Fwd: [exiv2] Exiv2 release 0.12

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Fwd: [exiv2] Exiv2 release 0.12

Gilles Caulier-2
Hi all digiKam and kipi-plugins users,

Like you can see, a new Exiv2 library release have been published today. I
recommend to use Exiv2 0.12 version with current implementation of digiKam
and kipi-plugins to handle properly pictures meta-data.

Regards

Gilles Caulier

----------  Message transmis  ----------

Subject: [exiv2] Exiv2 release 0.12
Date: Lundi 27 Novembre 2006 15:11
From: "Andreas Huggel" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]

This is a maintenance release with bugfixes and just a few new features.

* The exiv2 tool can now use the original filename when renaming images
* The library has pretty-print functions for Exif GPS tags

Changelog: http://www.exiv2.org/changelog.html
Download : http://www.exiv2.org/download.html

Thanks to all who contributed!

Have fun!
Andreas


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/exiv2/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/exiv2/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[hidden email]
    mailto:[hidden email]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [hidden email]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/info/terms.html

-------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fwd: [exiv2] Exiv2 release 0.12

Colin Guthrie-6
Caulier Gilles wrote:
> Like you can see, a new Exiv2 library release have been published today. I
> recommend to use Exiv2 0.12 version with current implementation of digiKam
> and kipi-plugins to handle properly pictures meta-data.

Judging by the number of problems and bug reports against the previous
version, is it worth adjusting the autoconf stuff (in dk and kp) to
*require* v0.12?

Col.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users