Is there a way to batch enter the image file name into the IPTC title field (that is, not by copy/paste on an image by image basis)?
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
On 12/11/12 10:38, Mike Morris wrote:
> Is there a way to batch enter the image file name into the IPTC title > field (that is, not by copy/paste on an image by image basis)? > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Mike, Use exiv2 http://www.exiv2.org/sample.html or exiftools http://owl.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ depending on the OS you are using -- Cheers Simon Simon Cropper - Open Content Creator Free and Open Source Software Workflow Guides ------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction http://www.fossworkflowguides.com GIS Packages http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/gis bash / Python http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/scripting _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
On a somewhat related note, does anyone else besides me think the
digiKam interface implies that the XMP-dc Title and the IPTC Object Name (also referred to as the IPTC Title) should hold image description synopsis information, rather than identifying information such as the file name? The proper metadata fields form image description synopsis are the ITPC Headline and the XMP-photoshop Headline fields, which is what I would expect to find in the right-side pane "Captions/Tags-Description" tab. But in fact anything entered Description/Title actually gets written to Title metadata fields. If digiKam really means "Title" (eg file name) should be entered here, then there would seem to be no easy way to enter an image headline/synopsis. http://www.photometadata.org/META-Resources-Field-Guide-to-Metadata#Title http://www.photometadata.org/META-Resources-Field-Guide-to-Metadata#Headline http://www.exiv2.org/tags-xmp-dc.html http://www.exiv2.org/tags-xmp-photoshop.html On a more related note, Exiftool works with Linux, Windows, and Mac, and I'm pretty sure Exiv2 does also. Kindest regards, Elle -- http://ninedegreesbelow.com Articles and tutorials on open source digital imaging and photography _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Hello... On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Elle Stone wrote: > On a somewhat related note, does anyone else besides me think the > digiKam interface implies that the XMP-dc Title and the IPTC Object > Name (also referred to as the IPTC Title) should hold image > description synopsis information, rather than identifying information > such as the file name? I think too. The major reason - from my point of view - is that the filename is already known to DK. With fresh new imported images, it's already possible to do a search on filename(s). Hand editing information should then add extra information, not eisting one. > The proper metadata fields form image description synopsis are the > ITPC Headline and the XMP-photoshop Headline fields, which is what I > would expect to find in the right-side pane > "Captions/Tags-Description" tab. But in fact anything entered > Description/Title actually gets written to Title metadata fields. You're perfectly right. Strictly speaking what you call « image description synopsis » is the exact description of the IPTC Headline. -- Cf. : Headline [IPTC Core] -- the Headline should grab attention and summarize the image's content. Aside from that, the Dublin Core standard gives a poor and misty definition, cf. : -- http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/ -- Term Name: title -- Definition: A name given to the resource. -- Comment: Typically, a Title will be a name by which the resource is formally known. Ehm, formally known ? Should rather be an URI than a filename (IMHO) > If digiKam really means "Title" (eg file name) should be entered here, > then there would seem to be no easy way to enter an image > headline/synopsis. Right again. And that's probably why it's up to users to know what they want to keep along with the image. Headline and Description are important features for an image. And this requires user input, there no automatic way for a software to guess that such or such picture represent « Sonia's wedding » or « Children at play ». Probably it's just a matter of names. The DK GUI labels the fields Title and Caption, but we can think as Headline and Description. So what ? Probably the places, the fields where to store data isn't that important as long as applications that use data can find it. Regards, Jean-François _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |