|
F.J.Cruz wrote: Looks great. I've made the same tests as yesterday and this time it seems to be completeEl Jueves, 19 de Octubre de 2006 22:10, Caulier Gilles escribió: Thank you very much. From my point of view, these tarballs could be released as beta 3. Oliver _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by F.J.Cruz
Le Jeudi 19 Octobre 2006 05:55 PM, F.J.Cruz a écrit :
> El Jueves, 19 de Octubre de 2006 22:10, Caulier Gilles escribió: > > Le Mercredi 18 Octobre 2006 09:57 PM, F.J.Cruz a écrit : > > > El Miércoles, 18 de Octubre de 2006 17:04, Oliver Dörr escribió: > > > > F.J.Cruz wrote: > > > > > El Martes, 17 de Octubre de 2006 23:44, Oliver Dörr escribió: > > > > >>> BUT there is a problem with the tarball. Some plugins are no > > > > >>> longer translated after this test. These are > > > > >>> Hot Pixel Correction > > > > >>> Refocus > > > > >>> The files are inside SVN, but not inside the tarball. Both files > > > > >>> were not modified in the last two months. It looks like the > > > > >>> tarball does not include all files. > > > > >> > > > > >> Just checked the france translation. Same problem. The files are > > > > >> inside SVN, but not inside the tarball. > > > > >> > > > > >> Additionally i checked the number of po files for each language > > > > >> using > > > > >> > > > > >> ls digikam*po |wc -l > > > > >> > > > > >> and got a max of 28 files inside the plugins tarball. It should be > > > > >> 30, if everything is translated. I found non of the two files > > > > >> inside the tarball. > > > > >> > > > > >> Oliver > > > > > > > > > > This is the same problem I had with the beta2 release. Some > > > > > languages weren't included in tarballs, althought they are in the > > > > > repository and I updated my local copy just before I begin to > > > > > prepare the release. I sent a message to ML but nobody answered it. > > > > > I don't know what is the problem. > > > > > > > > Are the files included in your local copy? If so, than the problem is > > > > inside the scripts that prepare the tarball. If not, than you have a > > > > problem with the svn up... > > > > > > > > Oliver > > > > > > I forgot to say that I think i have to delay the official release of > > > the beta3 version until this problem is solved, right? > > > > Yes, it's better. > > > > Gilles > > Error has been fixed. The right release_digikamimagepluing.rb file has been > commited to svn repository and a new tarball has been uploaded to > digikam3rdparty, please download and test. > > Paco Cruz. Fine for me too. Tested on my computers sucessfully. Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by F.J.Cruz
On Thursday 19 October 2006 17:55, F.J.Cruz wrote:
> El Jueves, 19 de Octubre de 2006 22:10, Caulier Gilles escribió: > > Le Mercredi 18 Octobre 2006 09:57 PM, F.J.Cruz a écrit : > > > El Miércoles, 18 de Octubre de 2006 17:04, Oliver Dörr escribió: > > > > F.J.Cruz wrote: > > > > > El Martes, 17 de Octubre de 2006 23:44, Oliver Dörr escribió: > > > > >>> BUT there is a problem with the tarball. Some plugins are no > > > > >>> longer translated after this test. These are > > > > >>> Hot Pixel Correction > > > > >>> Refocus > > > > >>> The files are inside SVN, but not inside the tarball. Both files > > > > >>> were not modified in the last two months. It looks like the > > > > >>> tarball does not include all files. > > > > >> > > > > >> Just checked the france translation. Same problem. The files are > > > > >> inside SVN, but not inside the tarball. > > > > >> > > > > >> Additionally i checked the number of po files for each language > > > > >> using > > > > >> > > > > >> ls digikam*po |wc -l > > > > >> > > > > >> and got a max of 28 files inside the plugins tarball. It should be > > > > >> 30, if everything is translated. I found non of the two files > > > > >> inside the tarball. > > > > >> > > > > >> Oliver > > > > > > > > > > This is the same problem I had with the beta2 release. Some > > > > > languages weren't included in tarballs, althought they are in the > > > > > repository and I updated my local copy just before I begin to > > > > > prepare the release. I sent a message to ML but nobody answered it. > > > > > I don't know what is the problem. > > > > > > > > Are the files included in your local copy? If so, than the problem is > > > > inside the scripts that prepare the tarball. If not, than you have a > > > > problem with the svn up... > > > > > > > > Oliver > > > > > > I forgot to say that I think i have to delay the official release of > > > the beta3 version until this problem is solved, right? > > > > Yes, it's better. > > > > Gilles > > Error has been fixed. The right release_digikamimagepluing.rb file has been > commited to svn repository and a new tarball has been uploaded to > digikam3rdparty, please download and test. > Paco, If all is ok with tarballs, please unfreeze svn trunk commits to tag 0.9.0-beta3 in repository. Thanks in advance Gilles _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
