|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
Summary: [wish] iptc ascii vs unicode pb Product: digikam Version: 1.0.0-beta2 Platform: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: [hidden email] ReportedBy: [hidden email] Version: 1.0.0-beta2 (using 4.2.95 (KDE 4.2.95 (KDE 4.3 RC1)), Mandriva Linux release 2010.0 (Cooker) for i586) Compiler: gcc OS: Linux (i686) release 2.6.30.1-desktop-1mnb iptc comments must be in ascii. ok but when using right panel to add comments i use unicode wich is the linux default setting today result : iptc comments is not in ascii same pb if i type comment using "iptc modify" tool then iptc comment is not in ascii please provide an automatical conversion to the users using language as french which contains special symbol as é for example also you need it to make synchronization between iptc and xmp is there a batch tool to convert to ascii all my iptc comments ? thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
--- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Machowski <mikmach wp pl> 2009-07-06 13:04:20 --- No. IPTC doesn't have to be in ASCII. According to Metadata Working Group they should be reencoded to UTF-8 and write info about this to proper field (1:190) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
--- Comment #2 from Philippe ROUBACH <philippe roubach free fr> 2009-07-06 13:27:02 --- ok but why is there a warning in iptc modify tool about comment must be in ascii ? why in the iptc block in the photo "ascii" preceeds comments ? why jalbum photoweb and picasawed display bad symbols instead of special symbol as é ? i ask to jalbum dev. he says the comments is annouced as asccii in iptc block then the comment is convert to unicode then é is badly displayed. happily in jalbum i can ask if i want to convert or not to unicode an already unicode comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
--- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Machowski <mikmach wp pl> 2009-07-06 13:39:28 --- Because this is recent agreement because companies: Adobe, Nokia, Sony, Canon, Microsoft. In the past this issue wasn't clear and many programs (most significant were Adobe products) were treating everything like ASCII. But IPTC-IIM has tools for supporting of non ASCII encodings and digiKam should use them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|general |Metadata --- Comment #4 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2009-07-06 14:24:35 --- But but but : XMP replace IPTC and do not have IPTC limitation : assii char encoding + string size ! I recommend to forget IPTC and use XMP instead. Gilles -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
--- Comment #5 from Philippe ROUBACH <philippe roubach free fr> 2009-07-06 14:33:50 --- (In reply to comment #3) so standards change. what i understand : In digikam 9.5 , i use currently, i have ascii tagged comment in iptc block in digikam 1.0.0 i will use in the future i have no ascii tagged comment in iptc comment how user manages this change when switching to 1.0.0 ? and more : apps are not synchronized. i use digikam, jalbum, picasa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
FiNeX <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[wish] iptc ascii vs |iptc ascii vs unicode pb |unicode pb | Severity|normal |wishlist -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
--- Comment #6 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2009-07-06 14:41:48 --- Other arguments in favor to XMP : multiple language comment support : this is done in 1.0.0-beta2. IPTC do not support that. For me, trying to wrap around all IPTC limitation to improve IPTC support in digiKam is a waste of time. XMP support is fully implemented... Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
--- Comment #7 from Philippe ROUBACH <philippe roubach free fr> 2009-07-06 14:43:53 --- (In reply to comment #4) i agree with you the futur is xmp your solution is good : to workaround pb use xmp comment but jalbum uses xmp comment but picasa i am not sure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
--- Comment #8 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2009-07-06 14:49:22 --- recent Picasa version, support XMP i think... I receive some test images from users to test. Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
--- Comment #9 from Mikolaj Machowski <mikmach wp pl> 2009-07-06 18:20:12 --- I think all "major" software (Lightroom, Aperture, FotoStation, Bridge) are mainly using XMP now, with syncing to IPTC-IIM sometimes[1]. But there are problems with "minor" software which due to cheapness, or no-price are still immensely popular, there is also problem with some legacy photos which were commented with IPTC tags (also including local encodings!). Latter should be fully readable in digiKam (no ?s), former - like JAlbum here - also should be someway supported. Background syncing with IPTC-IIM isn't bad solution. [1] FotoStation claims syncing with IPTC-IIM but does it in such way that many programs aren't able to read those blocks... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
--- Comment #10 from Philippe ROUBACH <philippe roubach free fr> 2009-07-06 18:43:42 --- (In reply to comment #8) > recent Picasa version, support XMP i think... I receive some test images from > users to test. > > Gilles Caulier i made a test with picasaweb and digikam 1.0.0b2 i upload a photo with comment containing an é then é is replaced by é i have a doubt about picasa supporting xmp i assume it supports previous iptc practice : ascii -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
--- Comment #11 from Philippe ROUBACH <philippe roubach free fr> 2009-07-10 10:58:24 --- (In reply to comment #6) > For me, trying to wrap around all IPTC limitation to improve IPTC support in > digiKam is a waste of time. XMP support is fully implemented... with digikam 0.9.6 i have no pb with special symbols (as é for example) when uploading to picasaweb with digikam 1.0.0 i have a pb with special symbols (as é for example) when uploading photos previously managed with 0.9.6 to picasaweb (yes a photo with xmp comment synchronized) when i will switch to digikam 1.0.0 with mandriva 2010.0 in october how i manage the pb of the specials symbol in my photos ? i understand its good for the workflow to switch from ascii to unicode but where is the tool for the user for transition ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #12 from Gilles Caulier <caulier gilles gmail com> 2009-07-20 12:45:15 --- Philippe, For me, working on IPTC UTF-8 support is waste of time. Picasa/Flickr and others photo management program MUST support XMP as well... Please report at the right place in closed source world... Gilles Caulier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
|
In reply to this post by Philippe ROUBACH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199148
Gilles Caulier <[hidden email]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|1.0.0-beta2 |1.0.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Digikam-devel mailing list [hidden email] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
