[Digikam-devel] [Bug 103255] wish: *add* (not edit) EXIF headers like date, comment etc

[Gilles Caulier]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103255         




------- Additional Comments From caulier.gilles free fr  2006-10-20 17:48 -------
Hey guy,

I think this tool is now complete. I'm waiting your constructive comments before to close this B.K.O file. Thanks in advance...

Gilles Caulier
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

Looks very good.

One comment: I noticed everywhere aperture is described as F{number}.
Traditionally this parameter was written as f{number} (lowercase). Was
something changed for digital photography?

m.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-2]

Le Samedi 21 Octobre 2006 14:01, Mikolaj Machowski a écrit :
> Looks very good.
>
> One comment: I noticed everywhere aperture is described as F{number}.
> Traditionally this parameter was written as f{number} (lowercase). Was
> something changed for digital photography?
>

Mikolaj, I don't understand exactly what you mean.

In camera lens, we can read "F2.8" for ewample, not "f2.8"...

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Hubert Figuiere-3]

Caulier Gilles wrote:

>> One comment: I noticed everywhere aperture is described as F{number}.
>> Traditionally this parameter was written as f{number} (lowercase). Was
>> something changed for digital photography?
>>
>
> Mikolaj, I don't understand exactly what you mean.
>
> In camera lens, we can read "F2.8" for ewample, not "f2.8"...

f/2.8 is the real notation.

And NO, digital hasn't changed anything in that area.

Hub
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-2]

On Sunday 22 October 2006 01:11, Hubert Figuiere wrote:

> Caulier Gilles wrote:
> >> One comment: I noticed everywhere aperture is described as F{number}.
> >> Traditionally this parameter was written as f{number} (lowercase). Was
> >> something changed for digital photography?
> >
> > Mikolaj, I don't understand exactly what you mean.
> >
> > In camera lens, we can read "F2.8" for ewample, not "f2.8"...
>
> f/2.8 is the real notation.

Ok fixed in MetadataEdit kipi-plugin but...

...Exiv2 report lens aperture like "F2.8" for example. It's not homogenous. If
"f/2.8" is really the good notation, please make a file in Exiv2 bugzilla
(http://dev.robotbattle.com/bugs/my_view_page.php). Me or Andreas we will fix
it. Thanks in advance.

Gilles
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel