CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
Hi David,
What do you mean exactly? Everytime when digikam releases an updated version, in less then no time Philip Johnsson has it is his PPA. The newly released doc descibes it and guides you to there. No one has to strewn with 'makes' and 'configures', but for some reason it is exitement for some people, as others prefer to bungy jump. Regards, Rinus Op 27-08-11 21:25, David Vincent-Jones schreef: > For some time I have been fervently preaching the wonders of Digikam to > photographers as a means of garnering their interest in 'putting a toe' > into the waters of Linux. > > Converts we will not get when the path is strewn with 'makes' and > 'configures'. > > I find it simply sad that a current and stable Digikam version is not > readily available in the repositories. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
2011/8/27 sleepless <[hidden email]> Hi David, And it's available in the Fedora kde-unstable repository too ... but I'm one of the few victims of the libdc1394 problem, that's why Gilles suggested I tried the last gist version. In fact, the main reason I switched from Ubuntu to Fedora was that Digikam's new versions are available very soon after they're released ... even if they are available in a so-called "unstable" official repository. Marie-Noëlle -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Rinus
On Saturday 27 Aug 2011 21:23:00 sleepless wrote: > Hi David, > > What do you mean exactly? > > Everytime when digikam releases an updated version, in less then no time > Philip Johnsson has it is his PPA. > The newly released doc descibes it and guides you to there.
Unfortunately there are no builds for 11.10 yet and it doesn't look likely at the moment that the official repos will have anything newer than 1.9.
> No one has to strewn with 'makes' and 'configures', but for some reason it > is exitement for some people, as others prefer to bungy jump.
Now that I have successfully built digiKam, would someone like to give me some help in uploading it to my own PPA space?
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Op 28-08-11 10:08, Mark Fraser schreef:
I would appeciate that. Making digikam available for as many people as possible in the most easy way possible. But I think it is a realy complex matter, far more complex than uploading a deb file of your own build I suppose. I am very eager to learn more on the subject, not to start my own ppa but just curious! Hope you will have lot of usefull respons. Regards, Rinus
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Mark Fraser
Le 28/08/2011 10:08, Mark Fraser a écrit :
> Now that I have successfully built digiKam, would someone like to give > me some help in uploading it to my own PPA space? checkinstall should allow you to build rpm/debs... from your compilation folder jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://www.youtube.com/user/jdddodinorg http://jdd.blip.tv/ _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Mark Fraser
11.10 is still in testing phase, so don't expect to have software update
instantly here. It happens that very old version was still present in aplha.3 or beta.1, and they are only updated few weeks before the final release (for example I already notice this for fglrx package). If you use a testing distrib, you have to assume it's not finalized... ;>) Le Sun, 28 Aug 2011 10:08:30 +0200, Mark Fraser <[hidden email]> a écrit: > On Saturday 27 Aug 2011 21:23:00 sleepless wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> What do you mean exactly? >> >> Everytime when digikam releases an updated version, in less then no time >> Philip Johnsson has it is his PPA. >> The newly released doc descibes it and guides you to there. > > Unfortunately there are no builds for 11.10 yet and it doesn't look > likely at > the moment that the official repos will have anything newer than 1.9. > >> No one has to strewn with 'makes' and 'configures', but for some reason >> it >> is exitement for some people, as others prefer to bungy jump. > > Now that I have successfully built digiKam, would someone like to give > me some > help in uploading it to my own PPA space? -- -- Nicolas Boulesteix Photographe chasseur de lueurs http://www.photonoxx.fr _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by davidvj
Am Samstag, 27. August 2011, 12:25:23 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> For some time I have been fervently preaching the wonders of Digikam to > photographers as a means of garnering their interest in 'putting a toe' > into the waters of Linux. > > Converts we will not get when the path is strewn with 'makes' and > 'configures'. > > I find it simply sad that a current and stable Digikam version is not > readily available in the repositories. Then you have to blame/complain to your distro since distros package digikam. As you can read in this thread there are packages for openSUSE, fedora, *buntu and probably others, so most linux users do have access to those packages. Sven _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by jdd@dodin.org
On Sunday 28 Aug 2011 10:48:17 jdd wrote: > Le 28/08/2011 10:08, Mark Fraser a écrit : > > Now that I have successfully built digiKam, would someone like to give > > me some help in uploading it to my own PPA space? > > checkinstall should allow you to build rpm/debs... from your > compilation folder
I've used checkinstall, but I want to build it so that it can be uploaded to my PPA.
_______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
It's not trivial to make packages so you can upload them to Launchpad.
You need to make all the Debian package and build scripts. About all you need to know are to be find on this Ubuntu page but there are guides that can get you started somewhere but usually you step in to deeper water so to speak rather soon and get more or less complicated... https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete /Philip On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Mark Fraser <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I've used checkinstall, but I want to build it so that it can be uploaded to > my PPA. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |