Exif Inromation
Locked
 
|
Hi *.
Is it possible to display more exif information within digikam? As far as I know, Exiftool contains many more information about the picture than exif2. Thanks! |
|
|
Ask to Exiv2 project. Improvements of metadata parsers must be done in
this library Gilles Caulier 2009/9/13 mrwoody <[hidden email]>: > > Hi *. > Is it possible to display more exif information within digikam? > As far as I know, Exiftool contains many more information about the picture > than exif2. > > Thanks! > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Exif-Inromation-tp25421482p25421482.html > Sent from the digikam-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Well if exiv2 sucks, maybe digikam should find an alternative, such as
exiftool. At least this is my opinion.
Gilles Caulier wrote: Ask to Exiv2 project. Improvements of metadata parsers must be done in this library Gilles Caulier 2009/9/13 mrwoody [hidden email]:Hi *. Is it possible to display more exif information within digikam? As far as I know, Exiftool contains many more information about the picture than exif2. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Exif-Inromation-tp25421482p25421482.html Sent from the digikam-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Non, non, and no. Exiftool is perl, Exiv2 is C++. digiKAm is C+++, and
Exiv2 support a lots for images formats. Help to improve Exiv2 instead to try to increase puzzle complexity... Gilles Caulier 2009/9/13 Mister Woody <[hidden email]>: > Well if exiv2 sucks, maybe digikam should find an alternative, such as > exiftool. At least this is my opinion. > > > Gilles Caulier wrote: > > Ask to Exiv2 project. Improvements of metadata parsers must be done in > this library > > Gilles Caulier > > 2009/9/13 mrwoody <[hidden email]>: > > > Hi *. > Is it possible to display more exif information within digikam? > As far as I know, Exiftool contains many more information about the picture > than exif2. > > Thanks! > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Exif-Inromation-tp25421482p25421482.html > Sent from the digikam-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: Exif Inromation
|
|
In reply to this post by mrwoody
Maybe you just need to display the full list?
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/7955/exiflist.png Might be a help... On Sunday 13 September 2009 10:36:16 mrwoody wrote: > Hi *. > Is it possible to display more exif information within digikam? > As far as I know, Exiftool contains many more information about the picture > than exif2. > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Re: Exif Inromation
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
Wow, we are even C++++ ? Yeah! :D
We simply rock! This is why I can't compile digiKam with gcc anymore :-) Andi On Sunday 13 September 2009 11:15:48 Gilles Caulier wrote: > Non, non, and no. Exiftool is perl, Exiv2 is C++. digiKAm is C+++, and > Exiv2 support a lots for images formats. Help to improve Exiv2 instead > to try to increase puzzle complexity... > > Gilles Caulier > > 2009/9/13 Mister Woody <[hidden email]>: > > Well if exiv2 sucks, maybe digikam should find an alternative, such as > > exiftool. At least this is my opinion. > > > > > > Gilles Caulier wrote: > > > > Ask to Exiv2 project. Improvements of metadata parsers must be done in > > this library > > > > Gilles Caulier > > > > 2009/9/13 mrwoody <[hidden email]>: > > > > > > Hi *. > > Is it possible to display more exif information within digikam? > > As far as I know, Exiftool contains many more information about the > > picture than exif2. > > > > Thanks! > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://www.nabble.com/Exif-Inromation-tp25421482p25421482.html > > Sent from the digikam-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Digikam-users mailing list > > [hidden email] > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Digikam-users mailing list > > [hidden email] > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Digikam-users mailing list > > [hidden email] > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by mrwoody
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Mister Woody wrote:
> Well if exiv2 sucks, As this if-clause is not fullfilled... > maybe digikam should find an alternative, ... there is no need for this consequence. > such as > exiftool. At least this is my opinion. If you have concrete improvements in mind, politely ask the exiv2 project, see http://dev.exiv2.org/wiki/exiv2 for further details. Best, Arnd > Gilles Caulier wrote: > > Ask to Exiv2 project. Improvements of metadata parsers must be done in > > this library > > > > Gilles Caulier > > > > 2009/9/13 mrwoody <[hidden email]>: > > > >> Hi *. > >> Is it possible to display more exif information within digikam? > >> As far as I know, Exiftool contains many more information about the picture > >> than exif2. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> -- > >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Exif-Inromation-tp25421482p25421482.html > >> Sent from the digikam-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Digikam-users mailing list > >> [hidden email] > >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Digikam-users mailing list > > [hidden email] > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
Sorry for the naive question, but where do you get the menu as in your screenshot?
I don't see it here.
|
|
|
In reply to this post by mrwoody
Sorry everyone if I insist on this. But, if I look at
exiv2 -pt filename it does show all the info I am interested in. So why can't I see these on digikam? also it would be nice if it was possible to select which data I am interested in... meaning that within the simple and the full list, there should be a personalized list. Thanks! |
Re: Exif Inromation
|
|
mrwoody wrote:
> Sorry everyone if I insist on this. But, if I look at > exiv2 -pt filename > it does show all the info I am interested in. Which information are you interested in, that exiv2 does not show? Could you post some examples? Michael _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Thanks for your reply.
There are few. E.g. Flash settings does not show in digikam (but it does show in exiv2) from exiv -pt: Exif.Nikon3.FlashSetting Ascii 13 SLOW Michael G. Hansen wrote: mrwoody wrote: _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
AH ah ah...
Flash seetings is Nikon Makernote ! Its not standard Exif data ! Go to makernote tab and all will be fine... Gilles Caulier 2009/9/15 Mister Woody <[hidden email]>: > Thanks for your reply. > There are few. E.g. Flash settings does not show in digikam (but it does > show in exiv2) > > from exiv -pt: > Exif.Nikon3.FlashSetting Ascii 13 SLOW > > > > > Michael G. Hansen wrote: > > mrwoody wrote: > > > Sorry everyone if I insist on this. But, if I look at > exiv2 -pt filename > it does show all the info I am interested in. > > > Which information are you interested in, that exiv2 does not show? Could > you post some examples? > > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Before to ask that Exiv2 is dummy, Check indeep :
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3508/3921742925_2bab99bf53_o.png Gilles Caulier 2009/9/15 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: > AH ah ah... > > Flash seetings is Nikon Makernote ! Its not standard Exif data ! Go to > makernote tab and all will be fine... > > Gilles Caulier > > 2009/9/15 Mister Woody <[hidden email]>: >> Thanks for your reply. >> There are few. E.g. Flash settings does not show in digikam (but it does >> show in exiv2) >> >> from exiv -pt: >> Exif.Nikon3.FlashSetting Ascii 13 SLOW >> >> >> >> >> Michael G. Hansen wrote: >> >> mrwoody wrote: >> >> >> Sorry everyone if I insist on this. But, if I look at >> exiv2 -pt filename >> it does show all the info I am interested in. >> >> >> Which information are you interested in, that exiv2 does not show? Could >> you post some examples? >> >> Michael >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Gilles Caulier-4
You are right.. I apologize for my naive question, once again.
On the other hand, it would be nice to see an option to configure which info to display. Thanks for your help!
|
|
|
> On the other hand, it would be nice to see an option to configure which info
> to display. Done in current implementation. You can customize all metadata view.. Gilles Caulier > > Thanks for your help! > > > Bugzilla from [hidden email] wrote: >> >> AH ah ah... >> >> Flash seetings is Nikon Makernote ! Its not standard Exif data ! Go to >> makernote tab and all will be fine... >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> 2009/9/15 Mister Woody <[hidden email]>: >>> Thanks for your reply. >>> There are few. E.g. Flash settings does not show in digikam (but it does >>> show in exiv2) >>> >>> from exiv -pt: >>> Exif.Nikon3.FlashSetting Ascii 13 SLOW >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Michael G. Hansen wrote: >>> >>> mrwoody wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sorry everyone if I insist on this. But, if I look at >>> exiv2 -pt filename >>> it does show all the info I am interested in. >>> >>> >>> Which information are you interested in, that exiv2 does not show? Could >>> you post some examples? >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Exif-Inromation-tp25421482p25460402.html > Sent from the digikam-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
«
Return to digikam-users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |