https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
Bug ID: 306092 Severity: normal Version: 2.6.0 Priority: NOR Assignee: [hidden email] Summary: creation date as file name - doesn't work in BQM Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux Reporter: [hidden email] Hardware: Ubuntu Packages Status: UNCONFIRMED Component: Batch Queue Manager Product: digikam I want to use the creation date/time as a unique filename (under the assumption, that I use _one_ camera) When selecting a file for BQM, I find some options referrimng to time, date etc. which I'd like to use for this purpose. BQM offers a selection box to define batches, and especially modify file names. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. When selection Metadata > DateTimeOriginal, I expect that digiKam (DK) transfer this metadata into the filname. 2. Starting BQM produces an empty placeholder- the desired filename would _not_ be modified as desired. 3. Expected Results: I like to extract the creation date + time (YYMMDD_HHMMSS) to use this as a file name DSC_1234.jpg (or *.NEF) >> 120403_090523.jpg (or *.NEF) Important issue for large pic collection (screenshots follow) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
--- Comment #1 from Axel Krebs <[hidden email]> --- Created attachment 73579 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=73579&action=edit Metadata- selection of DateTimeOriginal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
--- Comment #2 from Axel Krebs <[hidden email]> --- Created attachment 73580 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=73580&action=edit whereas showing "user-defined file names" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #3 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- This feature used advanced renamed tool (implementation is shared). It's reproducible used rename tool available in icon-view ? Try also in Import Tool with your camera, this option is also available. It's reproducible ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
--- Comment #4 from Axel Krebs <[hidden email]> --- Thank for information concerning the mentioned tool. > It's reproducible used rename tool available in icon-view ? Don't understand this sentence completely: 1.) My observation is reproducible- I tried several times. 2.) Why should BQM relate to "icon-view"? >> Can you detail, please? I never used import tool, as it is the same effort to load pics from SD-cards as using an micro-usb-cable for pic imports. Besides: why should I check for import tools, when I have issues within renaming in BQM? For safety reasons, I always work step-by-step: - import, - adding tags, - selecting pics for BQM, - doing some sequential work therein. What can I help? Axel Am 31.08.2012 19:24, schrieb Gilles Caulier: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092 > > Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |[hidden email] > > --- Comment #3 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- > This feature used advanced renamed tool (implementation is shared). > > It's reproducible used rename tool available in icon-view ? > > Try also in Import Tool with your camera, this option is also available. It's > reproducible ? > > Gilles Caulier > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
--- Comment #5 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- The problem still reproducible with last 2.9.0 stable release ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
--- Comment #6 from Axel Krebs <[hidden email]> --- Am 21.12.2012 12:51, schrieb Gilles Caulier: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092 > > --- Comment #5 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- > The problem still reproducible with last 2.9.0 stable release ? > > Gilles Caulier > Am 21.12.2012 12:24, schrieb Gilles Caulier: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285237 > > --- Comment #11 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- > What about this entry. It still valid with last stable 2.9.0 ? > > Gilles Caulier > Hi: right now, I use DK 2.8; newer DK versions are not accessible yet, for me. Axel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #7 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Andi, Can you reproduce the problem with advanced rename feature in BQM ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
--- Comment #8 from Andi Clemens <[hidden email]> --- Yes, but this is no AdvancedRename or BQM bug, this Exif Information doesn't seem to exist in the file. Most of my images don't have this metadata set... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
--- Comment #9 from Andi Clemens <[hidden email]> --- Have you tried the "Date & Time" options? They should give you the creation time... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #10 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Axel, Following comment #8 and #9 from Andi, this is not a digiKam issue. Your files do not include meta information relevant of date to complete renaming. If you use way from #9, this must fix your problem. I just tried it on my computer. Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
--- Comment #11 from Andi Clemens <[hidden email]> --- If this value should be set per default, it could be an exiv2 issue... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
--- Comment #12 from Andi Clemens <[hidden email]> --- These EXIF values work with most of my images: [meta:Exif.Image.DateTime] [meta:Exif.Photo.DateTimeDigitized] [meta:Exif.Photo.DateTimeOriginal] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
--- Comment #13 from Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]> --- Current status as per MWG: * Original Date/Time – Creation date of the intellectual content (e.g. the photograph), rather than the creation date of the content being shown Exif DateTimeOriginal (36867, 0x9003) and SubSecTimeOriginal (37521, 0x9291) IPTC DateCreated (IIM 2:55, 0x0237) and TimeCreated (IIM 2:60, 0x023C) XMP (photoshop:DateCreated) (+ an XMP Exif key) * Digitized Date/Time – Creation date of the digital representation Exif DateTimeDigitized (36868, 0x9004) and SubSecTimeDigitized (37522, 0x9292) IPTC DigitalCreationDate (IIM 2:62, 0x023E) and DigitalCreationTime (IIM 2:63, 0x023F) XMP (xmp:CreateDate) (+ an XMP Exif key) * Modification Date/Time – Modification date of the digital image file Exif DateTime (306, 0x132) and SubSecTime (37520, 0x9290) XMP (xmp:ModifyDate) We are missing libkexiv2 methods cleanly separating these 3 different fields, but most of this is supported for reading and writing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
--- Comment #14 from Andi Clemens <[hidden email]> --- It could be read by the rename tokens I mentioned above, though... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Axel Krebs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306092
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|BatchQueueManager |BatchQueueManager-Tool-Time | |Adjust -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |