CR2 to JPG
Locked
 
|
Hello, I tried something with digikam without success I thought it is simple but I failed to find the solution So I am here to ask you some advice... Unfortunately I took some pictures in CR2 format. It was a mistake And now I want to get the images in JPG. But I am not interested by a sophisticated method for RAW processing. As the CR2 images look like a charm directly in Digikam album viewer, so I think it should be a simple way to convert them in JPEG. Do you know how can i do it ? Sebastien _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Sebastien,
1. Select the photos you want converted in the main window. 2. Click on the 'Batch Queue Manager' - you should see the selected photos in the left panel 3. In the control panel select "Convert to JPEG" 4. Select any other adjustment required then RUN Batch Queue (top left button) On 28/11/14 08:46, [hidden email] wrote: > Hello, > > I tried something with digikam without success > I thought it is simple but I failed to find the solution > So I am here to ask you some advice... > > I use Digikam 2.5 with a Canon 100D. > Unfortunately I took some pictures in CR2 format. > It was a mistake > And now I want to get the images in JPG. > But I am not interested by a sophisticated method for RAW processing. > As the CR2 images look like a charm directly in Digikam album viewer, so > I think it should be a simple way to convert them in JPEG. > Do you know how can i do it ? > > Thank you in advance for your help. > > Sebastien > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > -- Cheers Simon Simon Cropper - Open Content Creator Free and Open Source Software Workflow Guides ------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction http://www.fossworkflowguides.com GIS Packages http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/gis bash / Python http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/scripting _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Dear Simon, Thank for this tip. It generates a JPEG file but unfortunately the image looks like pink filter, the colors are altered and are not good like I can see in Digikam preview. More details : The CR2 image looks good in Digikam album viewer The CR2 image looks bad (too pink) in Image Editor And the JPEG image generated by your solution looks like in Image Editor. Thank you, S De: "Simon Cropper" <[hidden email]> À: [hidden email] Envoyé: Jeudi 27 Novembre 2014 23:09:28 Objet: Re: [Digikam-users] CR2 to JPG 2. Click on the 'Batch Queue Manager' - you should see the selected photos in the left panel 3. In the control panel select "Convert to JPEG" 4. Select any other adjustment required then RUN Batch Queue (top left button) On 28/11/14 08:46, [hidden email] wrote: > Hello, > > I tried something with digikam without success > I thought it is simple but I failed to find the solution > So I am here to ask you some advice... > > I use Digikam 2.5 with a Canon 100D. > Unfortunately I took some pictures in CR2 format. > It was a mistake > And now I want to get the images in JPG. > But I am not interested by a sophisticated method for RAW processing. > As the CR2 images look like a charm directly in Digikam album viewer, so > I think it should be a simple way to convert them in JPEG. > Do you know how can i do it ? > > Thank you in advance for your help. > > Sebastien > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > Cheers Simon ------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction http://www.fossworkflowguides.com GIS Packages http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/gis bash / Python http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/scripting _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Sebastien,
If you look at this post... http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1009934.html ... it suggests the was encountered a few years back and was fixed. I have checked the raw conversion program (DCRAW) and it supports your camera. I can then only presume that you are using out of date software or software using older versions of the RAW libraries (i.e. prior to your camera being supported by the LibRAW/DCRAW libraries). Look at the LibRAW version (Help > Components Information), it should be 0.15.4 and Digikam should be 4.5.0 or something similar. If you have older versions you will need to upgrade to at least a version that supports your camera. On 28/11/14 09:22, [hidden email] wrote: > Dear Simon, > > Thank for this tip. > It generates a JPEG file but unfortunately the image looks like pink > filter, the colors are altered and are not good like I can see in > Digikam preview. > > More details : > The CR2 image looks good in Digikam album viewer > The CR2 image looks bad (too pink) in Image Editor > And the JPEG image generated by your solution looks like in Image Editor. > > Thank you, > > S > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *De: *"Simon Cropper" <[hidden email]> > *À: *[hidden email] > *Envoyé: *Jeudi 27 Novembre 2014 23:09:28 > *Objet: *Re: [Digikam-users] CR2 to JPG > > Sebastien, > > 1. Select the photos you want converted in the main window. > 2. Click on the 'Batch Queue Manager' - you should see the selected > photos in the left panel > 3. In the control panel select "Convert to JPEG" > 4. Select any other adjustment required then RUN Batch Queue (top left > button) > > > On 28/11/14 08:46, [hidden email] wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I tried something with digikam without success > > I thought it is simple but I failed to find the solution > > So I am here to ask you some advice... > > > > I use Digikam 2.5 with a Canon 100D. > > Unfortunately I took some pictures in CR2 format. > > It was a mistake > > And now I want to get the images in JPG. > > But I am not interested by a sophisticated method for RAW processing. > > As the CR2 images look like a charm directly in Digikam album viewer, so > > I think it should be a simple way to convert them in JPEG. > > Do you know how can i do it ? > > > > Thank you in advance for your help. > > > > Sebastien > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Digikam-users mailing list > > [hidden email] > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > > -- > Cheers Simon > > Simon Cropper - Open Content Creator > > Free and Open Source Software Workflow Guides > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Introduction http://www.fossworkflowguides.com > GIS Packages http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/gis > bash / Python http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/scripting > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users > _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
Simon,
Thank you for your answer. Yes your are true, it seems that libraw supports the canon 100D since the 0.15.0 revision (released may 2013 http://www.libraw.org/news/libraw-0-15-0) And I use the outdated ubuntu 12.04... I will try to install the updated libraw to fix this issue. Thank you for your support. Sebastien Le 27/11/2014 23:51, Simon Cropper a écrit : > Sebastien, > > If you look at this post... > > http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1009934.html > > ... it suggests the was encountered a few years back and was fixed. > > I have checked the raw conversion program (DCRAW) and it supports your > camera. I can then only presume that you are using out of date > software or software using older versions of the RAW libraries (i.e. > prior to your camera being supported by the LibRAW/DCRAW libraries). > > Look at the LibRAW version (Help > Components Information), it should > be 0.15.4 and Digikam should be 4.5.0 or something similar. If you > have older versions you will need to upgrade to at least a version > that supports your camera. > > On 28/11/14 09:22, [hidden email] wrote: >> Dear Simon, >> >> Thank for this tip. >> It generates a JPEG file but unfortunately the image looks like pink >> filter, the colors are altered and are not good like I can see in >> Digikam preview. >> >> More details : >> The CR2 image looks good in Digikam album viewer >> The CR2 image looks bad (too pink) in Image Editor >> And the JPEG image generated by your solution looks like in Image >> Editor. >> >> Thank you, >> >> S >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *De: *"Simon Cropper" <[hidden email]> >> *À: *[hidden email] >> *Envoyé: *Jeudi 27 Novembre 2014 23:09:28 >> *Objet: *Re: [Digikam-users] CR2 to JPG >> >> Sebastien, >> >> 1. Select the photos you want converted in the main window. >> 2. Click on the 'Batch Queue Manager' - you should see the selected >> photos in the left panel >> 3. In the control panel select "Convert to JPEG" >> 4. Select any other adjustment required then RUN Batch Queue (top left >> button) >> >> >> On 28/11/14 08:46, [hidden email] wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I tried something with digikam without success >> > I thought it is simple but I failed to find the solution >> > So I am here to ask you some advice... >> > >> > I use Digikam 2.5 with a Canon 100D. >> > Unfortunately I took some pictures in CR2 format. >> > It was a mistake >> > And now I want to get the images in JPG. >> > But I am not interested by a sophisticated method for RAW processing. >> > As the CR2 images look like a charm directly in Digikam album >> viewer, so >> > I think it should be a simple way to convert them in JPEG. >> > Do you know how can i do it ? >> > >> > Thank you in advance for your help. >> > >> > Sebastien >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Digikam-users mailing list >> > [hidden email] >> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > >> >> -- >> Cheers Simon >> >> Simon Cropper - Open Content Creator >> >> Free and Open Source Software Workflow Guides >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> Introduction http://www.fossworkflowguides.com >> GIS Packages http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/gis >> bash / Python http://www.fossworkflowguides.com/scripting >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Digikam-users mailing list >> [hidden email] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > Digikam-users mailing list > [hidden email] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
You can't just update libraw to make it work with digikam. You also need to rebuild libkdcraw against it and then rebuild digikam against them both... /PhilipOn Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Sébastien Vallet <[hidden email]> wrote: Simon, _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 18:22:57 +0100
Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]> wrote: > You can't just update libraw to make it work with digikam. You also need to > rebuild libkdcraw against it and then rebuild digikam against them both... Puzzling. If libraw has the same API and functions and libkdcraw is a wrapper then surely it should simply pass calls to the underlying libraw.so shouldn't it? -- Brian Morrison "I am not young enough to know everything" Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
2014-11-28 21:41 GMT+01:00 Brian Morrison <[hidden email]>:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 18:22:57 +0100 > Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> You can't just update libraw to make it work with digikam. You also need to >> rebuild libkdcraw against it and then rebuild digikam against them both... > > Puzzling. > > If libraw has the same API and functions and libkdcraw is a wrapper then > surely it should simply pass calls to the underlying libraw.so > shouldn't it? it must. but don't forget the ABI (not API). The binary compatibility is not always respected. At least libraw + libkdcraw must be recompiled. digiKam don't know libraw ABI so it can be not necessary to recompile it after libkdcraw. Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 22:43:47 +0100
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: > 2014-11-28 21:41 GMT+01:00 Brian Morrison <[hidden email]>: > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 18:22:57 +0100 > > Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> You can't just update libraw to make it work with digikam. You also need to > >> rebuild libkdcraw against it and then rebuild digikam against them both... > > > > Puzzling. > > > > If libraw has the same API and functions and libkdcraw is a wrapper then > > surely it should simply pass calls to the underlying libraw.so > > shouldn't it? > > it must. but don't forget the ABI (not API). Yes, I knew what I wanted to type but put the wrong thing. > The binary compatibility is not always respected. I would expect it to be, but maybe some people haven't had the Linus treatment about such things. > > At least libraw + libkdcraw must be recompiled. digiKam don't know > libraw ABI so it can be not necessary to recompile it after libkdcraw. Makes sense, so really it's only libkdcraw that makes the difference. That's part of KDE rather than digiKam right? -- Brian Morrison "I am not young enough to know everything" Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
|
|
2014-11-29 0:34 GMT+01:00 Brian Morrison <[hidden email]>:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 22:43:47 +0100 > Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> 2014-11-28 21:41 GMT+01:00 Brian Morrison <[hidden email]>: >> > On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 18:22:57 +0100 >> > Philip Johnsson <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > >> >> You can't just update libraw to make it work with digikam. You also need to >> >> rebuild libkdcraw against it and then rebuild digikam against them both... >> > >> > Puzzling. >> > >> > If libraw has the same API and functions and libkdcraw is a wrapper then >> > surely it should simply pass calls to the underlying libraw.so >> > shouldn't it? >> >> it must. but don't forget the ABI (not API). > > Yes, I knew what I wanted to type but put the wrong thing. > >> The binary compatibility is not always respected. > > I would expect it to be, but maybe some people haven't had the Linus > treatment about such things. > >> >> At least libraw + libkdcraw must be recompiled. digiKam don't know >> libraw ABI so it can be not necessary to recompile it after libkdcraw. > > Makes sense, so really it's only libkdcraw that makes the difference. > That's part of KDE rather than digiKam right? yes. libkdcraw is released through kdegraphics, but it maintained by... digiKam team, as we have written fully this KDE/Qt interface to libraw. It's used by Gwenview, Kphotoalbum and other part of KDE/Qt applications. Gilles Caulier _______________________________________________ Digikam-users mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users |
«
Return to digikam-users
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |