[Bug 209000] New: Allow full access to the ufraw options when converting raws

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209000





--- Comment #20 from Andi Clemens <andi clemens gmx net>  2009-10-02 11:46:20 ---
The first start wizard is only shown to people that do a fresh install of
digiKam, all the others will never see this screen.
Is there a reason why we don't enable it by default?
Sure people with an existing config will still not have the feature enabled and
have to search for this option.
I suppose the wizard uses the raw import tool option as a default, right?

But still my question is: Why not make it default and completely remove this
option? What is the benefit of NOT using the tool?

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209000





--- Comment #21 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com>  2009-10-02 12:25:29 ---
The first approach of digiKam is to be simple.

This is the goal of LightZone. You click on RAW file and all is done
automatically. RAW handling is the same than JPEG.

In fact, the world photography must be done like this. A Lots of photograph
don't care, don't know, don't want to understand what's RAW files, but know
that RAW is better than JPEG from color depth viewpoints.

Users only know advantages, not disadvantage.

So, the default option is to open and let's digiKam/Libkdcraw/libraw handle raw
 as well, without to ask any questions about demosaicing.

This is not my case of course, and for pro users sure... I only edit RAW files
with in-deep settings adjustments.

Of course, auto-gamma/WB with raw must be improved. This is the job of libraw,
not to digiKam libkdcraw. This is why, i update frequently libraw source code
in libkdcraw...

The current way of RAW in photography is really a shame. I hope in the future
that JPEG-XR will change that. Yes, i know it's M$ stuff, but all is ready to
be included in camera firmware.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XR

After that, there is no reason to support RAW format in camera anymore.

Gilles Caulier

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Linuxguy123]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209000





--- Comment #22 from Me <linuxguy123 gmail com>  2009-10-06 18:00:11 ---
I'll provide further comment after I have done some work in 1.0.0 beta 5.  I am
building it now.

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209000

--- Comment #23 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> ---
Any fresh comments since comment #22 ???

Gilles Caulier

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209000

Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |WAITINGFORINFO
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #24 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> ---
We need a fresh feedback here using last digiKam 4.2.0.

Gilles Caulier

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209000

--- Comment #25 from Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> ---
New digiKam 4.11.0 is available :

https://www.digikam.org/node/740

Can you reproduce the problem with this release ?

Gilles Caulier

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209000

[hidden email] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Allow full access to the    |More options when
                   |ufraw options when          |converting raws
                   |converting raws             |
         Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO              |FIXED
   Version Fixed In|                            |5.1.0

--- Comment #26 from [hidden email] ---
With digiKam 5.0.0, this problem is not reproducible.
I close this file now. Don't hesitate to re-open if necessary.
Gilles Caulier

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[bugzilla_noreply]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209000

[hidden email] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|Workflow                    |FilesIO-RAW

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.