Compiling from git
Locked
12
12
 
|
I'm now in the compiling process, or trying to ...
The 'cmake digikam-softwarer-compilation' brings a lot of errors, the first one being: "-- The CXX compiler identification is unknown CMake Error: your CXX compiler: "CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER-NOTFOUND" was not found. Please set CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER to a valid compiler path or name." I have already installed the whole group "Développement de logiciel KDE", but that seems to make no difference. Here is the content of this group: Groupe : Développement de logiciel KDE Description : Installer ces paquets pour développer les applications graphiques QT et KDE. Paquets mandataires : cmake kdelibs-devel qt-devel Paquets par défaut : PyKDE4-devel PyQt4-devel kdebase-workspace-devel kdepimlibs-devel kdesdk kdevelop Paquets optionnels : PyKDE-devel PyQt-devel gambas2-runtime kdbg kdebase-devel kdebindings-devel kdeedu-devel kdegames-devel kdegraphics-devel kdelibs3-devel kdemultimedia-devel kdenetwork-devel kdepim-devel kdesvn kdewebdev-devel krazy2 qt-creator qt-mobility-devel qt3-designer qt3-devel So, what I'm missing now? Thanks for your answers, Marie-Noëlle -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
At this point I would start to install gcc
Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>schreef: >I'm now in the compiling process, or trying to ... > >The 'cmake digikam-softwarer-compilation' brings a lot of errors, the >first one being: >"-- The CXX compiler identification is unknown >CMake Error: your CXX compiler: "CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER-NOTFOUND" was not >found. Please set CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER to a valid compiler path or >name." > >I have already installed the whole group "Développement de logiciel >KDE", but that seems to make no difference. Here is the content of >this group: >Groupe : Développement de logiciel KDE > Description : Installer ces paquets pour développer les applications >graphiques QT et KDE. > Paquets mandataires : > cmake > kdelibs-devel > qt-devel > Paquets par défaut : > PyKDE4-devel > PyQt4-devel > kdebase-workspace-devel > kdepimlibs-devel > kdesdk > kdevelop > Paquets optionnels : > PyKDE-devel > PyQt-devel > gambas2-runtime > kdbg > kdebase-devel > kdebindings-devel > kdeedu-devel > kdegames-devel > kdegraphics-devel > kdelibs3-devel > kdemultimedia-devel > kdenetwork-devel > kdepim-devel > kdesvn > kdewebdev-devel > krazy2 > qt-creator > qt-mobility-devel > qt3-designer > qt3-devel > >So, what I'm missing now? > >Thanks for your answers, >Marie-Noëlle > >-- >Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe > >Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles > >Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale >_______________________________________________ >Digikam-users mailing list >[hidden email] >https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Well, gcc is installed too (see below); so, unless I need something
else related to gcc ... Marie-Noëlle Paquets installés gcc.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201105131943.x86_64 Paquets disponibles gcc-base-debuginfo.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates-debuginfo gcc-c++.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates gcc-debuginfo.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates-debuginfo gcc-gfortran.i686 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates gcc-gfortran.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates gcc-gnat.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates gcc-go.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates gcc-java.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates gcc-objc.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates gcc-objc++.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates gcc-plugin-devel.i686 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates gcc-plugin-devel.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates gccxml.x86_64 0.9.0-0.6.20110211.fc15 fedora gccxml-debuginfo.x86_64 0.9.0-0.6.20110211.fc15 fedora-debuginfo 2011/8/24 Rinus <[hidden email]>: > At this point I would start to install gcc > -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by tosca
It looks like something is missing or not found. Is make installed?
Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>schreef: >Well, gcc is installed too (see below); so, unless I need something >else related to gcc ... > >Marie-Noëlle > > >Paquets installés >gcc.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 >@anaconda-InstallationRepo-201105131943.x86_64 >Paquets disponibles >gcc-base-debuginfo.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates-debuginfo >gcc-c++.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >gcc-debuginfo.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates-debuginfo >gcc-gfortran.i686 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >gcc-gfortran.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >gcc-gnat.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >gcc-go.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >gcc-java.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >gcc-objc.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >gcc-objc++.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >gcc-plugin-devel.i686 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >gcc-plugin-devel.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >gccxml.x86_64 0.9.0-0.6.20110211.fc15 fedora >gccxml-debuginfo.x86_64 0.9.0-0.6.20110211.fc15 fedora-debuginfo > > > >2011/8/24 Rinus <[hidden email]>: >> At this point I would start to install gcc >> > >-- >Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe > >Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles > >Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale >_______________________________________________ >Digikam-users mailing list >[hidden email] >https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Found the answer on the Ubuntu forum: the C++ compiler was apparently needed.
Now it's installed and this error has disappeared. Thanks, Marie-Noëlle 2011/8/24 Rinus <[hidden email]>: > It looks like something is missing or not found. Is make installed? > > Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>schreef: > -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Rinus
Op 24-08-11 10:57, Rinus schreef
is cpp installed? Rinus > It looks like something is missing or not found. Is make installed? > > Marie-Noëlle Augendre<[hidden email]>schreef: > >> Well, gcc is installed too (see below); so, unless I need something >> else related to gcc ... >> >> Marie-Noëlle >> >> >> Paquets installés >> gcc.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 >> @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201105131943.x86_64 >> Paquets disponibles >> gcc-base-debuginfo.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates-debuginfo >> gcc-c++.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >> gcc-debuginfo.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates-debuginfo >> gcc-gfortran.i686 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >> gcc-gfortran.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >> gcc-gnat.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >> gcc-go.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >> gcc-java.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >> gcc-objc.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >> gcc-objc++.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >> gcc-plugin-devel.i686 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >> gcc-plugin-devel.x86_64 4.6.0-10.fc15 updates >> gccxml.x86_64 0.9.0-0.6.20110211.fc15 fedora >> gccxml-debuginfo.x86_64 0.9.0-0.6.20110211.fc15 fedora-debuginfo >> >> >> >> 2011/8/24 Rinus<[hidden email]>: >>> At this point I would start to install gcc >>> >> -- >> Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe >> >> Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles >> >> Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by tosca
Am 24.08.2011 11:01, schrieb Marie-Noëlle Augendre:
> Found the answer on the Ubuntu forum: the C++ compiler was apparently needed. > Now it's installed and this error has disappeared. To get most of the required libs and bins you can download the source RPM from fedora (recent one from kde-testing) and install it with yum. dependencies are resolved automatically. After this you can delete the installed source RPM and you need only to fetch the required newer versions. Martin > > Thanks, > Marie-Noëlle > > 2011/8/24 Rinus <[hidden email]>: >> It looks like something is missing or not found. Is make installed? >> >> Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>schreef: >> > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Rinus
On Fedora the package is called gcc-c++, and yes I just installed it,
and the compilation is currently running. Marie-Noëlle 2011/8/24 sleepless <[hidden email]>: > Op 24-08-11 10:57, Rinus schreef > is cpp installed? > Rinus >> -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by Martin (KDE)
Hi Martin,
I'm not sure which package you're refering to: gcc-c++? digikam? I'm not sure I'm competent enough to 'play with' RPM like that ... Marie-Noëlle 2011/8/24 Martin (KDE) <[hidden email]>: > Am 24.08.2011 11:01, schrieb Marie-Noëlle Augendre: >> Found the answer on the Ubuntu forum: the C++ compiler was apparently needed. >> Now it's installed and this error has disappeared. > > To get most of the required libs and bins you can download the source > RPM from fedora (recent one from kde-testing) and install it with yum. > dependencies are resolved automatically. After this you can delete the > installed source RPM and you need only to fetch the required newer versions. > > Martin > >> -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Am 24.08.2011 11:23, schrieb Marie-Noëlle Augendre:
> Hi Martin, > > I'm not sure which package you're refering to: gcc-c++? digikam? All the libs and executables you need to compile digikam. > I'm not sure I'm competent enough to 'play with' RPM like that ... This is nothing you play with. Simply search for fedora digikam 2.0 source RPM (srpm), copy this to your local harddisk and run yum localinstall /path/to/digikam*.srpm all other packages you need to compile this source rpm are installed as dependencies automatically. You can remove the digikam source rpm afterwards but the dependencies are still there. It is of much higher risk to install libs from source which may be already installed but without development package (libs usually have a -develop package too). Martin > > Marie-Noëlle > > 2011/8/24 Martin (KDE) <[hidden email]>: >> Am 24.08.2011 11:01, schrieb Marie-Noëlle Augendre: >>> Found the answer on the Ubuntu forum: the C++ compiler was apparently needed. >>> Now it's installed and this error has disappeared. >> >> To get most of the required libs and bins you can download the source >> RPM from fedora (recent one from kde-testing) and install it with yum. >> dependencies are resolved automatically. After this you can delete the >> installed source RPM and you need only to fetch the required newer versions. >> >> Martin >> >>> > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
2011/8/24 Martin (KDE) <[hidden email]>:
> Am 24.08.2011 11:23, schrieb Marie-Noëlle Augendre: >> Hi Martin, >> >> I'm not sure which package you're refering to: gcc-c++? digikam? > > All the libs and executables you need to compile digikam. > >> I'm not sure I'm competent enough to 'play with' RPM like that ... > > This is nothing you play with. Simply search for fedora digikam 2.0 > source RPM (srpm), copy this to your local harddisk and run > > yum localinstall /path/to/digikam*.srpm > > all other packages you need to compile this source rpm are installed as > dependencies automatically. You can remove the digikam source rpm > afterwards but the dependencies are still there. > > It is of much higher risk to install libs from source which may be > already installed but without development package (libs usually have a > -develop package too). > > Martin > Thanks for the information. I'll try this as soon as the occasion arises. As for now, I've completed the cmake step; but when I try 'make install' as root, I get the following message: make: *** Aucune règle pour fabriquer la cible « install ». Arrêt. and I don't understand what's going on, nor how to solve the problem. Marie-Noëlle -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by tosca
Did you give the make install command from the same directory as the make command?
Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>schreef: >2011/8/24 Martin (KDE) <[hidden email]>: >> Am 24.08.2011 11:23, schrieb Marie-Noëlle Augendre: >>> Hi Martin, >>> >>> I'm not sure which package you're refering to: gcc-c++? digikam? >> >> All the libs and executables you need to compile digikam. >> >>> I'm not sure I'm competent enough to 'play with' RPM like that ... >> >> This is nothing you play with. Simply search for fedora digikam 2.0 >> source RPM (srpm), copy this to your local harddisk and run >> >> yum localinstall /path/to/digikam*.srpm >> >> all other packages you need to compile this source rpm are installed as >> dependencies automatically. You can remove the digikam source rpm >> afterwards but the dependencies are still there. >> >> It is of much higher risk to install libs from source which may be >> already installed but without development package (libs usually have a >> -develop package too). >> >> Martin >> > >Thanks for the information. I'll try this as soon as the occasion arises. > >As for now, I've completed the cmake step; but when I try 'make >install' as root, I get the following message: >make: *** Aucune règle pour fabriquer la cible « install ». Arrêt. > >and I don't understand what's going on, nor how to solve the problem. > >Marie-Noëlle > >-- >Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe > >Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles > >Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale >_______________________________________________ >Digikam-users mailing list >[hidden email] >https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by tosca
O well it looks like you forgot after the cmake the make process entirely?
Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>schreef: >2011/8/24 Martin (KDE) <[hidden email]>: >> Am 24.08.2011 11:23, schrieb Marie-Noëlle Augendre: >>> Hi Martin, >>> >>> I'm not sure which package you're refering to: gcc-c++? digikam? >> >> All the libs and executables you need to compile digikam. >> >>> I'm not sure I'm competent enough to 'play with' RPM like that ... >> >> This is nothing you play with. Simply search for fedora digikam 2.0 >> source RPM (srpm), copy this to your local harddisk and run >> >> yum localinstall /path/to/digikam*.srpm >> >> all other packages you need to compile this source rpm are installed as >> dependencies automatically. You can remove the digikam source rpm >> afterwards but the dependencies are still there. >> >> It is of much higher risk to install libs from source which may be >> already installed but without development package (libs usually have a >> -develop package too). >> >> Martin >> > >Thanks for the information. I'll try this as soon as the occasion arises. > >As for now, I've completed the cmake step; but when I try 'make >install' as root, I get the following message: >make: *** Aucune règle pour fabriquer la cible « install ». Arrêt. > >and I don't understand what's going on, nor how to solve the problem. > >Marie-Noëlle > >-- >Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe > >Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles > >Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale >_______________________________________________ >Digikam-users mailing list >[hidden email] >https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Arrghh !!! I did it once again, just to be on the safe side ... but I
was still working as root!!! What did you need to remove when you did that, before running 'make' again as a normal user? Marie-Noëlle 2011/8/24 Rinus <[hidden email]>: > O well it looks like you forgot after the cmake the make process entirely? > -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by tosca
I removed everyting and started from scratch, that,s what Gilles told me to do, sorry to tell you so
Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>schreef: >Arrghh !!! I did it once again, just to be on the safe side ... but I >was still working as root!!! >What did you need to remove when you did that, before running 'make' >again as a normal user? > >Marie-Noëlle > >2011/8/24 Rinus <[hidden email]>: >> O well it looks like you forgot after the cmake the make process entirely? >> > > > >-- >Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe > >Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles > >Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale >_______________________________________________ >Digikam-users mailing list >[hidden email] >https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Before doing anything nasty/hasty, I would like very much to
understand where all this procedure is going to put the files/folders it'll be using. At the moment my /home folder is full of things I don't want here ... isn't it possible to do that in a subfolder? By the way, what is the digikam-software-compilation for? the git clone? temporary files for the compilation? And I wouldn't like to have to clone the git one more time, as my connection is very poor, and I took me a great more time than any of you, I think. Marie-Noëlle 2011/8/24 Rinus <[hidden email]>: > I removed everyting and started from scratch, that,s what Gilles told me to do, sorry to tell you so > > Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>schreef: > >>Arrghh !!! I did it once again, just to be on the safe side ... but I >>was still working as root!!! >>What did you need to remove when you did that, before running 'make' >>again as a normal user? >> >>Marie-Noëlle >> -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Normaly digikam is in your home/your_user_dir/digikam-software-compilation
everything should be there. It is a good praktice to make a subfolder ¨build¨ from where you build, so your git clone would not be messed up, but if you did not, it is hard to tell by now what is original and what is not. If you did, you can delete the entire buildfolder and try again. But the make process might have put elsewhwere on the system files whit root access, the next time you try it complains about not having access to files and then you have the rights on individual files, as I had to yesterday several times in spite of deleting entire digikam and makin a new clone. Op 24-08-11 13:54, Marie-Noëlle Augendre schreef: > Before doing anything nasty/hasty, I would like very much to > understand where all this procedure is going to put the files/folders > it'll be using. > At the moment my /home folder is full of things I don't want here ... > isn't it possible to do that in a subfolder? > By the way, what is the digikam-software-compilation for? the git > clone? temporary files for the compilation? both, there is a command to clean it up afterwards, I think something like make install clean or something like that. > And I wouldn't like to have to clone the git one more time, as my > connection is very poor, and I took me a great more time than any of > you, I think. > > Marie-Noëlle > > 2011/8/24 Rinus<[hidden email]>: >> I removed everyting and started from scratch, that,s what Gilles told me to do, sorry to tell you so >> >> Marie-Noëlle Augendre<[hidden email]>schreef: >> >>> Arrghh !!! I did it once again, just to be on the safe side ... but I >>> was still working as root!!! >>> What did you need to remove when you did that, before running 'make' >>> again as a normal user? >>> >>> Marie-Noëlle >>> > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by tosca
2011/8/24 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>:
> 2011/8/24 Martin (KDE) <[hidden email]>: >> Am 24.08.2011 11:23, schrieb Marie-Noëlle Augendre: >>> Hi Martin, >>> >>> I'm not sure which package you're refering to: gcc-c++? digikam? >> >> All the libs and executables you need to compile digikam. >> >>> I'm not sure I'm competent enough to 'play with' RPM like that ... >> >> This is nothing you play with. Simply search for fedora digikam 2.0 >> source RPM (srpm), copy this to your local harddisk and run >> >> yum localinstall /path/to/digikam*.srpm >> >> all other packages you need to compile this source rpm are installed as >> dependencies automatically. You can remove the digikam source rpm >> afterwards but the dependencies are still there. >> >> It is of much higher risk to install libs from source which may be >> already installed but without development package (libs usually have a >> -develop package too). >> >> Martin >> > > Thanks for the information. I'll try this as soon as the occasion arises. > I'm trying your procedure to retrieve the source, but I don't know how to do that: - with yum, I know the --enablerepo clause, but I don't know hom to find the (name of the) source - with rpm - which I have used very scarcely up to now - I have no idea how to specifiy the repo Marie-Noëlle -- Une galerie photos, un blog ... pourquoi pas ? Webmaster en herbe Parcourez les Cévennes à ma façon : Cévennes Plurielles Et toutes mes autres publications à partir de ma page d'accueil générale _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Just in case you need to reclone git, I can confirm that the procedure
according to gert kello´s input works a lot better: cd ~ git clone git://anongit.kde.org/digikam-software-compilation digikam-software-compilation cd digikam-software-compilation perl download-repos Rinus Op 24-08-11 14:40, Marie-Noëlle Augendre schreef: > 2011/8/24 Marie-Noëlle Augendre<[hidden email]>: >> 2011/8/24 Martin (KDE)<[hidden email]>: >>> Am 24.08.2011 11:23, schrieb Marie-Noëlle Augendre: >>>> Hi Martin, >>>> >>>> I'm not sure which package you're refering to: gcc-c++? digikam? >>> All the libs and executables you need to compile digikam. >>> >>>> I'm not sure I'm competent enough to 'play with' RPM like that ... >>> This is nothing you play with. Simply search for fedora digikam 2.0 >>> source RPM (srpm), copy this to your local harddisk and run >>> >>> yum localinstall /path/to/digikam*.srpm >>> >>> all other packages you need to compile this source rpm are installed as >>> dependencies automatically. You can remove the digikam source rpm >>> afterwards but the dependencies are still there. >>> >>> It is of much higher risk to install libs from source which may be >>> already installed but without development package (libs usually have a >>> -develop package too). >>> >>> Martin >>> >> Thanks for the information. I'll try this as soon as the occasion arises. >> > I'm trying your procedure to retrieve the source, but I don't know how > to do that: > > - with yum, I know the --enablerepo clause, but I don't know hom to > find the (name of the) source > - with rpm - which I have used very scarcely up to now - I have no > idea how to specifiy the repo > > Marie-Noëlle > > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
In reply to this post by tosca
Am 24.08.2011 14:40, schrieb Marie-Noëlle Augendre:
> 2011/8/24 Marie-Noëlle Augendre <[hidden email]>: >> 2011/8/24 Martin (KDE) <[hidden email]>: >>> Am 24.08.2011 11:23, schrieb Marie-Noëlle Augendre: >>>> Hi Martin, >>>> >>>> I'm not sure which package you're refering to: gcc-c++? digikam? >>> >>> All the libs and executables you need to compile digikam. >>> >>>> I'm not sure I'm competent enough to 'play with' RPM like that ... >>> >>> This is nothing you play with. Simply search for fedora digikam 2.0 >>> source RPM (srpm), copy this to your local harddisk and run >>> >>> yum localinstall /path/to/digikam*.srpm >>> >>> all other packages you need to compile this source rpm are installed as >>> dependencies automatically. You can remove the digikam source rpm >>> afterwards but the dependencies are still there. >>> >>> It is of much higher risk to install libs from source which may be >>> already installed but without development package (libs usually have a >>> -develop package too). >>> >>> Martin >>> >> >> Thanks for the information. I'll try this as soon as the occasion arises. >> > > I'm trying your procedure to retrieve the source, but I don't know how > to do that: > At first hand: none. download digikam (from ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/fedora/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/digikam-2.0.0-4.fc17.src.rpm for example) and install it (with yum localinstall). Otherwise you have to search for a kde-testing repo with src. The default fedora one does not provide source RPMs. > - with yum, I know the --enablerepo clause, but I don't know hom to > find the (name of the) source I don't know a repo with testing src rpms. > - with rpm - which I have used very scarcely up to now - I have no > idea how to specifiy the repo plain rpm does not know anything about repos. This is yum stuff only. Martin > > Marie-Noëlle > > > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
«
Return to digikam-users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |