https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275078
Summary: fit to window size not working if image is smaller then window size Product: digikam Version: 2.0.0 Platform: Ubuntu Packages OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: Preview AssignedTo: [hidden email] ReportedBy: [hidden email] Version: 2.0.0 (using KDE 4.6.2) OS: Linux DigiKam 2.0.0 beta6 My setup is german, so actual english names of things might differ from my translations. If I use View--> fit to window size, images stay at or revert to their original size, effectively doing the same as View --> show original size. same with a keyboard shortcut. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: using View --> fit to window size (or appropriate shortcut) on an image that's not at it's original size. Actual Results: Sets image to original size. Expected Results: Fit image to window size. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275078
--- Comment #1 from Marcel Wiesweg <marcel wiesweg gmx de> 2011-06-19 16:15:08 --- For me this is WONTFIX because intended: Fit-to-window is for the usual case of large images. With small images, like icons, zooming in automatically is often not desired, if the image is really small you'll having nothing but a zoom artifact. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Andreas T. Ege
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275078
--- Comment #2 from AT <andreas spheniscid net> 2011-06-19 20:34:37 --- As DigiKam doesn't actually automatically zoom in (at least it didn't before 2.0), it would be still up to the individual user if he wants to blow the image up to fullscreen. I find it fairly usefull to see if an image that's not quite as big as my screen still looks nice, especially in fullscreen mode. And the old behaviour just was faster then using then + key at times. At least the name should be changed then, because 'fit image to window size' conveys the message it's increasing the image if it is smaller then the window, or reduce it if it's bigger. And it shouldn't reset an image zoomed to window size back to it's original size either in my opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Andreas T. Ege
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275078
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|fit to window size not |Fit to window size not |working if image is smaller |working if image is smaller |then window size |then window size CC| |[hidden email] --- Comment #3 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- AT, This problem still valid using digiKam 4.2.0 ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Andreas T. Ege
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275078
--- Comment #4 from AT <[hidden email]> --- Behaviour is unchanged - images smaller then the window stay small, or if they had been zoomed, they revert to their original size. If I interpret Marcel's comment correctly, this behaviour is supposed to be a feature. And by looking at this bug report I'm probably the only one missing the old behaviour. :-P ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Andreas T. Ege
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275078
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|2.0.0 |4.2.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Andreas T. Ege
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275078
--- Comment #5 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- At, What's about this file using digiKam 4.10.0 ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Andreas T. Ege
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275078
--- Comment #6 from [hidden email] --- This file still valid using last digiKam 5.0.0 ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Andreas T. Ege
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275078
--- Comment #7 from [hidden email] --- Can you reproduce the problem using digiKam Linux AppImage bundle ? The last bundle is available at this url: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by Andreas T. Ege
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275078
--- Comment #8 from AT <[hidden email]> --- Hi there, sorry I didn't pick up on the last comments. Kind of missed them though I'm sure I must have read the mail notification. Yes, behaviour is unchanged with digikam-5.4.0-01-x86-64.appimage (dito with digikam-5.3 on sabayon). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
In reply to this post by Andreas T. Ege
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275078
[hidden email] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|4.2.0 |5.4.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |