I just started working with digiKam (again) and have tried both v1.4.0
and v1.5.0 (from the philip5 ppa) in Kubuntu Maverick and neither version's calendar view seems to be working off of the EXIF date. When I select, for example, 2010 -> October I get a bunch of images from this month but also some that have creation and modification dates this month but EXIF dates from various other times. The documentation states that: "digiKam uses either the EXIF date or, if no EXIF date is available, the last modification time of the file." http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/using-kapp.html#using-mydatesview but that is not what I am observing. A screenshot is available at: http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view.png In that shot you can see the calendar view selection (October 2010), the modification and creation dates (October 25, 2010), and the EXIF date (December 23, 2007). Is there any option for this now or does the documentation need to be updated? Thanks for the great software and any help you can offer on this matter. Cheers, -kyle _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
In Exif view of this image, turn on full tags list and look other date
information. Use tags filters if necessary. This is the order of Exif/Xmp/IPTC tags used to fill date timestamp in digiKam database : http://lxr.kde.org/source/KDE/kdegraphics/libs/libkexiv2/libkexiv2/kexiv2image.cpp#482 As you can see in this code the order is : Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized Exif.Image.DateTime Xmp.exif.DateTimeOriginal Xmp.exif.DateTimeDigitized Xmp.photoshop.DateCreated Xmp.xmp.CreateDate Xmp.tiff.DateTime Xmp.xmp.ModifyDate Xmp.xmp.MetadataDate Iptc.Application2.DateCreated Iptc.Application2.DigitizationDate Gilles Caulier 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: > I just started working with digiKam (again) and have tried both v1.4.0 > and v1.5.0 (from the philip5 ppa) in Kubuntu Maverick and neither > version's calendar view seems to be working off of the EXIF date. > When I select, for example, 2010 -> October I get a bunch of images > from this month but also some that have creation and modification > dates this month but EXIF dates from various other times. The > documentation states that: > > "digiKam uses either the EXIF date or, if no EXIF date is available, > the last modification time of the file." > http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/using-kapp.html#using-mydatesview > > but that is not what I am observing. A screenshot is available at: > > http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view.png > > In that shot you can see the calendar view selection (October 2010), > the modification and creation dates (October 25, 2010), and the EXIF > date (December 23, 2007). > > Is there any option for this now or does the documentation need to be > updated? Thanks for the great software and any help you can offer on > this matter. > > Cheers, > -kyle > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Hi Gilles,
Thanks for the quick reply. I clicked the 'Full list' button for this screenshot: http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view_full_exif.png All three EXIF dates appear to be present and the same (December 23, 2007). Cheers, -kyle On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 13:19, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: > In Exif view of this image, turn on full tags list and look other date > information. Use tags filters if necessary. > > This is the order of Exif/Xmp/IPTC tags used to fill date timestamp in > digiKam database : > > http://lxr.kde.org/source/KDE/kdegraphics/libs/libkexiv2/libkexiv2/kexiv2image.cpp#482 > > As you can see in this code the order is : > > Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal > Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized > Exif.Image.DateTime > Xmp.exif.DateTimeOriginal > Xmp.exif.DateTimeDigitized > Xmp.photoshop.DateCreated > Xmp.xmp.CreateDate > Xmp.tiff.DateTime > Xmp.xmp.ModifyDate > Xmp.xmp.MetadataDate > Iptc.Application2.DateCreated > Iptc.Application2.DigitizationDate > > Gilles Caulier > > 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >> I just started working with digiKam (again) and have tried both v1.4.0 >> and v1.5.0 (from the philip5 ppa) in Kubuntu Maverick and neither >> version's calendar view seems to be working off of the EXIF date. >> When I select, for example, 2010 -> October I get a bunch of images >> from this month but also some that have creation and modification >> dates this month but EXIF dates from various other times. The >> documentation states that: >> >> "digiKam uses either the EXIF date or, if no EXIF date is available, >> the last modification time of the file." >> http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/using-kapp.html#using-mydatesview >> >> but that is not what I am observing. A screenshot is available at: >> >> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view.png >> >> In that shot you can see the calendar view selection (October 2010), >> the modification and creation dates (October 25, 2010), and the EXIF >> date (December 23, 2007). >> >> Is there any option for this now or does the documentation need to be >> updated? Thanks for the great software and any help you can offer on >> this matter. >> >> Cheers, >> -kyle >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
And what's the file timestamp ? Go to properties tab from right sidebar
Gilles Caulier 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: > Hi Gilles, > > Thanks for the quick reply. I clicked the 'Full list' button for this > screenshot: > > http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view_full_exif.png > > All three EXIF dates appear to be present and the same (December 23, 2007). > > Cheers, > -kyle > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 13:19, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: >> In Exif view of this image, turn on full tags list and look other date >> information. Use tags filters if necessary. >> >> This is the order of Exif/Xmp/IPTC tags used to fill date timestamp in >> digiKam database : >> >> http://lxr.kde.org/source/KDE/kdegraphics/libs/libkexiv2/libkexiv2/kexiv2image.cpp#482 >> >> As you can see in this code the order is : >> >> Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal >> Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized >> Exif.Image.DateTime >> Xmp.exif.DateTimeOriginal >> Xmp.exif.DateTimeDigitized >> Xmp.photoshop.DateCreated >> Xmp.xmp.CreateDate >> Xmp.tiff.DateTime >> Xmp.xmp.ModifyDate >> Xmp.xmp.MetadataDate >> Iptc.Application2.DateCreated >> Iptc.Application2.DigitizationDate >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >>> I just started working with digiKam (again) and have tried both v1.4.0 >>> and v1.5.0 (from the philip5 ppa) in Kubuntu Maverick and neither >>> version's calendar view seems to be working off of the EXIF date. >>> When I select, for example, 2010 -> October I get a bunch of images >>> from this month but also some that have creation and modification >>> dates this month but EXIF dates from various other times. The >>> documentation states that: >>> >>> "digiKam uses either the EXIF date or, if no EXIF date is available, >>> the last modification time of the file." >>> http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/using-kapp.html#using-mydatesview >>> >>> but that is not what I am observing. A screenshot is available at: >>> >>> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view.png >>> >>> In that shot you can see the calendar view selection (October 2010), >>> the modification and creation dates (October 25, 2010), and the EXIF >>> date (December 23, 2007). >>> >>> Is there any option for this now or does the documentation need to be >>> updated? Thanks for the great software and any help you can offer on >>> this matter. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -kyle >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Screenshot:
http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view_properties.png Creation and modification times are both listed as October 25, 2010 under the thumbnail as is the date in the properties view. In case it's useful the original image is available at: http://fstab.net/digikam/DSCI0682.JPG There are other images acting similarly, I have just selected this one as a particular example. digiKam may have been open when the images were copied (outside of digiKam) to this computer on the 25th. Cheers, -kyle On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 14:41, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: > And what's the file timestamp ? Go to properties tab from right sidebar > > Gilles Caulier > > 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >> Hi Gilles, >> >> Thanks for the quick reply. I clicked the 'Full list' button for this >> screenshot: >> >> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view_full_exif.png >> >> All three EXIF dates appear to be present and the same (December 23, 2007). >> >> Cheers, >> -kyle >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 13:19, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> In Exif view of this image, turn on full tags list and look other date >>> information. Use tags filters if necessary. >>> >>> This is the order of Exif/Xmp/IPTC tags used to fill date timestamp in >>> digiKam database : >>> >>> http://lxr.kde.org/source/KDE/kdegraphics/libs/libkexiv2/libkexiv2/kexiv2image.cpp#482 >>> >>> As you can see in this code the order is : >>> >>> Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal >>> Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized >>> Exif.Image.DateTime >>> Xmp.exif.DateTimeOriginal >>> Xmp.exif.DateTimeDigitized >>> Xmp.photoshop.DateCreated >>> Xmp.xmp.CreateDate >>> Xmp.tiff.DateTime >>> Xmp.xmp.ModifyDate >>> Xmp.xmp.MetadataDate >>> Iptc.Application2.DateCreated >>> Iptc.Application2.DigitizationDate >>> >>> Gilles Caulier >>> >>> 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >>>> I just started working with digiKam (again) and have tried both v1.4.0 >>>> and v1.5.0 (from the philip5 ppa) in Kubuntu Maverick and neither >>>> version's calendar view seems to be working off of the EXIF date. >>>> When I select, for example, 2010 -> October I get a bunch of images >>>> from this month but also some that have creation and modification >>>> dates this month but EXIF dates from various other times. The >>>> documentation states that: >>>> >>>> "digiKam uses either the EXIF date or, if no EXIF date is available, >>>> the last modification time of the file." >>>> http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/using-kapp.html#using-mydatesview >>>> >>>> but that is not what I am observing. A screenshot is available at: >>>> >>>> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view.png >>>> >>>> In that shot you can see the calendar view selection (October 2010), >>>> the modification and creation dates (October 25, 2010), and the EXIF >>>> date (December 23, 2007). >>>> >>>> Is there any option for this now or does the documentation need to be >>>> updated? Thanks for the great software and any help you can offer on >>>> this matter. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> -kyle >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Look like your image is imported properly in my collection :
http://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/5118954880/sizes/o/in/photostream/ The creation date is right... Gilles Caulier 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: > Screenshot: > http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view_properties.png > > Creation and modification times are both listed as October 25, 2010 > under the thumbnail as is the date in the properties view. In case > it's useful the original image is available at: > > http://fstab.net/digikam/DSCI0682.JPG > > There are other images acting similarly, I have just selected this one > as a particular example. digiKam may have been open when the images > were copied (outside of digiKam) to this computer on the 25th. > > Cheers, > -kyle > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 14:41, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: >> And what's the file timestamp ? Go to properties tab from right sidebar >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >>> Hi Gilles, >>> >>> Thanks for the quick reply. I clicked the 'Full list' button for this >>> screenshot: >>> >>> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view_full_exif.png >>> >>> All three EXIF dates appear to be present and the same (December 23, 2007). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -kyle >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 13:19, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> In Exif view of this image, turn on full tags list and look other date >>>> information. Use tags filters if necessary. >>>> >>>> This is the order of Exif/Xmp/IPTC tags used to fill date timestamp in >>>> digiKam database : >>>> >>>> http://lxr.kde.org/source/KDE/kdegraphics/libs/libkexiv2/libkexiv2/kexiv2image.cpp#482 >>>> >>>> As you can see in this code the order is : >>>> >>>> Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal >>>> Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized >>>> Exif.Image.DateTime >>>> Xmp.exif.DateTimeOriginal >>>> Xmp.exif.DateTimeDigitized >>>> Xmp.photoshop.DateCreated >>>> Xmp.xmp.CreateDate >>>> Xmp.tiff.DateTime >>>> Xmp.xmp.ModifyDate >>>> Xmp.xmp.MetadataDate >>>> Iptc.Application2.DateCreated >>>> Iptc.Application2.DigitizationDate >>>> >>>> Gilles Caulier >>>> >>>> 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >>>>> I just started working with digiKam (again) and have tried both v1.4.0 >>>>> and v1.5.0 (from the philip5 ppa) in Kubuntu Maverick and neither >>>>> version's calendar view seems to be working off of the EXIF date. >>>>> When I select, for example, 2010 -> October I get a bunch of images >>>>> from this month but also some that have creation and modification >>>>> dates this month but EXIF dates from various other times. The >>>>> documentation states that: >>>>> >>>>> "digiKam uses either the EXIF date or, if no EXIF date is available, >>>>> the last modification time of the file." >>>>> http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/using-kapp.html#using-mydatesview >>>>> >>>>> but that is not what I am observing. A screenshot is available at: >>>>> >>>>> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view.png >>>>> >>>>> In that shot you can see the calendar view selection (October 2010), >>>>> the modification and creation dates (October 25, 2010), and the EXIF >>>>> date (December 23, 2007). >>>>> >>>>> Is there any option for this now or does the documentation need to be >>>>> updated? Thanks for the great software and any help you can offer on >>>>> this matter. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> -kyle >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
I guess it's likely an import bug then? I figure I'll write metadata
to all files, remove all collections, and then add back the collections... unless there's a better way to give digiKam a chance to reprocess the dates and resolve this? And then in the future I should always have digiKam closed when copying files (not using digiKam) into catalogue directories? Thanks again, -kyle On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 17:25, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: > Look like your image is imported properly in my collection : > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/5118954880/sizes/o/in/photostream/ > > The creation date is right... > > Gilles Caulier > > 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >> Screenshot: >> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view_properties.png >> >> Creation and modification times are both listed as October 25, 2010 >> under the thumbnail as is the date in the properties view. In case >> it's useful the original image is available at: >> >> http://fstab.net/digikam/DSCI0682.JPG >> >> There are other images acting similarly, I have just selected this one >> as a particular example. digiKam may have been open when the images >> were copied (outside of digiKam) to this computer on the 25th. >> >> Cheers, >> -kyle >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 14:41, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> And what's the file timestamp ? Go to properties tab from right sidebar >>> >>> Gilles Caulier >>> >>> 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >>>> Hi Gilles, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the quick reply. I clicked the 'Full list' button for this >>>> screenshot: >>>> >>>> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view_full_exif.png >>>> >>>> All three EXIF dates appear to be present and the same (December 23, 2007). >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> -kyle >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 13:19, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> In Exif view of this image, turn on full tags list and look other date >>>>> information. Use tags filters if necessary. >>>>> >>>>> This is the order of Exif/Xmp/IPTC tags used to fill date timestamp in >>>>> digiKam database : >>>>> >>>>> http://lxr.kde.org/source/KDE/kdegraphics/libs/libkexiv2/libkexiv2/kexiv2image.cpp#482 >>>>> >>>>> As you can see in this code the order is : >>>>> >>>>> Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal >>>>> Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized >>>>> Exif.Image.DateTime >>>>> Xmp.exif.DateTimeOriginal >>>>> Xmp.exif.DateTimeDigitized >>>>> Xmp.photoshop.DateCreated >>>>> Xmp.xmp.CreateDate >>>>> Xmp.tiff.DateTime >>>>> Xmp.xmp.ModifyDate >>>>> Xmp.xmp.MetadataDate >>>>> Iptc.Application2.DateCreated >>>>> Iptc.Application2.DigitizationDate >>>>> >>>>> Gilles Caulier >>>>> >>>>> 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >>>>>> I just started working with digiKam (again) and have tried both v1.4.0 >>>>>> and v1.5.0 (from the philip5 ppa) in Kubuntu Maverick and neither >>>>>> version's calendar view seems to be working off of the EXIF date. >>>>>> When I select, for example, 2010 -> October I get a bunch of images >>>>>> from this month but also some that have creation and modification >>>>>> dates this month but EXIF dates from various other times. The >>>>>> documentation states that: >>>>>> >>>>>> "digiKam uses either the EXIF date or, if no EXIF date is available, >>>>>> the last modification time of the file." >>>>>> http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/using-kapp.html#using-mydatesview >>>>>> >>>>>> but that is not what I am observing. A screenshot is available at: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view.png >>>>>> >>>>>> In that shot you can see the calendar view selection (October 2010), >>>>>> the modification and creation dates (October 25, 2010), and the EXIF >>>>>> date (December 23, 2007). >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there any option for this now or does the documentation need to be >>>>>> updated? Thanks for the great software and any help you can offer on >>>>>> this matter. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> -kyle >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
2010/10/27 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>:
> I guess it's likely an import bug then? I figure I'll write metadata > to all files, remove all collections, and then add back the > collections... unless there's a better way to give digiKam a chance > to reprocess the dates and resolve this? Just try this : - stop digiKam. - from a file manager as dolphin create a new album. - edit the famous image into showfoto and crop it - save the image in the new album with a new name. - start digiKam and look the result into this new album. digiKam is able to recognize the image data to parse first bytes of file and compare it with other image fingerprint. renaming the image to a new album is not enough. database will recognize it as duplicate. croping the image will change image fingerprint. an old bug > And then in the future I > should always have digiKam closed when copying files (not using > digiKam) into catalogue directories? > no. I never do it here, with my huge image collection. Something is wrong with your database (probably an old bug) Create a new account and try to rescan your collection to create a new database. Look if date are better. Do not use the current database file of course. Gilles Caulier > Thanks again, > -kyle > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 17:25, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Look like your image is imported properly in my collection : >> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/5118954880/sizes/o/in/photostream/ >> >> The creation date is right... >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >>> Screenshot: >>> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view_properties.png >>> >>> Creation and modification times are both listed as October 25, 2010 >>> under the thumbnail as is the date in the properties view. In case >>> it's useful the original image is available at: >>> >>> http://fstab.net/digikam/DSCI0682.JPG >>> >>> There are other images acting similarly, I have just selected this one >>> as a particular example. digiKam may have been open when the images >>> were copied (outside of digiKam) to this computer on the 25th. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -kyle >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 14:41, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> And what's the file timestamp ? Go to properties tab from right sidebar >>>> >>>> Gilles Caulier >>>> >>>> 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >>>>> Hi Gilles, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the quick reply. I clicked the 'Full list' button for this >>>>> screenshot: >>>>> >>>>> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view_full_exif.png >>>>> >>>>> All three EXIF dates appear to be present and the same (December 23, 2007). >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> -kyle >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 13:19, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>> In Exif view of this image, turn on full tags list and look other date >>>>>> information. Use tags filters if necessary. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is the order of Exif/Xmp/IPTC tags used to fill date timestamp in >>>>>> digiKam database : >>>>>> >>>>>> http://lxr.kde.org/source/KDE/kdegraphics/libs/libkexiv2/libkexiv2/kexiv2image.cpp#482 >>>>>> >>>>>> As you can see in this code the order is : >>>>>> >>>>>> Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal >>>>>> Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized >>>>>> Exif.Image.DateTime >>>>>> Xmp.exif.DateTimeOriginal >>>>>> Xmp.exif.DateTimeDigitized >>>>>> Xmp.photoshop.DateCreated >>>>>> Xmp.xmp.CreateDate >>>>>> Xmp.tiff.DateTime >>>>>> Xmp.xmp.ModifyDate >>>>>> Xmp.xmp.MetadataDate >>>>>> Iptc.Application2.DateCreated >>>>>> Iptc.Application2.DigitizationDate >>>>>> >>>>>> Gilles Caulier >>>>>> >>>>>> 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >>>>>>> I just started working with digiKam (again) and have tried both v1.4.0 >>>>>>> and v1.5.0 (from the philip5 ppa) in Kubuntu Maverick and neither >>>>>>> version's calendar view seems to be working off of the EXIF date. >>>>>>> When I select, for example, 2010 -> October I get a bunch of images >>>>>>> from this month but also some that have creation and modification >>>>>>> dates this month but EXIF dates from various other times. The >>>>>>> documentation states that: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "digiKam uses either the EXIF date or, if no EXIF date is available, >>>>>>> the last modification time of the file." >>>>>>> http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/using-kapp.html#using-mydatesview >>>>>>> >>>>>>> but that is not what I am observing. A screenshot is available at: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view.png >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In that shot you can see the calendar view selection (October 2010), >>>>>>> the modification and creation dates (October 25, 2010), and the EXIF >>>>>>> date (December 23, 2007). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there any option for this now or does the documentation need to be >>>>>>> updated? Thanks for the great software and any help you can offer on >>>>>>> this matter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> -kyle >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Unfortunately I had already written the metadata to the images (but
not the other stuff) without waiting for your wiser response... this ended up writing the incorrect date into two of the three EXIF fields leaving only the digitization date uncorrupted. This happened to a few other images as well. I re-copied the files with digiKam closed to recover the time stamps and then reread their metadata into digiKam. At this point I assume that I have destroyed the scenario you were helping me explore and debug. :[ Maybe next time I won't jump ahead. I can't check all 15k images but things seem better now. A separate issue, before I re-copied the files I went to manually undo the date changes and noticed that the edit EXIF window doesn't have any provision for editing the seconds field for any of the three dates. The same applies for IPTC and XMP as well. In the EXIF window, despite not having access to seconds the checkboxes and fields are present for sub-second resolution. As to the broken database and old bug... I created this database fresh with v1.4.0. Should I be concerned about other troubles in the database that I haven't noticed? Thanks for trying to help and sorry I screwed it up, -kyle On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 02:44, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: > 2010/10/27 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >> I guess it's likely an import bug then? I figure I'll write metadata >> to all files, remove all collections, and then add back the >> collections... unless there's a better way to give digiKam a chance >> to reprocess the dates and resolve this? > > Just try this : > > - stop digiKam. > - from a file manager as dolphin create a new album. > - edit the famous image into showfoto and crop it > - save the image in the new album with a new name. > - start digiKam and look the result into this new album. > > digiKam is able to recognize the image data to parse first bytes of > file and compare it with other image fingerprint. > > renaming the image to a new album is not enough. database will > recognize it as duplicate. croping the image will change image > fingerprint. > an old bug > >> And then in the future I >> should always have digiKam closed when copying files (not using >> digiKam) into catalogue directories? >> > > no. I never do it here, with my huge image collection. Something is > wrong with your database (probably an old bug) > > Create a new account and try to rescan your collection to create a new > database. Look if date are better. Do not use the current database > file of course. > > Gilles Caulier > >> Thanks again, >> -kyle >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 17:25, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Look like your image is imported properly in my collection : >>> >>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/5118954880/sizes/o/in/photostream/ >>> >>> The creation date is right... >>> >>> Gilles Caulier >>> >>> 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >>>> Screenshot: >>>> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view_properties.png >>>> >>>> Creation and modification times are both listed as October 25, 2010 >>>> under the thumbnail as is the date in the properties view. In case >>>> it's useful the original image is available at: >>>> >>>> http://fstab.net/digikam/DSCI0682.JPG >>>> >>>> There are other images acting similarly, I have just selected this one >>>> as a particular example. digiKam may have been open when the images >>>> were copied (outside of digiKam) to this computer on the 25th. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> -kyle >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 14:41, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> And what's the file timestamp ? Go to properties tab from right sidebar >>>>> >>>>> Gilles Caulier >>>>> >>>>> 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >>>>>> Hi Gilles, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the quick reply. I clicked the 'Full list' button for this >>>>>> screenshot: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view_full_exif.png >>>>>> >>>>>> All three EXIF dates appear to be present and the same (December 23, 2007). >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> -kyle >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 13:19, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>>>> In Exif view of this image, turn on full tags list and look other date >>>>>>> information. Use tags filters if necessary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is the order of Exif/Xmp/IPTC tags used to fill date timestamp in >>>>>>> digiKam database : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://lxr.kde.org/source/KDE/kdegraphics/libs/libkexiv2/libkexiv2/kexiv2image.cpp#482 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As you can see in this code the order is : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal >>>>>>> Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized >>>>>>> Exif.Image.DateTime >>>>>>> Xmp.exif.DateTimeOriginal >>>>>>> Xmp.exif.DateTimeDigitized >>>>>>> Xmp.photoshop.DateCreated >>>>>>> Xmp.xmp.CreateDate >>>>>>> Xmp.tiff.DateTime >>>>>>> Xmp.xmp.ModifyDate >>>>>>> Xmp.xmp.MetadataDate >>>>>>> Iptc.Application2.DateCreated >>>>>>> Iptc.Application2.DigitizationDate >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gilles Caulier >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2010/10/26 Kyle Altendorf <[hidden email]>: >>>>>>>> I just started working with digiKam (again) and have tried both v1.4.0 >>>>>>>> and v1.5.0 (from the philip5 ppa) in Kubuntu Maverick and neither >>>>>>>> version's calendar view seems to be working off of the EXIF date. >>>>>>>> When I select, for example, 2010 -> October I get a bunch of images >>>>>>>> from this month but also some that have creation and modification >>>>>>>> dates this month but EXIF dates from various other times. The >>>>>>>> documentation states that: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "digiKam uses either the EXIF date or, if no EXIF date is available, >>>>>>>> the last modification time of the file." >>>>>>>> http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/using-kapp.html#using-mydatesview >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> but that is not what I am observing. A screenshot is available at: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://fstab.net/digikam/digiKam_calendar_view.png >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In that shot you can see the calendar view selection (October 2010), >>>>>>>> the modification and creation dates (October 25, 2010), and the EXIF >>>>>>>> date (December 23, 2007). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there any option for this now or does the documentation need to be >>>>>>>> updated? Thanks for the great software and any help you can offer on >>>>>>>> this matter. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> -kyle >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>>> [hidden email] >>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>>> [hidden email] >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Digikam-users mailing list >>>> [hidden email] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Digikam-users mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |