Compilation trace under win32 using mingw...

[Gilles Caulier-4]

HI all,

digiKam now compile fine under my Windows computer using MinGw  (http://www.mingw.org).

I use KDE 4.1.2 (using official KDE4 Win32 packages installer - http://windows.kde.org), patched with Patrick Spendrin QT 4.4.0 packages (else nothing can be compiled - official packages are broken for developpement purpose)

I have attached with this mail digiKam compilation trace under win32. Like you can see, new warnings appears, and must be fixed if possible.

I plan to do the same with official M$ compiler (under win32, both are possible). Other warnings will be discovered i think.

The advantage to compile on different platform is to see compilation cases unreproducible under Linux and to improve implementation.

Please let's me hear your viewpoints...

Thanks in advance

Gilles Caulier

PS: I will start to play with digiKam for Win32. I can already see any dysfunctions in startup and thumbbar.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

I also tried to compile digiKam on window yesterday, but in virtualbox this is
too slow and something went wrong. I was not too motivated to find the error
though :-)
Maybe I'll give it another try someday.

Andi

On Wednesday 22 October 2008 07:35:18 Gilles Caulier wrote:

> HI all,
>
> digiKam now compile fine under my Windows computer using MinGw  (
> http://www.mingw.org).
>
> I use KDE 4.1.2 (using official KDE4 Win32 packages installer -
> http://windows.kde.org), patched with Patrick Spendrin QT 4.4.0 packages
> (else nothing can be compiled - official packages are broken for
> developpement purpose)
>
> I have attached with this mail digiKam compilation trace under win32. Like
> you can see, new warnings appears, and must be fixed if possible.
>
> I plan to do the same with official M$ compiler (under win32, both are
> possible). Other warnings will be discovered i think.
>
> The advantage to compile on different platform is to see compilation cases
> unreproducible under Linux and to improve implementation.
>
> Please let's me hear your viewpoints...
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> PS: I will start to play with digiKam for Win32. I can already see any
> dysfunctions in startup and thumbbar.

_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Patrick Spendrin]

Andi Clemens schrieb:
> I also tried to compile digiKam on window yesterday, but in virtualbox this is
> too slow and something went wrong. I was not too motivated to find the error
> though :-)
> Maybe I'll give it another try someday.
For any questions, you can either ask me as well, or simply join
#kde-windows channel or [hidden email] mailing list.

>
> Andi
>
> On Wednesday 22 October 2008 07:35:18 Gilles Caulier wrote:
>> HI all,
>>
>> digiKam now compile fine under my Windows computer using MinGw  (
>> http://www.mingw.org).
>>
>> I use KDE 4.1.2 (using official KDE4 Win32 packages installer -
>> http://windows.kde.org), patched with Patrick Spendrin QT 4.4.0 packages
>> (else nothing can be compiled - official packages are broken for
>> developpement purpose)

Those should be available now again (they haven't been renamed yet, but
the current packages should work again).

>>
>> I have attached with this mail digiKam compilation trace under win32. Like
>> you can see, new warnings appears, and must be fixed if possible.
>>
>> I plan to do the same with official M$ compiler (under win32, both are
>> possible). Other warnings will be discovered i think.
>>
>> The advantage to compile on different platform is to see compilation cases
>> unreproducible under Linux and to improve implementation.
>>
>> Please let's me hear your viewpoints...
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> PS: I will start to play with digiKam for Win32. I can already see any
>> dysfunctions in startup and thumbbar.

regards,
Patrick
--
web:                 http://windows.kde.org
mailing list:        [hidden email]
irc:                 #kde-windows (irc.freenode.net)
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel