Package: digikam
Version: 0.10.0~beta2-1 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** When ubgrading from 0.9.4-1 to 0.10.0~beta2-1 with aptitude I got a conflict between libkipi0 and libkipi5, aptitude refused to install the new digikam package. Could it be, that the libkipi0 dependency is wrong for version 0.10.0~beta2-1? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Your message dated Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:09:18 +1100 with message-id <[hidden email]> and subject line Re: Bug#497522: digikam: probably wrong dependency on libkipi0 has caused the Debian Bug report #497522, regarding digikam: probably wrong dependency on libkipi0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [hidden email] immediately.) -- 497522: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497522 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [hidden email] with problems Package: digikam Version: 0.10.0~beta2-1 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** When ubgrading from 0.9.4-1 to 0.10.0~beta2-1 with aptitude I got a conflict between libkipi0 and libkipi5, aptitude refused to install the new digikam package. Could it be, that the libkipi0 dependency is wrong for version 0.10.0~beta2-1? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash On Tuesday 02 September 2008 20:39:42 Matthias Weiss wrote: > When ubgrading from 0.9.4-1 to 0.10.0~beta2-1 with aptitude I got a > conflict between libkipi0 and libkipi5, aptitude refused to install the new > digikam package. > Could it be, that the libkipi0 dependency is wrong for version > 0.10.0~beta2-1? Matthias, 0.10.0~beta2 doesn't depend on libkipi0: http://packages.debian.org/experimental/digikam When I try to upgrade with aptitude it correctly removes libkipi0: # aptitude install digikam/experimental Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Writing extended state information... Done Reading task descriptions... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: libkipi5{a} The following packages will be REMOVED: libacl1-dev{u} libart-2.0-dev{u} libarts1-dev{u} libaspell-dev{u} libattr1- dev{u} libavahi-qt3-dev{u} libbz2-dev{u} libfam-dev{u} libgpod-common{u} libilmbase-dev{u} libjack-dev{u} libjack0.100.0-dev{u} libkcal2b{u} libkdcraw3{u} libkdepim1a{u} libkexiv2-3{u} libkipi0{a} libktnef1{u} liblua50-dev{u} liblualib50-dev{u} libmad0-dev{u} libopenexr-dev{u} libpcre3-dev{u} libpcrecpp0{u} libsgutils1{u} libxslt1-dev{u} lua50{u} sg3-utils{u} The following packages will be upgraded: digikam 1 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 28 to remove and 3 not upgraded. Need to get 9352kB of archives. After unpacking 21.7MB will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] Mark _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |