Handbook
Locked
 
|
Hi,
is the handbook dead? I have the impression there isn't going on much anymore. I'm looking at the current checkout and it is in most parts behind digiKam-0.10. I'd like to at least update all the screenshots, I extracted the ones in my local git branch that need to be re-captured, some of them still show old KDE3 digiKam functions. When we are going to release 1.0.0, we should at least have a newer visual style in the handbook :-) Adding actual content is the other part of course, but since I'm not a good writer, I can not contribute in that way. Andi _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
|
Well, until now, it's maintained by Gerhard Kulzer...
Gilles 2009/10/13 Andi Clemens <[hidden email]>: > Hi, > > is the handbook dead? I have the impression there isn't going on much anymore. > I'm looking at the current checkout and it is in most parts behind > digiKam-0.10. > I'd like to at least update all the screenshots, I extracted the ones in my > local git branch that need to be re-captured, some of them still show old KDE3 > digiKam functions. > When we are going to release 1.0.0, we should at least have a newer visual > style in the handbook :-) > Adding actual content is the other part of course, but since I'm not a good > writer, I can not contribute in that way. > > Andi > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel > Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Re: Handbook
|
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
It would be really nice to have an updated handbook here for the 1.0.0
release. It is far too old, but unfortunately I'm not a good writer (and I don't have so much time either right now). A lot of users are already complaining, for example: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digikam-doc/+bug/381077 Sure, it is OpenSource and people need to spent their free time for it, but most of the handbook content just doesn't fit anymore. If no one has time to manage it at the moment, maybe we should start a blog entry asking for help here? Andi On Tuesday 13 October 2009 19:40:07 Andi Clemens wrote: > Hi, > > is the handbook dead? I have the impression there isn't going on much > anymore. I'm looking at the current checkout and it is in most parts > behind digiKam-0.10. > I'd like to at least update all the screenshots, I extracted the ones in my > local git branch that need to be re-captured, some of them still show old > KDE3 digiKam functions. > When we are going to release 1.0.0, we should at least have a newer visual > style in the handbook :-) > Adding actual content is the other part of course, but since I'm not a good > writer, I can not contribute in that way. > > Andi > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel > Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
|
On Facebook i registered more than 1000 peoples from FOSS world. I can
post a request there with a link to digikam.org page explaining the problem... Gilles 2009/11/12 Andi Clemens <[hidden email]>: > It would be really nice to have an updated handbook here for the 1.0.0 > release. > It is far too old, but unfortunately I'm not a good writer (and I don't have > so much time either right now). > A lot of users are already complaining, for example: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digikam-doc/+bug/381077 > > Sure, it is OpenSource and people need to spent their free time for it, but > most of the handbook content just doesn't fit anymore. > > If no one has time to manage it at the moment, maybe we should start a blog > entry asking for help here? > > Andi > > On Tuesday 13 October 2009 19:40:07 Andi Clemens wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is the handbook dead? I have the impression there isn't going on much >> anymore. I'm looking at the current checkout and it is in most parts >> behind digiKam-0.10. >> I'd like to at least update all the screenshots, I extracted the ones in my >> local git branch that need to be re-captured, some of them still show old >> KDE3 digiKam functions. >> When we are going to release 1.0.0, we should at least have a newer visual >> style in the handbook :-) >> Adding actual content is the other part of course, but since I'm not a good >> writer, I can not contribute in that way. >> >> Andi >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-devel mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-devel mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel > Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
«
Return to digikam-devel
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |