Can I delete this tag?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Can I delete this tag?

cool.chris65

Hi,

 

inside my list of tags I found a tag called "_digikam_internal_tag_" - is ist important, or can I delete it?

 

(Using DK 5.3.0 appimage)
--

GPG-Fingerabdruck: B578 8557 B9B1 354B 3A91 1CC0 5E3C 7538 7C91 0837

GPG-Kennung: 7C910837

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Can I delete this tag?

Gilles Caulier-4
This one appear because of older DB mysql scheme.

In new one, this tags was removed and this permit to fix few bugs with Mysql.

But migrating DK version do not solve it (remove this internal tag). Of course we have tried, but it do not work...

Solution. Create a new fresh DB with new scheme as well. If you store DK images properties in file metadata, DB creation will be safe.

Gilles Caulier

2016-11-06 11:35 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:

Hi,

 

inside my list of tags I found a tag called "_digikam_internal_tag_" - is ist important, or can I delete it?

 

(Using DK 5.3.0 appimage)
--

GPG-Fingerabdruck: B578 8557 B9B1 354B 3A91 1CC0 5E3C 7538 7C91 0837

GPG-Kennung: 7C910837


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Can I delete this tag?

cool.chris65

Hi,

 

Actually (since DK 5.1.0) I'm using an external MySQL-server - not the internal sql-engine of DK, so I have also to delete an recreate the database newly?

 

Maybe it happens on rereading the metadata from the pics/sidecarfiles after a db-lost during a migration?

 

This tag is only viewable into the geotagging-module, not in the main window ...

 

Greetz, Christoph

 

Am Sonntag, 6. November 2016, 15:07:31 CET schrieb Gilles Caulier:

> This one appear because of older DB mysql scheme.

 

> In new one, this tags was removed and this permit to fix few bugs with

> Mysql.

> But migrating DK version do not solve it (remove this internal tag). Of

> course we have tried, but it do not work...

> Solution. Create a new fresh DB with new scheme as well. If you store DK

> images properties in file metadata, DB creation will be safe.

> Gilles Caulier

>

> 2016-11-06 11:35 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:

> > Hi,

> >

> >

> >

> > inside my list of tags I found a tag called "_digikam_internal_tag_" - is

> > ist important, or can I delete it?

> >

> >

> >

> > (Using DK 5.3.0 appimage)

> > --

> >

> > GPG-Fingerabdruck: B578 8557 B9B1 354B 3A91 1CC0 5E3C 7538 7C91 0837

> >

> > GPG-Kennung: 7C910837

 


--

GPG-Fingerabdruck: B578 8557 B9B1 354B 3A91 1CC0 5E3C 7538 7C91 0837

GPG-Kennung: 7C910837

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Can I delete this tag?

Gilles Caulier-4


2016-11-06 20:08 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:

Hi,

 

Actually (since DK 5.1.0) I'm using an external MySQL-server - not the internal sql-engine of DK, so I have also to delete an recreate the database newly?


yes it is. Look well the instructions given in handbook


All is explained. If something is missing, don't hesitate to give a feedback to patch handbook.

I use also for testing a mariadb remote server here hosted on a NAS, and it work as expected.

 

Maybe it happens on rereading the metadata from the pics/sidecarfiles after a db-lost during a migration?


exactly
 

 

This tag is only viewable into the geotagging-module, not in the main window ...


Yes i know. We pass a lots of time while this summer to fix this problem. A very complex one and a legacy given by an old contributor who have work on mysql support (of course he left the project just after to complete the code...)

Gilles Caulier 

 

Greetz, Christoph

 

Am Sonntag, 6. November 2016, 15:07:31 CET schrieb Gilles Caulier:

> This one appear because of older DB mysql scheme.

 

> In new one, this tags was removed and this permit to fix few bugs with

> Mysql.

> But migrating DK version do not solve it (remove this internal tag). Of

> course we have tried, but it do not work...

> Solution. Create a new fresh DB with new scheme as well. If you store DK

> images properties in file metadata, DB creation will be safe.

> Gilles Caulier

>

> 2016-11-06 11:35 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:

> > Hi,

> >

> >

> >

> > inside my list of tags I found a tag called "_digikam_internal_tag_" - is

> > ist important, or can I delete it?

> >

> >

> >

> > (Using DK 5.3.0 appimage)

> > --

> >

> > GPG-Fingerabdruck: B578 8557 B9B1 354B 3A91 1CC0 5E3C 7538 7C91 0837

> >

> > GPG-Kennung: 7C910837

 


--

GPG-Fingerabdruck: B578 8557 B9B1 354B 3A91 1CC0 5E3C 7538 7C91 0837

GPG-Kennung: 7C910837


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Can I delete this tag?

Gilles Caulier-4
Note : digiKam 5.3.0 is out. tarball and bundles are under uploading. All will be available in KDE server tomorrow morning i think. Be patient (:=)))...

Best

Gilles Caulier

2016-11-06 20:16 GMT+01:00 Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>:


2016-11-06 20:08 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:

Hi,

 

Actually (since DK 5.1.0) I'm using an external MySQL-server - not the internal sql-engine of DK, so I have also to delete an recreate the database newly?


yes it is. Look well the instructions given in handbook


All is explained. If something is missing, don't hesitate to give a feedback to patch handbook.

I use also for testing a mariadb remote server here hosted on a NAS, and it work as expected.

 

Maybe it happens on rereading the metadata from the pics/sidecarfiles after a db-lost during a migration?


exactly
 

 

This tag is only viewable into the geotagging-module, not in the main window ...


Yes i know. We pass a lots of time while this summer to fix this problem. A very complex one and a legacy given by an old contributor who have work on mysql support (of course he left the project just after to complete the code...)

Gilles Caulier 

 

Greetz, Christoph

 

Am Sonntag, 6. November 2016, 15:07:31 CET schrieb Gilles Caulier:

> This one appear because of older DB mysql scheme.

 

> In new one, this tags was removed and this permit to fix few bugs with

> Mysql.

> But migrating DK version do not solve it (remove this internal tag). Of

> course we have tried, but it do not work...

> Solution. Create a new fresh DB with new scheme as well. If you store DK

> images properties in file metadata, DB creation will be safe.

> Gilles Caulier

>

> 2016-11-06 11:35 GMT+01:00 [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:

> > Hi,

> >

> >

> >

> > inside my list of tags I found a tag called "_digikam_internal_tag_" - is

> > ist important, or can I delete it?

> >

> >

> >

> > (Using DK 5.3.0 appimage)

> > --

> >

> > GPG-Fingerabdruck: B578 8557 B9B1 354B 3A91 1CC0 5E3C 7538 7C91 0837

> >

> > GPG-Kennung: 7C910837

 


--

GPG-Fingerabdruck: B578 8557 B9B1 354B 3A91 1CC0 5E3C 7538 7C91 0837

GPG-Kennung: 7C910837