https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
Summary: Fuji S3 Pro Raw files (RAF) only S pixels are processed giving 6MP Should be S+R Pixels giving 12MP Product: digikam Version: 1.5.0 Platform: Fedora RPMs OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: [hidden email] ReportedBy: [hidden email] Version: 1.5.0 (using KDE 4.5.3) OS: Linux Importing from Fuji S3Pro raw files (likely from all fuji super ccd cameras) gives a 6mp image in digikam - it uses only the S pixels of the sensor. Using Libkdcraw 1.1.0 Digikam 1.5.0 on KDE 4.5.3 on Fedora 13 This should be corrected to use the S + R pixels Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Convert a fuji s3 pro raf file and view the result in the editor Actual Results: image size given as 3030 x 2036 6.17mp which gives a tiff file size of 35.4 mb Using only the S pixels limits the tonal quality and range of the finished picture. Ultra important! Expected Results: image size should be 4281 x 2871 12.29mp giving a tiff file size of 70.3 mp If it is helpful, Raw Therapee 2.4.1 handles these files correctly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[hidden email], | |[hidden email] Component|general |libkdcraw --- Comment #1 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2010-11-23 22:18:20 --- Peter, Go to Help/Components Info and copy/paste the contents here. We are looking which libkdcraw/libraw you use with digiKam. Also, we need RAW file samples to test. Alex, I CC you for info. Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #2 from Alex Tutubalin <lexa lexa ru> 2010-11-24 06:19:31 --- LibRaw is able to extract both shots from Fuji RAW without problems. Use params.shot_select=0 for first frame and params.shot_select=1 for second one. There is no code whith mix two shots together right, it should be done on postprocessing stage. AFAIK, only two software with right two-frames mixing exists: Fuji RAW file converter Raw Photo Processor (Mac Only) We (LibRaw team) are open to coperation and ready to accept patches/code which do right frame mixing for fuji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #3 from Peter <peter fotoworks gmail com> 2010-11-24 14:46:45 --- Hi Alex, I don't know the raw conversion software you mention in you email. I did use to use s7raw for my fuji raw conversion in the days when I used MS Windows. S7raw still shows up on Google searches but I have not tried it for a long time. For several years now I have used and recommend Raw Therapee http://www.rawtherapee.com/ - I think this is now under GPL license. (I am only a user of the software, no other connection) I would love to create a patch or some code for Digikam but I have no relevant skills, I am just a photographer I am afraid Best regards Peter Rodgers www.fotoworks.eu 01483 285572 0778 709 7229 On 24 November 2010 05:19, Alex Tutubalin <[hidden email]> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737 > > > > > > --- Comment #2 from Alex Tutubalin <lexa lexa ru> 2010-11-24 06:19:31 --- > LibRaw is able to extract both shots from Fuji RAW without problems. > Use params.shot_select=0 for first frame and params.shot_select=1 for > second > one. > > There is no code whith mix two shots together right, it should be done on > postprocessing stage. > > AFAIK, only two software with right two-frames mixing exists: > Fuji RAW file converter > Raw Photo Processor (Mac Only) > > We (LibRaw team) are open to coperation and ready to accept patches/code > which > do right frame mixing for fuji. > > -- > Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug. > -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #4 from Peter <peter fotoworks gmail com> 2010-11-24 15:28:46 --- Hi Gilles, I have put 3 FujiS3Pro raw files in a zip file on Rapidshare for use on digikam, please feel free - they were bounced by the bugs.kde.org server. http://rapidshare.com/files/432840858/PR_Fuji_Raw_files.zip I hope this helps In short, when use Raw therapee http://www.rawtherapee.com/ on these files I get a correct 16bit tiff of 75mb, when I use digikam I get a 16 bit tiff of 35mb - only half. My Best regards Peter Rodgers www.fotoworks.eu 01483 285572 0778 709 7229 On 23 November 2010 21:18, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737 > > > Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |[hidden email], > | |[hidden email] > Component|general |libkdcraw > > > > > --- Comment #1 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2010-11-23 > 22:18:20 --- > Peter, > > Go to Help/Components Info and copy/paste the contents here. We are looking > which libkdcraw/libraw you use with digiKam. > > Also, we need RAW file samples to test. > > Alex, I CC you for info. > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug. > -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #5 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2011-11-03 12:24:03 --- Peter, It still valid to use last digiKam version with last libkdcraw ? Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #6 from Peter Rodgers <peter rodgers fotoworks eu> 2011-11-05 05:13:43 --- On 3 November 2011 12:24, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737 > > > > > > --- Comment #5 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> Â 2011-11-03 12:24:03 --- > Peter, > > It still valid to use last digiKam version with last libkdcraw ? > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug. > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #7 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2011-11-05 07:42:48 --- Hi Gilles, Thank you for your email - I have just processed one of my Fuji S3Pro Raf files in Digikam 2.1.1 using libraw 0.13.5 on Xubuntu 11.10 I must say I do like the added functionality in Raw processing. The thumbnail browser Properties reports that the file is 3,584x3583 (12.84Mpx) When I import it in into the editor: Properties show 3,584x3583 (12.84Mpx) information bar on bottom of screen shows 3,030x2036 (6.17Mpx) The saved Tiff file is 35.4mb I processed the same file in Raw Therapee 3.0.0.6 and it saves a Tiff of 70.3mb - this is what I would expect. I hope this helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #8 from Alex Tutubalin <lexa lexa ru> 2011-11-05 08:00:28 --- Please note, that S3Pro files have 2:1 aspect ratio, not usual 1:1 The RAW data size (single pixel set) is 4352:1440 (i.e. 3:1 after removing masked pixels: 64 pixels in X direction and 4 pixels in Y), while output is 3:2 So, there are two possible ways to scale the image 1) Scale Y direction 2x, so result will become 4300x2880 (~12Mpix) 2) Scale Y 1.4x and scale X ~0.7x, so result will become 3030x2036 (as LibRaw does) The first method is way too optimistic: the low-sensitivity pixels are 3 stop less sensitive, so midtones are way underexposed for this pixel set. As a result, low sensitivity part of sensor will be unable to add much for mid-tones resolution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #9 from Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]> --- Alex, reading your comment as non-expert for RAWs: Do we have a bug somewhere or not? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #10 from Alex Tutubalin <[hidden email]> --- See comment #2 After extracting two shots from RAF file, you need some software to stitch these frames together. AFAIK, digiKam have no code to do it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #11 from Marcel Wiesweg <[hidden email]> --- Well apparently we need some code to do this, and someone who understands the problem to write this code -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #12 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Alex, Which this mix S+R fuji data is not shared in libraw instead to make a dedicated implementation in digiKam (libkdcraw in fact) ? We will certainly not only the single project interested by this feature Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #13 from Alex Tutubalin <[hidden email]> --- Gilles, because no one has wrote this piece of code and contribute it to LibRaw. Our (LibRaw team) position is simple 1) we will improve raw reading/unpacking code 2) we're open for patches, contributions, improvements and so on for postprocessing code (dcraw_process()) 3) Currently we have no plans to develop postprocessing code ourselves. For Fuji: LibRaw 0.15 will contain 'prefetch' mode, i.e. raw data for several frames will be prefetched by LibRaw, so one will be able to change shot_select=... without re-opening the file. Schedule is still unknown, we're busy with our 'RawDigger' software (www.rawdigger.org) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #14 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- Peter, Do you tried to decode Fuji raw files with last digiKam 4.2.0 ? This problem still valid ? Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #15 from Peter <[hidden email]> --- Dear Giles, Sorry to say the problem is still exists. I processed and saved the same Raw file in Digikam 4.2.0 and Raw Therapee 4.1.0 on my Sabayon system. Digikam reports the file as 3030 x 2036 (6.17mpx) saved to 16 bit uncompressed tiff is 35.4Mb Raw Therapee reports the file as 4281 x2871 (12.3mp) saved to 16 bit uncompressed tiff is 70.4Mb My best regards Peter Rodgers www.fotoworks.eu 01483 285572 0778 709 7229 On 5 September 2014 21:59, Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737 > > --- Comment #14 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> --- > Peter, > > Do you tried to decode Fuji raw files with last digiKam 4.2.0 ? This problem > still valid ? > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|1.5.0 |4.2.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #16 from Alex Tutubalin <[hidden email]> --- Nothing changed from my comment #13. If someone will contribute code to process R+S pixels, I'll be happy to include it into LibRaw. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #17 from [hidden email] --- Git commit d0a60f5f02890de9e5a5a3e312511930f3cf72a5 by Gilles Caulier. Committed on 28/07/2016 at 13:54. Pushed by cgilles into branch 'master'. Update internal Libraw to 0.18.0 beta (July 2016). Move Libraw samples compilation rules to core/tests/rawengine. Theses samples files are now only generated if test code are compiled through right CMake option. Use DNG SDK source code to compile Libraw in goal to: - Decode DNG analog color balances - Decode DNG channel black/white level - 8-bit encoded DNG files - Deflate compressed DNG support with zlib New features: - Support for Black and White Jpeg previews - Better intepolation of low-sensitivity pixels on Sigma Quattro files New RAW cameras supported: - BlackMagic Micro Cinema Camera, URSA Mini - Canon 80D, 1300D, 1DX MkII - Fujifilm X-Pro2 (uncompressed RAW only), X70, X-E2S - HTC One A9 and M9 - Leica M (Typ 262) and X-U (Typ 113) - Nikon D5 - Olympus Pen F, SH-3 - Panasonic DMC-GX80/85, DMC-TZ80/81/85/ZS60, DMC-TZ100/101/ZS100 - PhaseOne IQ150, IQ180 IR, IQ3 (all models) - Samsung Galaxy S7 (SM-G935F) - Sony ILCA-68, ILCE-6300, RX1R II, RX10 III - YUNEEC CGO4 Related: bug 347010, bug 328321, bug 366095 M +12 -0 NEWS M +32 -28 libs/rawengine/libraw/CMakeLists.txt M +5 -1 libs/rawengine/libraw/COPYRIGHT M +104 -0 libs/rawengine/libraw/Changelog.txt M +1 -1 libs/rawengine/libraw/crlf2lf.sh M +1752 -413 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/dcraw_common.cpp M +2 -2 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/dcraw_fileio.cpp M +10 -6 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/defines.h M +2 -2 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/demosaic_packs.cpp D +0 -142 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/libraw_bytebuffer.h M +12 -2 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/libraw_internal_funcs.h M +29 -29 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/libraw_x3f.cpp M +1 -1 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/var_defines.h M +98 -98 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/wf_filtering.cpp M +43 -22 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw.h M +3 -3 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw_alloc.h M +89 -24 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw_const.h M +61 -2 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw_datastream.h M +19 -14 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw_internal.h M +360 -166 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw_types.h M +4 -4 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw_version.h M +8 -8 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/4channels.cpp M +46 -43 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/dcraw_emu.cpp M +1 -1 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/dcraw_half.c M +1 -1 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/half_mt.c M +1 -1 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/half_mt_win32.c M +9 -9 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/mem_image.cpp M +6 -6 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/multirender_test.cpp M +23 -23 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/postprocessing_benchmark.cpp M +192 -11 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/raw-identify.cpp M +10 -10 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/simple_dcraw.cpp M +9 -9 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/unprocessed_raw.cpp M +11 -3 libs/rawengine/libraw/src/libraw_c_api.cpp M +1150 -167 libs/rawengine/libraw/src/libraw_cxx.cpp M +86 -85 libs/rawengine/libraw/src/libraw_datastream.cpp M +43 -0 tests/rawengine/CMakeLists.txt http://commits.kde.org/digikam/d0a60f5f02890de9e5a5a3e312511930f3cf72a5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from peter.fotoworks@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257737
--- Comment #18 from [hidden email] --- Git commit 2c67e6ffd23d8e7fda2704e875378b7f2da20905 by Gilles Caulier. Committed on 01/11/2016 at 17:00. Pushed by cgilles into branch 'master'. Internal Libraw updated to 0.18-beta1 with 78 cameras added, floating point DNG support, decode exotic DNG formats e.g. 8-bit DNG, and more metadata parsed while decoding as white balance presets, DNG colordata, vendor specific metadata. See Libraw announcement for details : http://www.libraw.org/news/libraw-0-18-beta1 Related: bug 368862, bug 367640, bug 328321, bug 347010 FIXED-IN: 5.3.0 M +5 -0 NEWS M +1 -5 libs/rawengine/libraw/COPYRIGHT M +230 -235 libs/rawengine/libraw/Changelog.txt M +0 -0 libs/rawengine/libraw/LICENSE.CDDL M +0 -0 libs/rawengine/libraw/LICENSE.LGPL M +4 -5 libs/rawengine/libraw/README A +34 -0 libs/rawengine/libraw/README.DNGSDK.txt M +1 -4 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/aahd_demosaic.cpp M +1682 -1038 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/dcraw_common.cpp M +1 -4 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/dcraw_fileio.cpp M +3 -6 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/defines.h M +1 -10 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/demosaic_packs.cpp M +1 -4 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/dht_demosaic.cpp M +16 -6 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/libraw_internal_funcs.h M +1080 -551 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/libraw_x3f.cpp M +1 -3 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/var_defines.h M +1 -10 libs/rawengine/libraw/internal/wf_filtering.cpp M +29 -21 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw.h M +1 -4 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw_alloc.h M +10 -32 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw_const.h M +5 -8 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw_datastream.h M +2 -6 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw_internal.h M +67 -28 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw_types.h M +3 -6 libs/rawengine/libraw/libraw/libraw_version.h M +1 -5 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/4channels.cpp M +51 -10 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/dcraw_emu.cpp M +1 -5 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/dcraw_half.c M +1 -4 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/half_mt.c M +1 -4 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/half_mt_win32.c M +1 -4 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/mem_image.cpp M +1 -5 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/multirender_test.cpp M +1 -6 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/postprocessing_benchmark.cpp M +124 -20 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/raw-identify.cpp M +16 -5 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/simple_dcraw.cpp M +2 -5 libs/rawengine/libraw/samples/unprocessed_raw.cpp M +38 -3 libs/rawengine/libraw/src/libraw_c_api.cpp M +458 -100 libs/rawengine/libraw/src/libraw_cxx.cpp M +1 -4 libs/rawengine/libraw/src/libraw_datastream.cpp A +811 -0 libs/rawengine/libraw/src/libraw_xtrans_compressed.cpp [License: UNKNOWN] * The files marked with a * at the end have a non valid license. Please read: http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy and use the headers which are listed at that page. http://commits.kde.org/digikam/2c67e6ffd23d8e7fda2704e875378b7f2da20905 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |