[Digikam-devel] [Bug 139507] New: integrate jpegoptim software during copy transfer (with a plugin ?)

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139507         
           Summary: integrate jpegoptim software during copy transfer (with
                    a plugin ?)
           Product: digikam
           Version: 0.8.2
          Platform: unspecified
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: wishlist
          Priority: NOR
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: digikam-devel kde org
        ReportedBy: gmludo gmail com


Version:           0.8.2 (using KDE 3.5.5, Kubuntu (edgy) 4:3.5.5-0ubuntu3)
Compiler:          Target: i486-linux-gnu
OS:                Linux (i686) release 2.6.17-10-generic

jpegoptim http://linux.maruhn.com/sec/jpegoptim.html is a software to optimize  jpeg files size without lost informations.

It's maybe a good idea to integrate this during copy transfert from camera.

What do you think about this ?

Thanks for your response.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-2]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139507         
caulier.gilles kdemail net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|general                     |Camera GUI
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139507         




------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com  2007-08-22 09:26 -------
To everybody,

Do you want really this option in camera interface like we do with autorotate feature ?

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139507         




------- Additional Comments From gmludo gmail com  2007-08-22 09:40 -------
Yes, I think.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139507         




------- Additional Comments From mikmach wp pl  2007-08-22 17:42 -------
Tested it on JPEGs from my camera. Optimization is fast but brings only
minor gains. Most of size reduction was 3-4% percent with whole range
0-9%.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Michael Skiba]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139507         




------- Additional Comments From michael michael-skiba de  2007-08-29 17:11 -------
I don't need this option especially so I don't vote for it, but an overall range of 0-9% size reduction without lose of quality(?!), would nice, or? (I could imagen a checkbox option on camera import "[] Optimize JPEG pictures"
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139507         




------- Additional Comments From mikmach wp pl  2007-08-29 22:42 -------
Optimization of 9% was only in real minority of images, about 10% of
them. Big majority of size reductions was in 3-4% range.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139507         




------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com  2007-08-30 10:02 -------
Arnd,

Sound like there is no advantage to implement it...

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Arnd Baecker]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139507         




------- Additional Comments From arnd.baecker web de  2007-08-30 10:58 -------
Well, it's an on average an advantage of 4% and a valid wish.
Personally I don't care about 4% as it does not really make a difference.

I would anyway suggest to copy the images plainly from the camera to one hard disk
and then transfer them to a separate disk on which digikam operates
Then, before starting digikam one could just run jpegoptim.

Should this be marked as WONTFIX, or should we wait to see if
this gets some votes over time?
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139507         




------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles gmail com  2007-08-30 11:02 -------
Arnd,

Agree to WONTFIX. There are more tiedous part to implement instead. Sorry GML...

Marcel, your viewpoint ?

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139507         




------- Additional Comments From mikmach wp pl  2007-08-30 14:37 -------
On my part I am for WONTFIX. Just wanted to point this is another
perfect case for service menus...
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139507         




------- Additional Comments From gmludo gmail com  2007-08-30 19:08 -------
Okay, I'm the reporter of this bug, the service menu is enough for me.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139507         
mikmach wp pl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX



------- Additional Comments From mikmach wp pl  2007-08-31 00:44 -------
Joke is: there is no support for service menus at the moment :(
But this is another question. By popular vote I am closing it as WONTFIX...
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel