Gilles,
I did it already and, since the output was not useful, you asked me to run Digikam through gdb... Regards, Alberto > Instead GDB, it's better to run digiKam through valgrind to see memory > leak, like it's explained here : > > https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/repository/revisions/master/entry/HACKING#L281 > > Gilles Caulier -- Home page: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto Photo galleries : http://albertoferrante.name Public key: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto/keys/yahoo.asc _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Oups sorry. right...
The gdb output is not really clear... Gilles 2011/12/3 Alberto Ferrante <[hidden email]>: > Gilles, > I did it already and, since the output was not useful, you asked me to > run Digikam through gdb... > > Regards, > Alberto > >> Instead GDB, it's better to run digiKam through valgrind to see memory >> leak, like it's explained here : >> >> https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/graphics/digikam/repository/revisions/master/entry/HACKING#L281 >> >> Gilles Caulier > > > -- > Home page: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto > Photo galleries : http://albertoferrante.name > Public key: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto/keys/yahoo.asc > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Alberto Ferrante
So, unless you have any other suggestion, it looks like there is no way
for me to debug this problem without looking at the code by myself (which is something I do not wish to do at the moment). I will probably go back to Picasa :-( Regards, Alberto > Oups sorry. right... > > The gdb output is not really clear... > > Gilles -- Home page: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto Photo galleries : http://albertoferrante.name Public key: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto/keys/yahoo.asc _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
The really strange thing, is that i cannot reproduce the problem here.
There is no memory leak. Sound like a dysfunction on your system... Gilles Caulier 2011/12/5 Alberto Ferrante <[hidden email]>: > So, unless you have any other suggestion, it looks like there is no way > for me to debug this problem without looking at the code by myself > (which is something I do not wish to do at the moment). > > I will probably go back to Picasa :-( > > Regards, > Alberto > >> Oups sorry. right... >> >> The gdb output is not really clear... >> >> Gilles > > > -- > Home page: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto > Photo galleries : http://albertoferrante.name > Public key: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto/keys/yahoo.asc > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
I have the same type of problem. As soon as I start digikam my system become
very slow and as soon as I close Digikam my system return to normal speed. I'm on Fedora 14, AMD Phenom(tm) 9850 Quad-Core Processor, 8 gig ram, nEVGA Geforce 9800GT I should have enough power but the graphic is slow to refresh. everything is slow to show up on the screen. what can I do to find out what is the problem. I'm typing faster with only two finger then what the computer can write on the screen. I have the time to write a complete sentence and then watch it appearing on the screen one letter at a time... -- Claude Gélinas agr. Phyto Ressources inc. _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Alberto Ferrante
Good news here: a couple of days ago Digikam was updated to the 2.4
release in Fedora and the problem with memory usage disappeared... I could even add a folder with more than 100'000 photos without any problem (maximum memory usage of 6-7GB). Best regards, Alberto On 12/05/2011 05:40 PM, Alberto Ferrante wrote: > So, unless you have any other suggestion, it looks like there is no way > for me to debug this problem without looking at the code by myself > (which is something I do not wish to do at the moment). > > I will probably go back to Picasa :-( -- Home page: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto Photo galleries : http://albertoferrante.name Public key: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto/keys/yahoo.asc _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
With 2.5.0, Andi Clements has fix other memory consumption. He has
also identified some huge memory allocation with color management, and he work on it to optimize this part... Gilles Caulier 2011/12/23 Alberto Ferrante <[hidden email]>: > Good news here: a couple of days ago Digikam was updated to the 2.4 > release in Fedora and the problem with memory usage disappeared... I > could even add a folder with more than 100'000 photos without any > problem (maximum memory usage of 6-7GB). > > Best regards, > Alberto > > > On 12/05/2011 05:40 PM, Alberto Ferrante wrote: >> So, unless you have any other suggestion, it looks like there is no way >> for me to debug this problem without looking at the code by myself >> (which is something I do not wish to do at the moment). >> >> I will probably go back to Picasa :-( > > > -- > Home page: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto > Photo galleries : http://albertoferrante.name > Public key: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto/keys/yahoo.asc > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Alberto Ferrante
Had the same experience here with my update! It's sooooo nice to be able to start the program and get working instead of walking away while the program loads the photos. great improvement in Digikam. Thanks. What a nice Christmas present.
For reference, Im using fedora 16 Jen On Dec 23, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Alberto Ferrante <[hidden email]> wrote: > Good news here: a couple of days ago Digikam was updated to the 2.4 > release in Fedora and the problem with memory usage disappeared... I > could even add a folder with more than 100'000 photos without any > problem (maximum memory usage of 6-7GB). > > Best regards, > Alberto > > > On 12/05/2011 05:40 PM, Alberto Ferrante wrote: >> So, unless you have any other suggestion, it looks like there is no way >> for me to debug this problem without looking at the code by myself >> (which is something I do not wish to do at the moment). >> >> I will probably go back to Picasa :-( > > > -- > Home page: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto > Photo galleries : http://albertoferrante.name > Public key: http://www.alari.ch/people/alberto/keys/yahoo.asc > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |