Hi list,
with the kind support of the digikam team I managed to prepare a RC1 tarball for digikamimageplugins-0.8.1. This tarball is for INTERNAL TESTING by the digikam devs (and people who want to help) only. Also we do not expect any problems with this tarball it MIGHT NOT be the final release - it's a RELEASE CANDIDATE! To make things a little easier and straight forward I already labeled it as it would be the final tarball (so wish me luck!). If we encounter any problems we will fix it and I will prepare a tarball with RC2 in its name. Testers please download the tarball here: http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/sroeder/digikamimageplugins-0.8.1.tar.bz2 and report any success or failure on install. It builds fine here on Gentoo with GCC 3.4.4. Note: There will be NO digikamimageplugins-docs-0.8.1 (docs were not updated between 0.8 and 0.8.1). We hope that the final release can be done at the weekend - please wait until the weekend if you do not explicitly want to help the devel team testing whether the tarball builds fine on every box. Good night (and best wishes to Gilles to recover your health) Sero _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Le Jeudi 9 Février 2006 00:59, Sebastian Röder a écrit :
> Hi list, > > with the kind support of the digikam team I managed to prepare a RC1 > tarball for digikamimageplugins-0.8.1. This tarball is for INTERNAL TESTING > by the digikam devs (and people who want to help) only. > > Also we do not expect any problems with this tarball it MIGHT NOT be the > final release - it's a RELEASE CANDIDATE! > > To make things a little easier and straight forward I already labeled it as > it would be the final tarball (so wish me luck!). If we encounter any > problems we will fix it and I will prepare a tarball with RC2 in its name. > No need to have RC2. I think you can do a final release directly... > Testers please download the tarball here: > http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/sroeder/digikamimageplugins-0.8.1.tar.bz2 > > and report any success or failure on install. It builds fine here on Gentoo > with GCC 3.4.4. > No problem here to compile it under mandriva 2006 official. Good job... > Note: There will be NO digikamimageplugins-docs-0.8.1 (docs were not > updated between 0.8 and 0.8.1). > > We hope that the final release can be done at the weekend - please wait > until the weekend if you do not explicitly want to help the devel team > testing whether the tarball builds fine on every box. > > Good night (and best wishes to Gilles to recover your health) I'm better now (:=)))). I need to get any drugs against... Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Sebastian Roeder
Op donderdag 9 februari 2006 00:59, schreef Sebastian Röder:
> Testers please download the tarball here: > http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/sroeder/digikamimageplugins-0.8.1.tar.bz2 > > and report any success or failure on install. It builds fine here on Gentoo > with GCC 3.4.4. The --enable-final option is broken. Making all in cimgiface make[4]: Entering directory `/home/toma/farm/digikamimageplugins-0.8.1/digikamimageplugins/common/cimgiface' if /bin/sh ../../../libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../../digikamimageplugins/common/include -I../../../digikam/digikam -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I. -I/opt/kde/include -Dcimg_OS=-1 -Dcimg_display_type=0 -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -g3 -fno-inline -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -fexceptions -MT cimgiface.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/cimgiface.Tpo" -c -o cimgiface.lo cimgiface.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/cimgiface.Tpo" ".deps/cimgiface.Plo"; else rm -f ".deps/cimgiface.Tpo"; exit 1; fi In file included from /opt/kde/include/digikam/imageiface.h:40, from ../../../digikamimageplugins/common/include/digikamheaders.h:52, from cimgiface.h:27, from cimgiface.cpp:49: /opt/kde/include/digikam/dimg.h:38:32: error: dimgloaderobserver.h: No such file or directory /opt/kde/include/digikam/dimg.h:98: error: 'DImgLoaderObserver' has not been declared /opt/kde/include/digikam/dimg.h:109: error: 'DImgLoaderObserver' has not been declared /opt/kde/include/digikam/dimg.h:112: error: 'DImgLoaderObserver' has not been declared CImg.h: In constructor 'cimg_library::CImgException::CImgException(const char*, ...)': CImg.h:623: warning: function might be possible candidate for 'printf' format attribute CImg.h: In constructor 'cimg_library::CImgInstanceException::CImgInstanceException(const char*, ...)': [...] Toma _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel attachment0 (196 bytes) Download Attachment |
Op zondag 12 februari 2006 13:08, schreef Tom Albers:
> Op donderdag 9 februari 2006 00:59, schreef Sebastian Röder: > > Testers please download the tarball here: > > http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/sroeder/digikamimageplugins-0.8.1.tar.bz > >2 > > > > and report any success or failure on install. It builds fine here on > > Gentoo with GCC 3.4.4. > > The --enable-final option is broken. Actually, it does not build without the option either. It does not build for me at all. Am I the only one? Tom > Making all in cimgiface > make[4]: Entering directory > `/home/toma/farm/digikamimageplugins-0.8.1/digikamimageplugins/common/cimgi >face' if /bin/sh ../../../libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. > -I../../../digikamimageplugins/common/include -I../../../digikam/digikam > -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I. -I/opt/kde/include > -Dcimg_OS=-1 -Dcimg_display_type=0 -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT > -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align > -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -g3 -fno-inline > -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wno-non-virtual-dtor > -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE > -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION > -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT > -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -fexceptions -MT cimgiface.lo -MD -MP -MF > ".deps/cimgiface.Tpo" -c -o cimgiface.lo cimgiface.cpp; \ > then mv -f ".deps/cimgiface.Tpo" ".deps/cimgiface.Plo"; else rm -f > ".deps/cimgiface.Tpo"; exit 1; fi > In file included from /opt/kde/include/digikam/imageiface.h:40, > > from ../../../digikamimageplugins/common/include/digikamheaders.h:52, > from cimgiface.h:27, > from cimgiface.cpp:49: > /opt/kde/include/digikam/dimg.h:38:32: error: dimgloaderobserver.h: No such > file or directory > /opt/kde/include/digikam/dimg.h:98: error: 'DImgLoaderObserver' has not > been declared > /opt/kde/include/digikam/dimg.h:109: error: 'DImgLoaderObserver' has not > been declared > /opt/kde/include/digikam/dimg.h:112: error: 'DImgLoaderObserver' has not > been declared > CImg.h: In constructor 'cimg_library::CImgException::CImgException(const > char*, ...)': > CImg.h:623: warning: function might be possible candidate for 'printf' > format attribute > CImg.h: In constructor > 'cimg_library::CImgInstanceException::CImgInstanceException(const > char*, ...)': > [...] > > Toma _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel attachment0 (196 bytes) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from tomalbers@kde.nl
Le Dimanche 12 Février 2006 13:08, Tom Albers a écrit :
> Op donderdag 9 februari 2006 00:59, schreef Sebastian Röder: > > Testers please download the tarball here: > > http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/sroeder/digikamimageplugins-0.8.1.tar.bz > >2 > > > > and report any success or failure on install. It builds fine here on > > Gentoo with GCC 3.4.4. > > The --enable-final option is broken. You have mixed trunk and stable branch source code during compilation. DigikamImagePlugins have detected digikam header on your system, but these headers come from 0.9.0-alpha... Gilles > > Making all in cimgiface > make[4]: Entering directory > `/home/toma/farm/digikamimageplugins-0.8.1/digikamimageplugins/common/cimgi >face' if /bin/sh ../../../libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. > -I../../../digikamimageplugins/common/include -I../../../digikam/digikam > -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I. -I/opt/kde/include > -Dcimg_OS=-1 -Dcimg_display_type=0 -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT > -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align > -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -g3 -fno-inline > -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wno-non-virtual-dtor > -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE > -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION > -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT > -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -fexceptions -MT cimgiface.lo -MD -MP -MF > ".deps/cimgiface.Tpo" -c -o cimgiface.lo cimgiface.cpp; \ > then mv -f ".deps/cimgiface.Tpo" ".deps/cimgiface.Plo"; else rm -f > ".deps/cimgiface.Tpo"; exit 1; fi > In file included from /opt/kde/include/digikam/imageiface.h:40, > > from ../../../digikamimageplugins/common/include/digikamheaders.h:52, > from cimgiface.h:27, > from cimgiface.cpp:49: > /opt/kde/include/digikam/dimg.h:38:32: error: dimgloaderobserver.h: No such > file or directory > /opt/kde/include/digikam/dimg.h:98: error: 'DImgLoaderObserver' has not > been declared > /opt/kde/include/digikam/dimg.h:109: error: 'DImgLoaderObserver' has not > been declared > /opt/kde/include/digikam/dimg.h:112: error: 'DImgLoaderObserver' has not > been declared > CImg.h: In constructor 'cimg_library::CImgException::CImgException(const > char*, ...)': > CImg.h:623: warning: function might be possible candidate for 'printf' > format attribute > CImg.h: In constructor > 'cimg_library::CImgInstanceException::CImgInstanceException(const > char*, ...)': > [...] > > Toma Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Gilles Caulier schreef:
> Le Dimanche 12 Février 2006 13:08, Tom Albers a écrit : > >>Op donderdag 9 februari 2006 00:59, schreef Sebastian Röder: >> >>>Testers please download the tarball here: >>>http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/sroeder/digikamimageplugins-0.8.1.tar.bz >>>2 >>> >>>and report any success or failure on install. It builds fine here on >>>Gentoo with GCC 3.4.4. >> >>The --enable-final option is broken. > > > You have mixed trunk and stable branch source code during compilation. > DigikamImagePlugins have detected digikam header on your system, but these > headers come from 0.9.0-alpha... > That is possible. Toma _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Le Lundi 13 Février 2006 17:38, Tom Albers a écrit :
> Gilles Caulier schreef: > > Le Dimanche 12 Février 2006 13:08, Tom Albers a écrit : > >>Op donderdag 9 februari 2006 00:59, schreef Sebastian Röder: > >>>Testers please download the tarball here: > >>>http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/sroeder/digikamimageplugins-0.8.1.tar.b > >>>z 2 > >>> > >>>and report any success or failure on install. It builds fine here on > >>>Gentoo with GCC 3.4.4. > >> > >>The --enable-final option is broken. > > > > You have mixed trunk and stable branch source code during compilation. > > DigikamImagePlugins have detected digikam header on your system, but > > these headers come from 0.9.0-alpha... > > That is possible. It's possible for you like developper, but in normal way, digiKam < 0.9.0 cannot be mix with 0.8.1 release... 0.9.0 is in alpha and have never be released yet... This is have non sence for me to test if we have digiKam 0.9.0 installed instead 0.8.1 Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |