[Bug 208553] New: wrong number of images in a closed recursive tag

[Noeck]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208553

           Summary: wrong number of images in a closed recursive tag
           Product: digikam
           Version: 0.10.0
          Platform: Ubuntu Packages
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: NOR
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: [hidden email]
        ReportedBy: [hidden email]


Version:           0.10.0 (using KDE 4.2.4)
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    Ubuntu Packages

Situation: I have 10 fotos and all have a tag "ExampleTag" and a tag "SubTag"
that is a child of the ExampleTag:

- ExampleTag (10)
  |
  '-SubTag (10)

Now, if I close the entry ExampleTag the count of images of all children of
ExampleTag are added to the image-count behind ExampleTag:

+ ExampleTag (20)

Which is wrong because there are only 10 images behind ExampleTag which are all
tagged twice.

I couldn't find that bug in the existing ones yet.

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208553


Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[hidden email]
          Component|general                     |Tags




--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208553





--- Comment #1 from Andi Clemens <andi clemens gmx net>  2009-10-25 02:35:07 ---
Well it isn't actually a bug, but another way of interpretation :)
We could add an option to either display the real amount of images or the
recursive amount (although I'm not a fan of adding more and more options to
setup, it is already too big).

Any other suggestions?

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Noeck]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208553





--- Comment #2 from noeck <noeck marburg gmx de>  2009-10-30 13:37:16 ---
Ok, now I see the interpretation you meant. You're right, you can count images
or tags (but subsubtags are not counted neither).
I use those numbers to check if every picture has a tag of a category,
therefore it would be useful.

EXAMPLE:
(20 pictures are tagged and should have at least one of the following tags, but
can have more)

 - quality (0)
    '-nice (10)
    '-important (8)   <- e.g. 6 of the nice ones and 2 of the bad ones
    '-bad (10)

gets

 + quality (28)

I would expect

 + quality (20)

then I could easily check if every picture has at least one tag.

END OF EXAMPLE

I would like the feature, but I think it's up to the developers to decide if
adding an option is a good idea.

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Marcel Wiesweg]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208553





--- Comment #3 from Marcel Wiesweg <marcel wiesweg gmx de>  2009-10-30 16:33:41 ---
It's not too easy to implement. To get the number "20" in the above example,
you must find all subtags for "quality", and make a query for unique image ids
tagged with any out of this group of tags.

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Gilles Caulier-4]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208553





--- Comment #4 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com>  2009-10-30 19:38:33 ---
For me the current behavior is enough. No need to make a big puzzle...

Gilles

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel

[Noeck]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208553


noeck <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #5 from noeck <noeck marburg gmx de>  2009-11-07 15:27:20 ---
I can't estimate the effort that is needed in this case. But according to what
Marcel wrote I think it's not worth it. There are so great features already
there and to come, so don't waste time on this one.

So as I opened this report, I change the status to resolved and I suppose
"wontfix" is the right option.

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Digikam-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel