------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128333 Summary: digikam automatic photographic tags Product: digikam Version: unspecified Platform: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: digikam-devel kde org ReportedBy: roger.larsson norran net Version: 0.8.2-rc1 (using KDE 3.4.2 Level "b" , SUSE 10.0) Compiler: Target: i586-suse-linux OS: Linux (i686) release 2.6.13-15.10-default I am trying to take a photo on one specific scene, so I have (soon) hundreds of images looking almost the same... I am trying to set tags and rate them to be able to keep them organized. I have some tags related to the technical quality of the images. * Under/over exposed * Sharp/... I then noticed that initial technical quality taging can be made automatic. From the histogram: peak at max => over exposed. empty at high levels => under exposed. From the image/preview data: only smooth edges => out of focus. - - - _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128333 caulier.gilles free fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|general |Tags _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128333 ------- Additional Comments From arnd.baecker web de 2007-09-11 08:10 ------- About sharpness: this can be problematic if only a small part of the image is sharp (like a macro shot of an insect) or a person before a blurred background. BTW, do you have a specific measure for sharpness in mind (i.e. how do you quantify: "only smooth edges")? There seem to be quite a few posssible ones around. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128333 ------- Additional Comments From roger.larsson norran net 2007-09-12 00:09 ------- I thinking about something like this: 1. Maybe convert to intensity greyscale image... 2a. Run a edge detector on the image 2b. Take absolute value of pixels 3. Make a histogram of the result 4. Compare histograms (top part) 5. Show result as a "analog" meter in tumbnail overview The highest scorer among similar pictures are probably the one with best focus - focus on the wrong part of a picture (like background) might result in erronous higher scores. But those can probably easily be found when viewed as thumbnail. 6. Improve algorithm... (eye/face recognition)... _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from roger.larsson@norran.net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128333 ------- Additional Comments From arnd.baecker web de 2007-09-12 08:11 ------- Roger, I think this is very interesting, and running a search for "detect blur" gives many hits. For example there is a paper "Blur Detection for Digital Images Using Wavelet Transform" which sounds interesting as it will output a single number ("blur extent"). However, I am not sure whether the given examples really correspond to "real world" situations. So, before anything interesting like this is integrated into digikam, some research is needed, in my opinion. We would need a stand-alone implementation for one (better: a bunch) of the methods (including the one you proposed, of course) and see how well they perform on real world images. To test such code, it might be better to prototype it eg. in python. Once could think of using the Python Image Library (http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/) (together with numpy) or VIPS (http://www.vips.ecs.soton.ac.uk/index.php?title=VIPS) which is also scriptable using python. Of course one can do the stuff straight in C++ ... ;-) Do you think you could maybe have a try with that? (For the python/PIL/numpy I could give you some more pointers, if needed). _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |