|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #20 from Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer gmail com> 2011-09-02 12:03:04 --- I'll check asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #21 from Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer gmail com> 2011-09-02 22:51:24 --- Still no KDE update, so I still need to wait. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #22 from Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer gmail com> 2011-12-09 20:19:42 --- I recompiled digikam 1.9.0 against libkexiv2 4.7.2. But this time I noticed it depends on libexiv libexiv2-9 (0.20-2.1). I'll try recompiling agains a newer libexiv. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #23 from Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer gmail com> 2011-12-09 20:38:32 --- Tested against libexiv 0.21.1, same behaviour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #24 from Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer gmail com> 2011-12-09 20:52:42 --- Tested against libexiv 0.22, the bug is still there :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #25 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2011-12-09 21:51:52 --- Ok, now, it's time to test with digiKam 2.x release. 2.3 is out since one month. 2.4, since few days... Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #26 from Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer gmail com> 2011-12-10 15:32:44 --- Tested with 2.3, the bug is still there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #27 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Official digiKam 2.6.0 release is out since few days now : http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/656 Please, check if this entry still valid, or update report accordingly. Thanks in advance. Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #28 from Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <[hidden email]> --- This bug is still valid. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #29 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Lisandro, I still cannot reproduce your problem in my computer. Here i use 3.0.0-RC. Can you try again with last 2.9.0 stable release please ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #30 from Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <[hidden email]> --- (In reply to comment #29) > Lisandro, > > I still cannot reproduce your problem in my computer. Here i use 3.0.0-RC. > > Can you try again with last 2.9.0 stable release please ? Debian is freezed and I only have 2.6.0 at hand. I'm currently busy fixing RC bugs to make the release, I may be able to compile 2.9.0 at some point on January. Lisandro. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #31 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Lisandro, This file still valid using last digiKam 4.2.0 ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #32 from Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <[hidden email]> --- Yes, but now I think it's half a bug, half a feature. Since not so long the ¿exif? properties of the original images say something like "JPEG (old compression method" while the processed files don't. So I *guess* the problem is that the compression format is changed when the files are being processed, thus reducing the size of the images. While it's a feature if the data is not lost, it's a bug to do so without asking. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #33 from Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <[hidden email]> --- Forget my last comment: the bug is still there but both files have "old style jpeg compression" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #34 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- And you have tested with 4.2.0 ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #35 from Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <[hidden email]> --- Mm, sorry, indeed I tested with 4.1.0. Will test with 4.2.0 as soon as is lands in unstable. Once again, sorry for that :-/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|1.9.0 |4.1.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|After running a batch |After running a batch |process for setting tags, |process to change metadata, |the files halved in size. |the files halved in size. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
--- Comment #36 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Maik, your last changes in BQM solve this issue ? Gilles -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from perezmeyer@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277024
Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #37 from Maik Qualmann <[hidden email]> --- Gilles, Yes. For example, the JPEG compression of the queue to the value can be set, which is also used otherwise for storing the images. Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
