https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
Summary: Watermark size original/unchanged/pixels/points Product: digikam Version: 2.5.0 Platform: Gentoo Packages OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: [hidden email] ReportedBy: [hidden email] Version: 2.5.0 (using KDE 4.7.4) OS: Linux I would like to be able to set the Batch Queue Manager to create a watermark: 1- using a font size in pixels or points, 2- or when using a PNG, to have the PNG untouched, its original size. Reproducible: Always Expected Results: 1- px and pt font size 2- original PNG dimension -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] Component|general |Batch Queue Manager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by DrSlony-3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Watermark size |BQM Watermark tool : size |original/unchanged/pixels/p |original/unchanged/pixels/p |oints |oints -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by DrSlony-3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
DrSlony <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] Version|2.5.0 |4.2.0 --- Comment #1 from DrSlony <[hidden email]> --- Still valid in 4.2.0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by DrSlony-3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|BatchQueueManager |BatchQueueManager-Tool-Inse | |rtText -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by DrSlony-3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
Ahmed Fathi <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ahmed.fathi.abdelmageed@gma | |il.com --- Comment #2 from Ahmed Fathi <[hidden email]> --- Created attachment 103721 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=103721&action=edit absolute fonts and images I created a patch for this problem. now you have a new checkbox called "use absolute size". if you check the box , the size percentage slider is disabled for both image and text watermarks. furthermore , in the text mode , when you activate this checkbox , A column of font sizes to choose from gets enabled , otherwise it is disabled. Note : This patch assumes the user knows what he is doing. so if the user selects a font size so large that the water mark text typed is beyond the image boundaries , no automatic scaling is done. As it is assumed that if the user wants automatic scaling, he would have used the size slider instead -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by DrSlony-3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
--- Comment #3 from DrSlony <[hidden email]> --- Sounds good. I don't compile my own digiKam so I won't be able to test until its released. Scaling should absolutely not be done if setting font size manually, otherwise it would be misleading. Why "a column of font sizes"? A spin box would be ideal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by DrSlony-3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
--- Comment #4 from Ahmed Fathi <[hidden email]> --- Created attachment 103722 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=103722&action=edit Photo To indicate current look It is to be said that I modified the way the user chooses text in another bugzilla entry to enable different font styles and the current configuration is just like the photo I am uploading here, just without the rightmost size column. So I thought a size column would be bette in this configuration . I thought adding this column is better looking than just a spin box or text box , as the (vertical) space is already occupied by the other two columns for font and style. What do you think ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by DrSlony-3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
--- Comment #5 from [hidden email] --- Ahmed, Do you add a tooltip to checkbox to explain to end user the option effect ? DrSlony, The other bugzilla entry that Ahmed said in comment #4 is bug #339460. Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by DrSlony-3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
--- Comment #6 from DrSlony <[hidden email]> --- @Ahmed that looks good. The "Size" column includes a spin button, so it's all good. @Caulier well I haven't been able to test this yet, but Ahmed's description sounds simple enough, so there's probably no need for a tooltip. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by DrSlony-3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Latest Commit| |https://commits.kde.org/dig | |ikam/f9121cd5122be78cb01714 | |19b150634f9b215791 Version Fixed In| |5.5.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from [hidden email] --- Git commit f9121cd5122be78cb0171419b150634f9b215791 by Gilles Caulier. Committed on 31/01/2017 at 08:15. Pushed by cgilles into branch 'master'. apply patch #103721 from Ahmed Fathi to use absolute fonts with images. FIXED-IN: 5.5.0 M +2 -1 NEWS M +74 -35 utilities/queuemanager/tools/decorate/watermark.cpp M +2 -1 utilities/queuemanager/tools/decorate/watermark.h https://commits.kde.org/digikam/f9121cd5122be78cb0171419b150634f9b215791 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by DrSlony-3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
--- Comment #8 from [hidden email] --- DrSlony, I applied the patch. This evening, i will rebuild the AppImage 5.5.0 to test and available at usual place from GDrive repository. Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by DrSlony-3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
--- Comment #9 from Ahmed Fathi <[hidden email]> --- @Guilles It is a little late but I yes made a "what's this" discription for the checkbox for help @DrSlony yes it is all good thank you :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by DrSlony-3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
--- Comment #10 from [hidden email] --- DrSlony, The new pre-version of 64 bits AppImage bundle 5.5.0 will be uploaded to GDrive in few minutes, including the last patch committed in this report. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YOFkqIcoopQGZVWa3wioKz5Ue22Mi68dLYsG_YB2XSo/edit?usp=sharing You can test with it. Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by DrSlony-3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291110
--- Comment #11 from [hidden email] --- Youps sorry wrong url. right one : https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |