------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132806 Summary: Inconsistency in writing IPTC data Product: digikam Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: Tags AssignedTo: digikam-devel kde org ReportedBy: heiner heiner-lamprecht net Version: 0.9.0-svn / 2006-08-22 (using KDE KDE 3.5.4) Installed from: SuSE RPMs Compiler: gcc version 4.0.2 64bit OS: Linux I noticed some inconsitencies about the IPTC data added to images when they are changed: Assinging a tag or rating through the "Comments / Tags" tab results in the following list of IPTC records: ------------------------------------------------------------ Complete list: File name: 2006-08-11__08-42-22_0016.JPG (IPTC Records) >>> IIM Application 2 <<< Byline : Heiner Lamprecht BylineTitle : Caption : (c) Heiner Lamprecht Copyright : (c) Heiner Lamprecht. All rights reserved. Credit : Heiner Lamprecht DateCreated : 2006-08-11 Keywords : Leute/Familie/Simon Program : digiKam ProgramVersion : 0.9.0-beta1 Source : http://www.heiner-lamprecht.net/ TimeCreated : 08:42:22+00:00 Urgency : 8 ------------------------------------------------------------ Assining a tag via d&d vfrom the tag filter tab: No IPTC record is written at all. Assinging a rating or tag throught the context menu results in the following list: ------------------------------------------------------------ File name: 2006-08-11__08-48-11_0020.JPG (IPTC Records) >>> IIM Application 2 <<< Program : digiKam ProgramVersion : 0.9.0-beta1 Urgency : 5 ------------------------------------------------------------ (Or keywords instead of urgency) BTW: Why is copyright information saved as caption (see first example)? _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132806 ------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles free fr 2006-08-22 15:15 ------- 1/ IPTC caption == digiKam comments 2/ IPTC Urgency is typically the right way to rate an image. This way is used by others image management software (like Mapivi for example : http://mapivi.sourceforge.net/features.shtml) 3/ IPTC keywords are used to store digiKam tags (please take a care of ASCII limitation of IPTC). 4/ Assign a tag by drag & drop do not change IPTC metadata : it a bug (:=)) Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Heiner Lamprecht
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132806 ------- Additional Comments From heiner heiner-lamprecht net 2006-08-22 15:27 ------- ad1: Okay, your're right. I forgot, that the camera writes the text as the comment. ad2: Okay, too. But why is the urgency set to 8 when only assining a tag? And why are the other records not written, when assining a rating or tag through the context menu? Heiner _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Heiner Lamprecht
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132806 ------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles free fr 2006-08-22 15:48 ------- ad2 : because of IPTC spec : http://www.iptc.org/std/IIM/4.1/specification/IIMV4.1.pdf Look page 27. No rating = 8 in your case. Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Heiner Lamprecht
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132806 ------- Additional Comments From marcel.wiesweg gmx de 2006-08-23 17:09 ------- Take a loop at #127583, comment 5. Is this the same problem/inconsistency? _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Heiner Lamprecht
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132806 ------- Additional Comments From heiner heiner-lamprecht net 2006-08-23 18:48 ------- Looks pretty much like the same problem. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Heiner Lamprecht
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132806 caulier.gilles free fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles free fr 2006-08-24 07:36 ------- ok I mark this file like dupplicate of #127583 Gilles *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 127583 *** _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |