|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303419
Bug ID: 303419 Severity: normal Version: 2.8.0 Priority: NOR Assignee: [hidden email] Summary: No images shown Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux Reporter: [hidden email] Hardware: openSUSE RPMs Status: UNCONFIRMED Component: Albums GUI Product: digikam I updated DIgikam from 2.6 since this keeps crashing on close. Now no images were shown in the album tree and the number is 0. Despite that the database is connected properly and the statistics says there're images. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install Digikam 2.6 from http://software.opensuse.org/package/digikam 2. Imported pictures via mount -t cifs 3. Updated to 2.7 as stated in the link under #1 but get 2.8 Actual Results: No images shown, album image number is 0 Expected Results: Thumnsnails shown and album image numbers as images in the folder -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303419
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |[hidden email] Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- It's a broken binary compatibilty. Do not mix version on your computer. Check your system... Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by mikeg
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303419
--- Comment #2 from Mike Gutzschhahn <[hidden email]> --- Hi, I've tried to solve it by checking and updating dependencies without success. Deinstalled completly through yast and reinstalled without any effort. What is your suggested solution? Thank you for your support. Am 12.07.2012 um 18:23 schrieb Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]>: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303419 > > Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED > CC| |[hidden email] > Resolution|--- |INVALID > > --- Comment #1 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- > It's a broken binary compatibilty. Do not mix version on your computer. > > Check your system... > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by mikeg
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303419
--- Comment #3 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- yes, cleanup your system : libkipi, libkexiv2, libkgeomap, libkface, libkdcraw, etc... Gilles -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by mikeg
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303419
--- Comment #4 from Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]> --- This is the typical problem with ioslaves (leftover old ioslaves, binary incompatible etc.) and thus with packaging and/or installation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by mikeg
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303419
Mike Gutzschhahn <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Mike Gutzschhahn <[hidden email]> --- Got it solved with a clean install and Digikam 2.7. Anyway using a smb network share gave me a lot of trouble. How do you do it with smb? Fusesmb, what i used in the first place, used up the whole RAM (+ 8000 files cached). With "mount -t cifs //[SERVER]/[FOLDER] -o username=[USER],password=[PASS] /[LOCAL DIR]" the RAM keeps free and the performance is ok. But that gave me read rights only. At the end i'm using a local dir or usb drive with a local database. My initial thought to use a shared remote DB and networt share i quit after spending a lot of hours. But this is another story … -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by mikeg
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303419
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version Fixed In| |2.8.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
