Gamma on Linux

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Gamma on Linux

Leonardo Giordani-2
Hi all,

I'm trying to understand the gamma tuning of Linux: I always read on
Internet that we aim at gamma 2.2, but if I set Gamma 2.2 through
xgamma, I get a way too bright monitor, I cannot even see black. The
best value (without real calibration) is 1.0 (xgamma -gamma 1.0).

I'm a bit puzzled by this: what is the nominal gamma of my monitor (a
Samsung SyncMaster, so a very common one)? If it is 2.2 why shall I
set it to 1.0?

Any help or suggestion?
Thanks in advance

Leonardo
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Gamma on Linux

Bartek Pietrasiak
You wan't to correct the signal in order to make the display be 2.2. Read: http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/113936

2010/2/3 Leonardo Giordani <[hidden email]>
Hi all,

I'm trying to understand the gamma tuning of Linux: I always read on
Internet that we aim at gamma 2.2, but if I set Gamma 2.2 through
xgamma, I get a way too bright monitor, I cannot even see black. The
best value (without real calibration) is 1.0 (xgamma -gamma 1.0).

I'm a bit puzzled by this: what is the nominal gamma of my monitor (a
Samsung SyncMaster, so a very common one)? If it is 2.2 why shall I
set it to 1.0?

Any help or suggestion?
Thanks in advance

Leonardo
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Gamma on Linux

Milan Knížek
In reply to this post by Leonardo Giordani-2
Leonardo Giordani píše v St 03. 02. 2010 v 16:22 +0100:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to understand the gamma tuning of Linux: I always read on
> Internet that we aim at gamma 2.2, but if I set Gamma 2.2 through
> xgamma, I get a way too bright monitor, I cannot even see black. The
> best value (without real calibration) is 1.0 (xgamma -gamma 1.0).

Your monitor has definitely native gamma around 2.4 - 2.5. Higher native
gamma results in darker mid-tones.

xgamma (or setting in /etc/X11/xorg.conf or the video driver tools like
nvidia-settings panel) tells X server to change the gamma of video card
LUT (look-up-table). Adjustments bigger then 1 make the mid-tones
lighter.

Additionally, there are tools (xcalib, dispwin) which can do finer
adjustments to the video card LUT then just the simple xgamma. However,
one needs to use a calibration device.

What you finally see on your screen is a result of monitor's native
gamma and any gamma adjustments to video card LUT. (Monitor gamma
divided by LUT gamma.)

> I'm a bit puzzled by this: what is the nominal gamma of my monitor (a
> Samsung SyncMaster, so a very common one)? If it is 2.2 why shall I
> set it to 1.0?

The various tools for gamma adjustments do not tell you what is the
visual gamma, but only what gamma adjustment is done to LUT.

regards,

Milan Knizek
knizek (dot) confy (at) volny (dot) cz
http://www.milan-knizek.net - About linux and photography (Czech
language only)

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Gamma on Linux

Leonardo Giordani-2
Thank you, now the whole thing is clear :)

2010/2/3 Milan Knížek <[hidden email]>:

> Leonardo Giordani píše v St 03. 02. 2010 v 16:22 +0100:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to understand the gamma tuning of Linux: I always read on
>> Internet that we aim at gamma 2.2, but if I set Gamma 2.2 through
>> xgamma, I get a way too bright monitor, I cannot even see black. The
>> best value (without real calibration) is 1.0 (xgamma -gamma 1.0).
>
> Your monitor has definitely native gamma around 2.4 - 2.5. Higher native
> gamma results in darker mid-tones.
>
> xgamma (or setting in /etc/X11/xorg.conf or the video driver tools like
> nvidia-settings panel) tells X server to change the gamma of video card
> LUT (look-up-table). Adjustments bigger then 1 make the mid-tones
> lighter.
>
> Additionally, there are tools (xcalib, dispwin) which can do finer
> adjustments to the video card LUT then just the simple xgamma. However,
> one needs to use a calibration device.
>
> What you finally see on your screen is a result of monitor's native
> gamma and any gamma adjustments to video card LUT. (Monitor gamma
> divided by LUT gamma.)
>
>> I'm a bit puzzled by this: what is the nominal gamma of my monitor (a
>> Samsung SyncMaster, so a very common one)? If it is 2.2 why shall I
>> set it to 1.0?
>
> The various tools for gamma adjustments do not tell you what is the
> visual gamma, but only what gamma adjustment is done to LUT.
>
> regards,
>
> Milan Knizek
> knizek (dot) confy (at) volny (dot) cz
> http://www.milan-knizek.net - About linux and photography (Czech
> language only)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users