-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] Multiple, overlapping tag types? Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:05:36 -0400 From: David kerber <[hidden email]> To: Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]> On 8/12/2010 10:46 AM, Johannes Wienke wrote: > David Kerber wrote: >> I'm trying to find a low cost picture organizer that will meet my needs, >> and am coming up empty, but it looks like digikam is close. Can >> somebody tell me if I'm missing something in the docs? >> >> What I need is to be able to put a picture in multiple disjoint groups. >> For example, I might have a group called "flowers" and a group called >> "bugs". A closeup of a bug on a flower would be entered into both >> groups. Then I need to be able to search for "flowers", or "bugs", and >> this picture would show up both searches. If I were to search on >> "'flowers' AND 'bugs'", this might be the only picture that shows up. >> >> Can digikam do this right now? > > Yes, absolutely possible with tags. > > Johannes > Ok, the install went smoothly, and I'm playing with it now. In the search box, under Advanced Search, Tags section, how do it tell it that the tags should be AND'd together, rather than OR'd? In mathematical terms, I want the intersection rather than the union of the tags' search results. D _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Am 12.08.2010 19:16 schrieb David Kerber:
> > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] Multiple, overlapping tag types? > Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:05:36 -0400 > From: David kerber <[hidden email]> > To: Johannes Wienke <[hidden email]> > > On 8/12/2010 10:46 AM, Johannes Wienke wrote: >> David Kerber wrote: >>> I'm trying to find a low cost picture organizer that will meet my needs, >>> and am coming up empty, but it looks like digikam is close. Can >>> somebody tell me if I'm missing something in the docs? >>> >>> What I need is to be able to put a picture in multiple disjoint groups. >>> For example, I might have a group called "flowers" and a group called >>> "bugs". A closeup of a bug on a flower would be entered into both >>> groups. Then I need to be able to search for "flowers", or "bugs", and >>> this picture would show up both searches. If I were to search on >>> "'flowers' AND 'bugs'", this might be the only picture that shows up. >>> >>> Can digikam do this right now? >> >> Yes, absolutely possible with tags. >> >> Johannes >> > > Ok, the install went smoothly, and I'm playing with it now. > > In the search box, under Advanced Search, Tags section, how do it tell > it that the tags should be AND'd together, rather than OR'd? In > mathematical terms, I want the intersection rather than the union of the > tags' search results. one of the tags on the left side and then use the tag filter sidebar on the right side to further restrict the images with more tags. This allows a conjunction. Johannes _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users signature.asc (270 bytes) Download Attachment |
On 8/12/2010 2:29 PM, Johannes Wienke wrote:
> Am 12.08.2010 19:16 schrieb David Kerber: >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [Digikam-users] Multiple, overlapping tag types? >> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:05:36 -0400 >> From: David kerber<[hidden email]> >> To: Johannes Wienke<[hidden email]> >> >> On 8/12/2010 10:46 AM, Johannes Wienke wrote: >>> David Kerber wrote: >>>> I'm trying to find a low cost picture organizer that will meet my needs, >>>> and am coming up empty, but it looks like digikam is close. Can >>>> somebody tell me if I'm missing something in the docs? >>>> >>>> What I need is to be able to put a picture in multiple disjoint groups. >>>> For example, I might have a group called "flowers" and a group called >>>> "bugs". A closeup of a bug on a flower would be entered into both >>>> groups. Then I need to be able to search for "flowers", or "bugs", and >>>> this picture would show up both searches. If I were to search on >>>> "'flowers' AND 'bugs'", this might be the only picture that shows up. >>>> >>>> Can digikam do this right now? >>> >>> Yes, absolutely possible with tags. >>> >>> Johannes >>> >> >> Ok, the install went smoothly, and I'm playing with it now. >> >> In the search box, under Advanced Search, Tags section, how do it tell >> it that the tags should be AND'd together, rather than OR'd? In >> mathematical terms, I want the intersection rather than the union of the >> tags' search results. > > Hm, with searches I really can't find this but what you can do is select > one of the tags on the left side and then use the tag filter sidebar on > the right side to further restrict the images with more tags. This > allows a conjunction. > That seems to work. Not quite as convenient or intuitive as doing it in the search box, but usable. Probably worth an enhancement request, though. Danke, Johannes! D _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
On 8/12/2010 8:17 PM, jim junk wrote:
> Click on SEARCHES>ADVANCED SEARCHES > You should get a really great search box. Look at the bottom of the box > for +ADD SEARCH GROUP > That creates a second search linked by OR. Click on the OR to change it > to AND Now that's what I'm talking about! I had seen the multiple searches thing, but didn't realize I could change the OR to an AND. It would still be nice to be able to just AND the tag list in a single search list, but this works great. > You can save the search. I already saw that. I'm really liking digiKam already; I hope the windows port keeps up with the Linux development pace. Thanks! D _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |