Less than 15% of my pictures are online, and for them I keep the tags to minimum: http://www.marie-noelle-augendre.com/photos/tags.php
But I need a much more complete tags organization to manage many more pictures locally in Digikam. Marie-Noëlle 2013/2/17 jdd <[hidden email]>
-- Mes dernières photos sont dans ma galerie. Connaissez-vous Image Fixe, le photo-club de Saint Jean du Gard ? Et parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon avec Cévennes Plurielles, _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Jean-François Rabasse
Thanks for the detailed procedure: it might be handy, especially as it can be used as often as necessary.
Marie-Noëlle 2013/2/17 Jean-François Rabasse <[hidden email]> --
Mes dernières photos sont dans ma galerie. Connaissez-vous Image Fixe, le photo-club de Saint Jean du Gard ? Et parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon avec Cévennes Plurielles, _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In reply to this post by Jean-François Rabasse
Am 17.02.2013 11:56, schrieb Jean-François Rabasse:
> > For large operations (folders reorganisation, rereading metadata for many > images, etc.) it's slow and I also happened to have problems, crashes or > so. Not to be nervous, I took the habit to do that on a copy of database, > and I/O access to the SQLite file can be enhanced when using a ramdisk. > Linux supports that very well, so : > - backup /.../digikam4.db to ... digikam3.db.backup > - copy the file to ramdisk, /dev/shm/digikam4.db > - start DK with option : --database-directory /dev/shm > - work... > - when all is ok, satisfying results, no corruptions, no crashes, copy > the ramdisk file back to original place /.../digikam4.db > (Before shutting down the computer:-) > In case of problem, just forget, nothing is lost. The main problem with this: you have to do to much by hand. While this is no problem for me, it is for my other users. I have a simmilar setup but automated. I use shared computers so it is more general - I copy my home folder from server to client at login and back to the server at logout. Most clients use SSDs, so shared memory is not that much faster. The server has a daily backup, so the risk to crash my DB and loose everything is low. The shared system is the reason I still use sqlite. Wireless clients sometimes loose the connection (so digikam will fail with a centralized DB server). An I want to use digikam with the local photos without even been connected to my network. Martin > > Regards, > Jean-François > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |