------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96894
arnd.baecker web de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #21695|0 |1
is obsolete| |
Attachment #21698|0 |1
is obsolete| |
------- Additional Comments From arnd.baecker web de 2007-09-27 11:15 -------
Created an attachment (id=21701)
--> (
http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=21701&action=view)
also allow goto tag
Mikolaj, thanks a lot for testing!
1/ Of course you are right! Still I think that "Go to" would be even better.
OK?
(Actually the same in the menu below: "Open With" -> "Open with")
2/ I had a look at it, implemented apart from one problem,
see my technical question below.
(However, I think adding a submenu is technically simpler, well,
let's first get the functionality working)
3/ I tried a couple of cases, but it seems to work fine here.
So presumably I am using a different ordering.
Could you describe a sequence in which this happens
(Actually, I was about to ask, what is the "strange place",
i.e. a different folder or a wrong image, but then your previous
message arrived.)
Hmm, so this needs further debugging find out a reproducible
scheme for this issue...
However, what I do observe is that when going to a Date view,
there is an empty entry in the history for the Back/Forward
entries. Note that this also happens without the patch.
I.e., this is a different bug ;-).
I also just realized, that goto was even possible when more
than one item is selected. In this case I disable the goto menu. OK?
Now the technical question for Gilles concerning /2:
I use TagsPopupMenu::REMOVE for this purpose:
TagsPopupMenu* gotoTagsPopup = new TagsPopupMenu(selectedImageIDs, 1000,
TagsPopupMenu::REMOVE);
int gotoTagId = gotoMenu.insertItem(i18n("Tag"), gotoTagsPopup);
connect(gotoTagsPopup, SIGNAL(signalTagActivated(int)),
this, SLOT(slotGotoTag(int)));
In the new routine
void AlbumIconView::slotGotoTag(int tagID)
I would like to
emit signalGotoTagAndItem(tagID, iconItem);
but I don't have the iconItem at hand.
Is there a simple way to pass the iconItem through via the connect?
Another important point:
In slotGotoTag I need the
void selectItem(int id);
from tagfolderview.cpp, however it is defined in protected.
Is it ok to move it into public, or
should a different approach be used?
(It seems to work though ...;-)
Thanks, Arnd
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
Locked
