Choose another ICC profile for converting pictures

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
22 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Choose another ICC profile for converting pictures

Milan Knížek-2
V Fri, 7 Oct 2011 18:00:01 +0200
Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]> napsáno:

> > If it's easy to enable soft-proofing in Digikam with any ICC
> > profile you want (for instance photoweb-V4.icc), in the color space
> > convertion tool, you only can choose the default kdcraw profiles
> > (ie sRGB, Adobe RGB, Wide Gamut and Kodak Prophoto RGB) and the
> > screen profiles installed on the system, but not another profile
> > like photoweb-V4.icc (even if its placed in the same folder than
> > the others profiles).  
>
> It's a matter of a single line of code to add output profiles to the
> combo box as well. Question to the expertise assembled in this list:
> Should we do it?

I vote for it.

I addition to the editor, it might make sense to have this function
also part of the "export" plugins - some may have ProPhoto/AdobeRGB
as default workspace and sending images out to other users/web/whatever
in these wide gamut spaces is usually not a good idea. Though, it might
be more then a single line of code then :-)

Regards,
Milan

--
http://www.milan-knizek.net/
About linux and photography (Czech only)
O linuxu a fotografování
_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re : Choose another ICC profile for converting pictures

Paulux

>> It's a matter of a single line of code to add output profiles to the
>> combo box as well. Question to the expertise assembled in this list:
>> Should we do it?
>
>I vote for it.
>
>I addition to the editor, it might make sense to have this function
>also part of the "export" plugins - some may have ProPhoto/AdobeRGB
>as default workspace and sending images out to other users/web/whatever
>in these wide gamut spaces is usually not a good idea. Though, it might
>be more then a single line of code then :-)

That would be perfect !!! And will be a better way to process than the one I purposed. 




>Regards,
>Milan


_______________________________________________
Digikam-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
12