https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #19 from Francesco Riosa <francesco+kde pnpitalia it> 2011-09-11 21:44:38 --- One more note: Since old database settings are not deleted, just copyed and splitted; users which didn't changed database settings in the meantime should be safe. Looking at the users messages and screenshots in digikam-users there are various degrees of tainting, seem that different distro used different commits for the 2.1.0 snapshot (at least one must have my full patch) those that cannot start the first time after upgrade but that can work after the second launch for example have the full patch. Anyway I'll definitely wait more time to commit after a tag the next releases. Nicolas, just to be sure, please none of my commits should slip into 2.1.1. If some of the files is positive to the 'tmb[A-Z]' pattern, then it's tainted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #20 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2011-09-12 07:38:46 --- Just to be clear : If 2.1.1 release must be done, it safe to use current git master to do it ? Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #21 from Francesco Riosa <francesco+kde pnpitalia it> 2011-09-12 09:27:04 --- (In reply to comment #20) > Just to be clear : > > If 2.1.1 release must be done, it safe to use current git master to do it ? > > Gilles Caulier No, we should revert, see also bug 281838, there are only two commit for splitted DB, one is mine, the other is from Marcel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #22 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2011-09-12 09:31:07 --- Francesco, So, what's the last commit ID to include in 2.1.1 tarball ? Gilles -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #23 from Francesco Riosa <francesco+kde pnpitalia it> 2011-09-12 10:09:21 --- git clone -l ../digikam-sc/core/ git checkout v2.1.0 which give the exact tagged 2.1.0 version is fine for me, there are other changes in released tarballs, I cannot speak for those. P.S. the link at c#17 is obviously a cut&paste error, it should be http://dev.gentoo.org/~dilfridge/distfiles/digikam-2.1.0-tag.patch.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #24 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2011-09-12 10:11:33 --- Thanks Francesco, I sent a private mail in French to Nicolas (at Mandriva) about this entry. I hope that he will take a look soon... Gilles -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #25 from Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge gentoo org> 2011-09-12 12:38:37 --- (In reply to comment #23) > git checkout v2.1.0 (...) > http://dev.gentoo.org/~dilfridge/distfiles/digikam-2.1.0-tag.patch.bz2 ^ that's more or less just what I did to make the patch, yes. (I checked out the tag v2.1.0 of digikam.git, replaced the core directory in the tarball with the checkout, and then diffed against the original tarball.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #26 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2011-09-12 14:42:00 --- I just recieve a response from Nicolas. He will rebuild tarball using 2.1.0 tag. Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #27 from <kripton kripserver net> 2011-09-12 15:50:56 --- Hi, I'm a Gentoo-user that has digikam-2.1.0-r1 installed right now. I use a MySQL-database and I remember that I ran the version once and did not have any problems. Nevertheless I do not want to try again just for the sake of knowing it exactly. What shall I do now? Unmerge and emerge the new version? Will my database work with 2.1.0-r2? Is there a Gentoo bug# for this problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #28 from Francesco Riosa <francesco+kde pnpitalia it> 2011-09-12 16:32:55 --- (In reply to comment #27) > Hi, I'm a Gentoo-user that has digikam-2.1.0-r1 installed right now. I use a > MySQL-database and I remember that I ran the version once and did not have any > problems. Nevertheless I do not want to try again just for the sake of knowing > it exactly. > What shall I do now? Unmerge and emerge the new version? Will my database work > with 2.1.0-r2? Is there a Gentoo bug# for this problem? Hi, 1st) to be on the safe side, please dump your databases with mysqldump 2nd) edit ~/.kde4/share/config/digikamrc, the section [Database Settings] should contain only the following: [Database Settings] Database Connectoptions= Database Hostname= Database Name=digikam Database Name Thumbnails=digikam Database Password=digikam Database Port=0 Database Type=QMYSQL Database Username=digikam no Image* or Thumbnails*, if these are present remove them also check that values in there are correct. 3rd) additionally if using different databases for "Database Name" and "Database Name Thumbnails" please consider merging the two in only one. There are know bugs that will be fixed in 2.2.0 when using mysql and differrent databases. 4th) emerge -C =digikam-2.1.0-r1 && emerge -a =digikam-2.1.0-r2 I'm installing digikam-2.1.0-r1 right now for an in depth look, will report here if other steps are required -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #29 from <kripton kripserver net> 2011-09-12 17:14:23 --- Thanks for the information. Database has been dumped while writing #27 here. Since I have the thumbnails and the other infos all in one database I'm confident there won't be much trouble. However, I won't do anything until tomorrow when the situation has been cleared up further. Thanks for all you work :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #30 from Francesco Riosa <francesco+kde pnpitalia it> 2011-09-12 18:14:29 --- Steps in Comment #28 are confirmed and sufficient and - no data loss is involved - small addition to 2rd): "Internal Database Server=false" should be kept (it's re-created but to be safe keep it) and explanation: those settings will be used in future versions of digikam, if they are unset then DK will read the old settings and migrate to new config. If instead the settings are present it will simply plain using it, then if the "old" settings have been changed by an "old" version of DK the changes will be lost, not inside the database, but DK will start a different database than the most recent one. "old" digikam mean version < 2.2.0 with exclusion of 2.1.0-r1 (or whatever 2.1.0 your distro provided) explanation for 3rd) is @ bug #277242 P.S. Possibly there is a thumbnails db tainting your image db but should do no harm if not on the database size. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #31 from Nicolas L. <neoclust kde free fr> 2011-09-14 07:59:42 --- Hello, Please test this tarball ( http://kenobi.mandriva.com/~neoclust/digikam-2.1.1.tar.bz2 ) and tell me if it works OK. If OK i will upload it on sourceforge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #32 from Rinus Bakker <sleeplessregulus hetnet nl> 2011-09-14 08:28:26 --- Message read, I report back within 48 hours at max. Op 14-09-11 09:59, Nicolas L. schreef: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767 > > > > > > --- Comment #31 from Nicolas L.<neoclust kde free fr> 2011-09-14 07:59:42 --- > Hello, > > Please test this tarball ( > http://kenobi.mandriva.com/~neoclust/digikam-2.1.1.tar.bz2 ) and tell me if > it works OK. > > If OK i will upload it on sourceforge. > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
Will Stephenson <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #33 from Will Stephenson <wstephenson kde org> 2011-09-14 09:00:17 --- Is the tarball mentioned in comment 31 still current? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #34 from Francesco Riosa <francesco+kde pnpitalia it> 2011-09-14 09:21:10 --- work for me on gentoo diff digikam-2.1.0-r1.ebuild digikam-2.1.1.ebuild 26c26 < KEYWORDS="" --- > KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86" 41,42c41,42 < >=media-libs/libkface-${PV} < >=media-libs/libkgeomap-${PV} --- > >=media-libs/libkface-2.1.0 > >=media-libs/libkgeomap-2.1.0 cosmetical, for the next time, we should ignore the following files: find . -name "*~" ./.gitslave~ ./core/CMakeLists.txt~ ./extra/kipi-plugins/CMakeLists.txt~ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #35 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2011-09-14 09:24:55 --- @ Will #33 : it will become the new one, to fix older 2.1.0 Please compile, test, and report... Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #36 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2011-09-14 09:59:30 --- @Nicolas, #31 : tarball compile fine here... Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Anders Lund
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767
--- Comment #37 from Andrea Scarpino <andrea archlinux org> 2011-09-14 10:17:36 --- Works here on Arch Linux. +1 for release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from neoclust.kde@free.fr
Can anyone tell me hoe to get the thing to download.https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281767 --- Comment #31 from Nicolas L. <neoclust kde free fr> 2011-09-14 07:59:42 --- Hello, Please test this tarball ( http://kenobi.mandriva.com/~neoclust/digikam-2.1.1.tar.bz2 ) and tell me if it works OK. If OK i will upload it on sourceforge. Access forbidden!You don't have permission to access the requested object. It is either read-protected or not readable by the server. If you think this is a server error, please contact the [hidden email]. Error 403kenobi.mandriva.comApache/2.2.15 (Mandriva Linux/PREFORK-3.3mdv2010.2) Rinus _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |