F.J.Cruz wrote: Looks great. I've made the same tests as yesterday and this time it seems to be completeEl Jueves, 19 de Octubre de 2006 22:10, Caulier Gilles escribió:Le Mercredi 18 Octobre 2006 09:57 PM, F.J.Cruz a écrit :El Miércoles, 18 de Octubre de 2006 17:04, Oliver Dörr escribió:F.J.Cruz wrote:El Martes, 17 de Octubre de 2006 23:44, Oliver Dörr escribió:BUT there is a problem with the tarball. Some plugins are no longer translated after this test. These are Hot Pixel Correction Refocus The files are inside SVN, but not inside the tarball. Both files were not modified in the last two months. It looks like the tarball does not include all files.Just checked the france translation. Same problem. The files are inside SVN, but not inside the tarball. Additionally i checked the number of po files for each language using ls digikam*po |wc -l and got a max of 28 files inside the plugins tarball. It should be 30, if everything is translated. I found non of the two files inside the tarball. OliverThis is the same problem I had with the beta2 release. Some languages weren't included in tarballs, althought they are in the repository and I updated my local copy just before I begin to prepare the release. I sent a message to ML but nobody answered it. I don't know what is the problem.Are the files included in your local copy? If so, than the problem is inside the scripts that prepare the tarball. If not, than you have a problem with the svn up... OliverI forgot to say that I think i have to delay the official release of the beta3 version until this problem is solved, right?Yes, it's better. GillesError has been fixed. The right release_digikamimagepluing.rb file has been commited to svn repository and a new tarball has been uploaded to digikam3rdparty, please download and test. Thank you very much. From my point of view, these tarballs could be released as beta 3. Oliver _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by F.J.Cruz
Le Jeudi 19 Octobre 2006 05:55 PM, F.J.Cruz a écrit :
> El Jueves, 19 de Octubre de 2006 22:10, Caulier Gilles escribió: > > Le Mercredi 18 Octobre 2006 09:57 PM, F.J.Cruz a écrit : > > > El Miércoles, 18 de Octubre de 2006 17:04, Oliver Dörr escribió: > > > > F.J.Cruz wrote: > > > > > El Martes, 17 de Octubre de 2006 23:44, Oliver Dörr escribió: > > > > >>> BUT there is a problem with the tarball. Some plugins are no > > > > >>> longer translated after this test. These are > > > > >>> Hot Pixel Correction > > > > >>> Refocus > > > > >>> The files are inside SVN, but not inside the tarball. Both files > > > > >>> were not modified in the last two months. It looks like the > > > > >>> tarball does not include all files. > > > > >> > > > > >> Just checked the france translation. Same problem. The files are > > > > >> inside SVN, but not inside the tarball. > > > > >> > > > > >> Additionally i checked the number of po files for each language > > > > >> using > > > > >> > > > > >> ls digikam*po |wc -l > > > > >> > > > > >> and got a max of 28 files inside the plugins tarball. It should be > > > > >> 30, if everything is translated. I found non of the two files > > > > >> inside the tarball. > > > > >> > > > > >> Oliver > > > > > > > > > > This is the same problem I had with the beta2 release. Some > > > > > languages weren't included in tarballs, althought they are in the > > > > > repository and I updated my local copy just before I begin to > > > > > prepare the release. I sent a message to ML but nobody answered it. > > > > > I don't know what is the problem. > > > > > > > > Are the files included in your local copy? If so, than the problem is > > > > inside the scripts that prepare the tarball. If not, than you have a > > > > problem with the svn up... > > > > > > > > Oliver > > > > > > I forgot to say that I think i have to delay the official release of > > > the beta3 version until this problem is solved, right? > > > > Yes, it's better. > > > > Gilles > > Error has been fixed. The right release_digikamimagepluing.rb file has been > commited to svn repository and a new tarball has been uploaded to > digikam3rdparty, please download and test. > > Paco Cruz. Fine for me too. Tested on my computers sucessfully. Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by F.J.Cruz
On Thursday 19 October 2006 17:55, F.J.Cruz wrote:
> El Jueves, 19 de Octubre de 2006 22:10, Caulier Gilles escribió: > > Le Mercredi 18 Octobre 2006 09:57 PM, F.J.Cruz a écrit : > > > El Miércoles, 18 de Octubre de 2006 17:04, Oliver Dörr escribió: > > > > F.J.Cruz wrote: > > > > > El Martes, 17 de Octubre de 2006 23:44, Oliver Dörr escribió: > > > > >>> BUT there is a problem with the tarball. Some plugins are no > > > > >>> longer translated after this test. These are > > > > >>> Hot Pixel Correction > > > > >>> Refocus > > > > >>> The files are inside SVN, but not inside the tarball. Both files > > > > >>> were not modified in the last two months. It looks like the > > > > >>> tarball does not include all files. > > > > >> > > > > >> Just checked the france translation. Same problem. The files are > > > > >> inside SVN, but not inside the tarball. > > > > >> > > > > >> Additionally i checked the number of po files for each language > > > > >> using > > > > >> > > > > >> ls digikam*po |wc -l > > > > >> > > > > >> and got a max of 28 files inside the plugins tarball. It should be > > > > >> 30, if everything is translated. I found non of the two files > > > > >> inside the tarball. > > > > >> > > > > >> Oliver > > > > > > > > > > This is the same problem I had with the beta2 release. Some > > > > > languages weren't included in tarballs, althought they are in the > > > > > repository and I updated my local copy just before I begin to > > > > > prepare the release. I sent a message to ML but nobody answered it. > > > > > I don't know what is the problem. > > > > > > > > Are the files included in your local copy? If so, than the problem is > > > > inside the scripts that prepare the tarball. If not, than you have a > > > > problem with the svn up... > > > > > > > > Oliver > > > > > > I forgot to say that I think i have to delay the official release of > > > the beta3 version until this problem is solved, right? > > > > Yes, it's better. > > > > Gilles > > Error has been fixed. The right release_digikamimagepluing.rb file has been > commited to svn repository and a new tarball has been uploaded to > digikam3rdparty, please download and test. > Paco, If all is ok with tarballs, please unfreeze svn trunk commits to tag 0.9.0-beta3 in repository. Thanks in advance Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |