[Digikam-devel] [Bug 125696] New: digikam does not connect to USB camera with libgphoto-2.1.99

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From benjami bitassa com  2006-10-31 22:02 -------
Debian related bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=396249
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From benjami bitassa com  2006-11-05 19:02 -------
Solved today in Debian Sid:

digiKam Debian changelog:

------------------------------------------
digikam (1:0.9.0~beta3-3) unstable; urgency=low

  [ Mark Purcell ]

[...]

  * Re-Add Build-Depends: libgphoto2-2-dev
    - libgphoto2-2-dev needed (Closes: #396249)

[...]

 -- Debian KDE Extras Team <pkg-kde-extras lists alioth debian org>  Sat,  4 Nov 2006 10:12:50 +0000
------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-2]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles kdemail net  2006-11-06 10:11 -------
Benjamí,

Something have been changed in digiKam Debian package to solve this problem ? I want mean something must be changed in current digiKam implementation ?

If no, i will close this file...

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From anaselli linux it  2006-11-06 10:26 -------
Gilles,
I'm not sure you can close the bug for that. We should
check if it is *only* a distro issue or not
recall:
Re-Add Build-Depends: libgphoto2-2-dev

IIRC, mandriva patched digikam as well to have a libgphoto-devel
dependency, now I wonder why digikam needs a devel package
to run....

My 2 €cents
Angelo
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From ach mpe mpg de  2006-11-06 11:22 -------
Hi Angelo, Gilles,

Problem is that the new libgphoto plugin names without the 'lib' prefix
are not found without the .la files that are in the -devel pkgs.

Solutions: move .la files run -devel to -runtime pkgs or find/patch
the code so plugins without 'lib' prefix are found without the .la
files (see comment #11).  Then the dependency on the -devel pkg can
be removed.

I doubt that it's digikam's fault.  IMHO the bug should not be closed
but reassigned to the 'lookup plugin' code. (remember gtkam finds the
new plugin names without problem, see comment #11)

Achim
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Marcus Meissner-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From marcus jet franken de  2006-11-06 11:34 -------
the .la files for the camlibs and ports MUST be in the runtime package.

they are NOT development files, but are used during runtime.

tell this to the libgphoto2 packager ;)
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From benjami bitassa com  2006-11-06 16:02 -------
Gilles,

Only that libgphoto2-2-dev now is needed in Debian [Sid].  Changelog says:

  * Re-Add Build-Depends: libgphoto2-2-dev
     - libgphoto2-2-dev needed (Closes: #396249)

Angelo: a friend says that in Ubuntu Edgy he have libgphoto2-2-dev dependency too.

Benjamí
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From anaselli linux it  2006-11-06 16:39 -------
> Angelo: a friend says that in Ubuntu Edgy he have libgphoto2-2-dev dependency too.

That probably means it's a packaging issue...
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Thomas Bettler]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From bettlertho sis unibe ch  2007-01-19 00:32 -------
Just a wild guess: (had this troubles too)

using udev (but maybe with wrong rules?)

1. check if it works as root
 -> if yes continue
2. check you got write permissions on your camera
$ ls -l /dev/bus/usb/*/*
 -> have a look at the respective device...
You don't? -> set them manually and check if it works now...

Solution: you probably want to update your libgphoto package to a recent version
or correct the udev rules manually.

PS: Need more information: see
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153471
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Mark Purcell]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From msp debian org  2007-01-19 19:28 -------
From a Debian perspective depending on libgphoto2-2-dev is just a workaround.

The real issue is getting the .la files into the runtime package.

We are now tracking this issue at http://bugs.debian.org/390703

Mark
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Marcus Meissner-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From marcus jet franken de  2007-01-19 19:38 -------
I wonder why digikam does not use the .so prefix.

It is very strange.

Using the .la files will fix it, but perhaps someone should
check why it does not look for .so. :/
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Marcus Meissner-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From marcus jet franken de  2007-01-19 19:39 -------
i can confirm this behavior on openSUSE 10.2 too.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Mark Purcell]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From msp debian org  2007-01-19 19:56 -------
Marcus has just informed me that the .la files are not necessary.

On Friday 19 January 2007 18:34, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Err, actually the .la files not necessary as I now know. ... Sorry for the confusion.

So what is the solution?

Does digikam need to be patched to access the .so files and not the .la files, per comment #11 from Achim above??

Mark
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Marcus Meissner-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From marcus jet franken de  2007-01-19 20:07 -------
msp: my mistake... in this case they seem to be as bug workaround for digikam.

I have tried finding on why digikam is special here, but so far not much
success.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Marcus Meissner-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From marcus jet franken de  2007-01-19 20:18 -------
Breakpoint 3, 0x00002b99bab7df70 in lt_dlopenext () from /opt/kde3/lib64/libkdecore.so.4

it has its own libltdl compiled in.

We use lt_dlopenext ("foo.so"); and it does not handle it correctly

=> the KDE libltdl version is too old for the stuff libgphoto2 does with it :(
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From ismail kde org  2007-01-19 20:32 -------
So we need to upgrade kdelibs' internal libltdl. Is that safe?
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Marcus Meissner-4]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From marcus jet franken de  2007-01-19 20:42 -------
It would help more to have LTDL_SHLIB_EXT supported in this libltdl copy.

if LTDL_SHLIB_EXT is set (to ".so" on Linux), the code would work.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From ismail kde org  2007-01-19 21:32 -------
so something like CFLAGS=-DLTDL_SHLIB_EXT=".so" ./configure should work for kdelibs?
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Norbert Pfistner]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From norbert.pfistner gmx de  2007-01-27 14:55 -------
The bug seems to be still alive with
digikam 2:0.8.2-3
libgphoto2-2 2.2.1-12
libgphoto2-2-dev 2.2.1-12
on debian testing using our canon EOS 350D in PTP mode (non-PTP mode doesn't work either, but PTP-mode worked fine before the upgrade).
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-2]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125696         




------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles kdemail net  2007-02-05 09:08 -------
Marcus,

Is the problem with digiKam Makefile.am and libgphoto2 ?

If Kamera tool work fine, well take a look of the current Makefile.am relevant here:

http://websvn.kde.org/branches/KDE/3.5/kdegraphics/kamera/kioslave/Makefile.am?rev=466285&view=auto

... and compare with digiKam Makefile.am:

==> for the camera gui :

http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/utilities/cameragui/Makefile.am?rev=610979&view=auto

Look like it's different, especially about LDFLAGS stuff and $(GPHOTO2_LIBS) witch is not present in cameragui Makefile.am.

This can be the problem ?

Gilles Caulier
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel