[Digikam-devel] Digikam on the dot...

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Digikam-devel] Digikam on the dot...

Laurent Rathle

If you haven't seen this  :

http://dot.kde.org/1146830533/
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Digikam-devel] Digikam on the dot...

Gilles Caulier-2
Le Vendredi 05 Mai 2006 02:45 PM, Laurent Rathle a écrit :
> If you haven't seen this  :
>
> http://dot.kde.org/1146830533/

yes. I'm waiting comments on this thread.

After 8 month of development on this release, i hope this job will be promoted
in the right way by users (:=)))...

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Digikam-devel] Digikam on the dot...

Guillaume Laurent
Caulier Gilles wrote:
> After 8 month of development on this release, i hope this job will be promoted
> in the right way by users (:=)))...
>  
I wouldn't count on it. Rosegarden 1.0 barely got a mention on the dot,
and 1.2.3 (after a whole year of dev) went completely unnoticed. Every
time we tried to get a story about a RG release there, we were brushed
off with a "the dot is not for app releases" excuse.

--
Guillaume
http://telegraph-road.org

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Digikam-devel] Digikam on the dot...

Laurent Rathle
Le Vendredi 5 Mai 2006 15:43, Guillaume Laurent a écrit :
> I wouldn't count on it. Rosegarden 1.0 barely got a mention on the dot,
> and 1.2.3 (after a whole year of dev) went completely unnoticed. Every
> time we tried to get a story about a RG release there, we were brushed
> off with a "the dot is not for app releases" excuse.

Strange. amaroK would be an exception ? :

http://dot.kde.org/1139952529/
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Digikam-devel] Digikam on the dot...

Gerhard Kulzer
In reply to this post by Laurent Rathle
On Friday 5 May 2006 14:45, Laurent Rathle wrote:
> If you haven't seen this  :
>
> http://dot.kde.org/1146830533/
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

I started to make a list of websites that we should contact for
articles/reviews after 0.9 goes public. I'd be happy if we can enlarge this
list with your help.

Gerhard

http://www.dpreview.com
http://www.computer-darkroom.com/home.htm
http://www.steves-digicams.com
http://www.insflug.org/raw/
http://www.dslr-forum.de/
http://www.dforum.de/
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel