Digikam 0.2?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Digikam 0.2?

Dotan Cohen
I see that there is a Digikam 0.2 planned:
http://www.digikam.org/?q=about/releaseplan

Is that not a typo? 0.2 < 0.9 so this seems weird. I can understand
0.10 replacing 0.9 as the dot may not be a decimal point, but in any
case going back to 0.2 seems counterintuitive.

--
Dotan Cohen

http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il

א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
ا-ب-ت-ث-ج-ح-خ-د-ذ-ر-ز-س-ش-ص-ض-ط-ظ-ع-غ-ف-ق-ك-ل-م-ن-ه‍-و-ي
А-Б-В-Г-Д-Е-Ё-Ж-З-И-Й-К-Л-М-Н-О-П-Р-С-Т-У-Ф-Х-Ц-Ч-Ш-Щ-Ъ-Ы-Ь-Э-Ю-Я
а-б-в-г-д-е-ё-ж-з-и-й-к-л-м-н-о-п-р-с-т-у-ф-х-ц-ч-ш-щ-ъ-ы-ь-э-ю-я
ä-ö-ü-ß-Ä-Ö-Ü
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Digikam 0.2?

Dotan Cohen
2008/12/8 Dotan Cohen <[hidden email]>:
> I see that there is a Digikam 0.2 planned:
> http://www.digikam.org/?q=about/releaseplan
>
> Is that not a typo? 0.2 < 0.9 so this seems weird. I can understand
> 0.10 replacing 0.9 as the dot may not be a decimal point, but in any
> case going back to 0.2 seems counterintuitive.
>

Sorry, false alarm, I see that is kipi-plugins 0.2! You may plonk me now...

--
Dotan Cohen

http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il

א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
ا-ب-ت-ث-ج-ح-خ-د-ذ-ر-ز-س-ش-ص-ض-ط-ظ-ع-غ-ف-ق-ك-ل-م-ن-ه‍-و-ي
А-Б-В-Г-Д-Е-Ё-Ж-З-И-Й-К-Л-М-Н-О-П-Р-С-Т-У-Ф-Х-Ц-Ч-Ш-Щ-Ъ-Ы-Ь-Э-Ю-Я
а-б-в-г-д-е-ё-ж-з-и-й-к-л-м-н-о-п-р-с-т-у-ф-х-ц-ч-ш-щ-ъ-ы-ь-э-ю-я
ä-ö-ü-ß-Ä-Ö-Ü
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Digikam 0.2?

Bugzilla from andi.clemens@gmx.net
PLONK!!

;-)


On Monday 08 December 2008 12:32:41 Dotan Cohen wrote:
> 2008/12/8 Dotan Cohen <[hidden email]>:
> > I see that there is a Digikam 0.2 planned:
> > http://www.digikam.org/?q=about/releaseplan
> >
> > Is that not a typo? 0.2 < 0.9 so this seems weird. I can understand
> > 0.10 replacing 0.9 as the dot may not be a decimal point, but in any
> > case going back to 0.2 seems counterintuitive.
>
> Sorry, false alarm, I see that is kipi-plugins 0.2! You may plonk me now...

_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users