Followup from previous mail

[Amilcar Lucas]

Hi,

Am I correct to assume that I will need to edit line
digikam/database/scancontroller.cpp:515 like this:

- if  (!d->scanTasks.contains(path))
+ if  (!d->scanTasks.contains(path) && !path.contains("@eadir"))

To fix the bug ?

Regards,
Amilcar Lucas


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Teemu Rytilahti]

Amilcar Lucas wrote:

> Hi,

Hi,

> Am I correct to assume that I will need to edit line
> digikam/database/scancontroller.cpp:515 like this:
>
> - if  (!d->scanTasks.contains(path))
> + if  (!d->scanTasks.contains(path) && !path.contains("@eadir"))
>
> To fix the bug ?

I'm not sure if someone answered to you already, but here's my take. This
change would just make them not to be listed at all if the path would
contain that, right?

In my opinion the correct way to handle would be to add a special tag to be
set to images (and folders) to hide, and use normal filtering solutions
inside the filter models.

--
Best Regards,
Teemu Rytilahti


_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Amilcar Lucas]

Hi,

Thanks for the reply.

I think the best solution is to avoid the scanning at all because each eadir contains a subdirectory for each picture in the album (that is a lot of subdirectories) and each one contains four versions (thumbnails at different resolutions) of the original file.

Those are a lot of files that do not need metadata paring because they are redundant anyway.

Regards,

Amilcar

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel