Hi,
I have do to some work on a series of RAW /CR2) photos and I start to do it with digikam 0.9 svn and compare it with ufraw. When comparing the results between ufraw and digikam I get better results with ufraw - less noise and a _far_ better visual start with correct brightness. This not very exiting when you open a RAW file and have nearly a black screen in digikam. As we know somehow the dynamic range of raw files it should be better to use a auto dynamic stretcher per default. By now I still have not found a workflow to get the same qualitiy like the embedded JPEG with digiKam If have also ask Dave Coffin about denoising with dcraw: > > what is the benefit when using the bilinear denoiser on dcraw level? > > Could I get better/same results with an advanced denoiser on application > > level > > Dcraw applies bilateral filtering before Fuji > rotation and colorspace conversion. Applying this > filter to the final dcraw output might give slightly > different results. > > > Does -B work on every quality level (-q 0,1,3)? > > You could use "-B" with lower quality settings, > but that would be like buying the cheapest lubricating > oil for your $100,000 Mercedes. If AHD interpolation > is too slow, forget about bilateral filtering. > > > When using the verbose output I get the information e.g. > > Daylight multipliers: 2.098645 0.930145 1.180146 > > Camera multipliers: 2173.000000 1015.000000 1665.000000 > > What does this mean? > > Multiplying red, green, and blue by these numbers > should give color neutrality. That is, a grey or white > card in the photo should have R=G=B after multiplication. > > The "Daylight" values are set within dcraw.c based > on test images shot under D65 or sunlight. The "Camera" > values are set in the camera when the user selects an > illuminant. "dcraw" uses the first; "dcraw -w" uses the > second. > > The difference between 0.930145 and 1015.000000 is > irrelevant -- only the red/green/blue ratios matter. > > Dave Coffin 4/28/2006 Bye Thorsten _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Hello,
Thorsten Schnebeck wrote: > Hi, > > I have do to some work on a series of RAW /CR2) photos and I start to do it > with digikam 0.9 svn and compare it with ufraw. > > When comparing the results between ufraw and digikam I get > better results with ufraw - less noise and a _far_ better visual start with > correct brightness. This not very exiting when you open a RAW file and have > nearly a black screen in digikam. > > The images get better, when gamma is increased towards 1.0. So I believe, that images are imported without gamma correction. Currently colormanagement doesnt work for me. (I didnt much effort to try it out) When colormanagement works, then the color-problem should be solved. Assign a linear colorspace to the image and colors should look ok. (that means: set a linear input colorspace). Peter _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |