that nothing has changed in this part since 4.0.0
>>>>
>>>> The only dependency used by this tool is OpenCV. digiKam 4.1.0 now
>>>> require OpenCV 2.4.9 to be sure that libkface do not crash. Perhaps
>>>> the problem is here...
>>>>
>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>
>>>> 2014-07-01 21:40 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Was running digikam 4.0.0 on Fedora 20 x64. "Upgraded" to digikam git
>>>>> version. Just downloaded and compiled digikam 4.1.0 last night. In non of
>>>>> these does image quality sorter assign any labels. I can assign Rejected,
>>>>> etc labels and they show up on the images and search, but after waiting
>>>>> for
>>>>> image quality sorter to do it's thing nothing has changed.  I am using
>>>>> the
>>>>> default settings, am I doing something wrong or is it truly that broken?
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Image quality sorter broken?

Andreas Mair-2
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Hi Gilles,

yes, I enabled the "Image Quality Sorter" and use its default settings.
But I can't find any labeled image.

Maybe an unmet external dependency?

Best regards,
Andreas



2014-07-03 9:12 GMT+02:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:

> Quality scan result assign automatically Pick labels accordingly with
> Quality Sorting setting from digiKam config panel.
>
> Do you set you Quality configuration ?
>
> After, to find item Picked, just use advance search tool.
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2014-07-03 9:03 GMT+02:00 Andreas Mair <[hidden email]>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been trying to find out how to use the Image Quality Sorter since
>> 4.0.0-beta3 but I've never found out how it works.
>> I've now tried again using digiKam 4.1.0 and OpenCV 2.4.9 (if that
>> matters), but still can't see any result.
>>
>> Maybe I'm doing something wrong?
>> I open the maintenance tool, tick "Whole album collection", set "Scan
>> mode" to "Clean all and re-scan", settings are at the defaults. It
>> takes some time while the tool is processing the images. After that I
>> try to find any image that has a label using the "Filters" sidebar but
>> I can't find a single one.
>>
>> Any ideas or howtos?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Andreas
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-07-01 22:19 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <[hidden email]>:
>>> I have OpenCV 2.4.9 installed from source since the git version. Face
>>> detection worked in all digikam versions 4.0.0 and git, trying 4.1.0 now.
>>> It never seemed to recognize faces and auto tag them even though I had 200+
>>> of my 18 month old son tagged, think last I heard it was broken.
>>>
>>> I guess my questions are, does image quality sorter work for anyone? I tried
>>> it on a small album, nothing...
>>> Facial recognition automatic tagging broken still (since you brought up
>>> libkface?)
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/01/2014 02:58 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>
>>>> hi,
>>>>
>>>> i'm sure that nothing has changed in this part since 4.0.0
>>>>
>>>> The only dependency used by this tool is OpenCV. digiKam 4.1.0 now
>>>> require OpenCV 2.4.9 to be sure that libkface do not crash. Perhaps
>>>> the problem is here...
>>>>
>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>
>>>> 2014-07-01 21:40 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Was running digikam 4.0.0 on Fedora 20 x64. "Upgraded" to digikam git
>>>>> version. Just downloaded and compiled digikam 4.1.0 last night. In non of
>>>>> these does image quality sorter assign any labels. I can assign Rejected,
>>>>> etc labels and they show up on the images and search, but after waiting
>>>>> for
>>>>> image quality sorter to do it's thing nothing has changed.  I am using
>>>>> the
>>>>> default settings, am I doing something wrong or is it truly that broken?
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Image quality sorter broken?

Andreas Mair-2
In reply to this post by Robert Susmilch
Hi,

I think this question is still open:

2014-07-01 22:19 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <[hidden email]>:
> I guess my questions are, does image quality sorter work for anyone? I tried

Well, I must say that I can't get it to work, I don't see any results.
I tried v4.0.0 and 4.1.0. I've already included some kDebug()
statements and looked at the log, but I can't see that
ImgQSort::startAnalyse() (where I added the kDebug()) is called.

So I really wonder if it works for anybody or if I have to dig deeper
to find out what's going wrong at my side.

Best regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Image quality sorter broken?

Robert Susmilch
Yes, I never got an answer, seems to do absolutely nothing, and takes forever to process images as well!

On July 6, 2014 5:08:12 AM CDT, Andreas Mair <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I think this question is still open:

2014-07-01 22:19 GMT+02:00 Robert Susmilch <[hidden email]>:
I guess my questions are, does image quality sorter work for anyone? I tried

Well, I must say that I can't get it to work, I don't see any results.
I tried v4.0.0 and 4.1.0. I've already included some kDebug()
statements and looked at the log, but I can't see that
ImgQSort::startAnalyse() (where I added the kDebug()) is called.

So I really wonder if it works for anybody or if I have to dig deeper
to find out what's going wrong at my side.

Best regards,
Andreas


Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users

--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users